The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Towards decentralised open science with blockchains.

Towards decentralised open science with blockchains.
Towards decentralised open science with blockchains.
This work proposes and evaluates a sociotechnical system decentralising scholarly communication (SC), i.e., how researchers (1) disseminate and (2) evaluate their findings. The current set-up of SC relies on (1) academic publishing (AP) for the dissemination and (2) publisher-driven peer review (PR) and scientometrics for the evaluation of research. Currently, SC relies on resources that are computed and stored centrally in private, corporate databases. This thesis not only outlines the tensions between the oligopolistic nature of corporatised SC vs. the collaborative public-domain mindset of science, but it also documents the ‘wicked problem’ of large market players failing to curate public domain work, often privately appropriating it. Also described are shortcomings of PR and scientometrics in their current, ossified, and non-transparent formulations. Against that backdrop, using engineering and social approaches, the thesis presents an all-encompassing study into what is expected of modern SC and how to envision its future. One novel finding is that given the problems of corporate centralisation pertaining to SC, the tenets of Open Access, Open Science and Open-Source Software apply synergistically, and when implemented using the features of blockchain technology, this combination provides a valid platform to decentralise & ‘de-corporatise’ SC, to ensure its fit within the public domain. It is documented how, as part of the emerging Web3 paradigm, blockchain-based sociotechnical systems facilitate interactions among parties, reducing the number of intermediaries required and providing new efficient modes of coordination. The thesis addresses the tension between the singular ideal of truth in research juxtaposed against the pluralistic nature of research production. On the one hand, it is the use of blockchain smart contracts, whose execution is validated globally by the network, that helps with providing a single version of the truth to all scholars, thus organising research information and value exchange with fairness, transparency, and efficiency in mind. On the other hand, blueprints for SC decentralised autonomous organisations acting as federated support networks are proposed, including the governance smart contracts containing the logic for disintermediated AP (Smart Papers), decoupled PR (DAO4PR) and transparent scientometrics computations. Accordingly, novel blockchain SC software is created and evaluated computationally and sociologically. The results suggest SC needs to be modernised to stay fit for purpose and that blockchain solutions are useful towards that end, especially the proposed solution that incorporates open-source smart contracts running atop a Proof-of-Stake blockchain, Ethereum.
University of Southampton
Hoffman, Michal Robert
de48552b-3c83-41f1-8ba6-d472d8ab1513
Hoffman, Michal Robert
de48552b-3c83-41f1-8ba6-d472d8ab1513
Ibanez Gonzalez, Luis
65a2e20b-74a9-427d-8c4c-2330285153ed
Carr, Leslie
0572b10e-039d-46c6-bf05-57cce71d3936

Hoffman, Michal Robert (2023) Towards decentralised open science with blockchains. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 307pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This work proposes and evaluates a sociotechnical system decentralising scholarly communication (SC), i.e., how researchers (1) disseminate and (2) evaluate their findings. The current set-up of SC relies on (1) academic publishing (AP) for the dissemination and (2) publisher-driven peer review (PR) and scientometrics for the evaluation of research. Currently, SC relies on resources that are computed and stored centrally in private, corporate databases. This thesis not only outlines the tensions between the oligopolistic nature of corporatised SC vs. the collaborative public-domain mindset of science, but it also documents the ‘wicked problem’ of large market players failing to curate public domain work, often privately appropriating it. Also described are shortcomings of PR and scientometrics in their current, ossified, and non-transparent formulations. Against that backdrop, using engineering and social approaches, the thesis presents an all-encompassing study into what is expected of modern SC and how to envision its future. One novel finding is that given the problems of corporate centralisation pertaining to SC, the tenets of Open Access, Open Science and Open-Source Software apply synergistically, and when implemented using the features of blockchain technology, this combination provides a valid platform to decentralise & ‘de-corporatise’ SC, to ensure its fit within the public domain. It is documented how, as part of the emerging Web3 paradigm, blockchain-based sociotechnical systems facilitate interactions among parties, reducing the number of intermediaries required and providing new efficient modes of coordination. The thesis addresses the tension between the singular ideal of truth in research juxtaposed against the pluralistic nature of research production. On the one hand, it is the use of blockchain smart contracts, whose execution is validated globally by the network, that helps with providing a single version of the truth to all scholars, thus organising research information and value exchange with fairness, transparency, and efficiency in mind. On the other hand, blueprints for SC decentralised autonomous organisations acting as federated support networks are proposed, including the governance smart contracts containing the logic for disintermediated AP (Smart Papers), decoupled PR (DAO4PR) and transparent scientometrics computations. Accordingly, novel blockchain SC software is created and evaluated computationally and sociologically. The results suggest SC needs to be modernised to stay fit for purpose and that blockchain solutions are useful towards that end, especially the proposed solution that incorporates open-source smart contracts running atop a Proof-of-Stake blockchain, Ethereum.

Text
M_HOFFMAN_Thesis.pdfa - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (15MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mr-Michal-Hoffman
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.

More information

Published date: June 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 478122
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/478122
PURE UUID: 470eccaa-84de-4b0b-b32c-0d657e83f7e7
ORCID for Luis Ibanez Gonzalez: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6993-0001
ORCID for Leslie Carr: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-9680

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Jun 2023 16:33
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:31

Export record

Contributors

Author: Michal Robert Hoffman
Thesis advisor: Luis Ibanez Gonzalez ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Leslie Carr ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×