The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of rehabilitation aimed at improving outdoor mobility for people after stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of rehabilitation aimed at improving outdoor mobility for people after stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of rehabilitation aimed at improving outdoor mobility for people after stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background: up to 42% of all stroke patients do not get out of the house as much as they would like. This can impede a person's quality of life. This study is testing the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a new outdoor mobility rehabilitation intervention by comparing it to usual care.

Methods/design: this is a multi-centre parallel group individually randomised, controlled trial. At least 506 participants will be recruited through 15 primary and secondary care settings and will be eligible if they are over 18 years of age, have had a stroke and wish to get out of the house more often. Participants are being randomly allocated to either the intervention group or the control group. Intervention group participants receive up to 12 rehabilitation outdoor mobility sessions over up to four months. The main component of the intervention is repeated practice of outdoor mobility with a therapist. Control group participants are receiving the usual intervention for outdoor mobility limitations: verbal advice and provision of leaflets provided over one session.Outcome measures are being collected using postal questionnaires, travel calendars and by independent assessors. The primary outcome measure is the Social Function domain of the SF36v2 quality of life assessment six months after recruitment. The secondary outcome measures include: functional ability, mobility, the number of journeys (monthly travel diaries), satisfaction with outdoor mobility, mood, health-related quality of life, resource use of health and social care. Carer mood information is also being collected.The mean Social Function score of the SF-36v2 will be compared between treatment arms using a multiple membership form of mixed effects multiple regression analysis adjusting for centre (as a fixed effect), age and baseline Social Function score as covariates and therapist as a multiple membership random effect. Regression coefficients and 95% confidence intervals will be presented.

Discussion: this study protocol describes a pragmatic randomised controlled trial that will hopefully provide robust evidence of the benefit of outdoor mobility interventions after stroke for clinicians working in the community. The results will be available towards the end of 2012.

Trial registration: ISRCTN58683841.

activities of daily living, clinical protocols, humans, outcome assessment, health care, quality of life, sample size, stroke/psychology, stroke rehabilitation
1745-6215
Logan, Pip A.
af94e8ce-24d1-49f9-8d06-e43a2888557d
Leighton, Mat P.
804af499-2c57-4ab3-bf4e-dbe24164431b
Walker, Marion F.
5beae64c-40b3-4a9b-a67f-b5fb293235a3
Armstrong, Sarah
6ffe7027-43b4-412f-9768-5c3bf20a24e3
Gladman, John R.F.
89788999-01d4-4bd1-adb0-d96b68f2f270
Sach, Tracey H.
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Smith, Shirley
5715c20e-3302-44bb-a4a7-5ffa39f0b76f
Newell, Ossie
f19c5424-fc33-48fc-a247-a2ebbe641b99
Avery, Tony
984b9784-6659-4d74-97fa-da8e4948ee95
Williams, Hywel
805c7100-2f6e-410c-9418-ed0cad29bac7
Scott, James
38da9dc5-ce87-4dc9-96c9-14af6592c2fb
O'Neil, Kathleen
44968f62-6d7a-46ac-bf1e-ff7bc61722fa
McCluskey, Annie
9da5b157-3024-4cfd-a6bc-93d6be309449
Leach, Simon
f2a250fd-ccd7-48b5-834b-1672eaf80604
Barer, David
2d325ac3-6085-41bb-9ce7-37b0f53f6d49
Ritchie, Claire
8e6b0895-3465-457e-8c81-e002ca96e02b
Turton, Ailie
5ace1342-773e-4462-a0f1-667b3ba43d1b
Bisiker, Jane
04d274fa-41da-4b72-997e-8beb7718737d
Smithard, David
a7c28ebf-fbd7-46ec-ac3f-779ea4b9f9ec
Baird, Tess
7e29dae7-f7f1-4757-9ca7-4aabc3b0d2a8
Guyler, Paul
4e48f11b-e48e-4312-afcf-3001e2ebdfeb
Jackson, Therese
5d521831-4afc-486f-be05-8990008c0cc7
Watmough, Ingrid
132a9d88-d6c3-4b12-986b-c0014c4feb63
Webster, Maggie
5f98ea8f-c038-4756-bf7a-ac972558e180
Ivey, Janet
2e03d5d5-5d67-48ed-a643-999362fc7f19
Logan, Pip A.
af94e8ce-24d1-49f9-8d06-e43a2888557d
Leighton, Mat P.
804af499-2c57-4ab3-bf4e-dbe24164431b
Walker, Marion F.
5beae64c-40b3-4a9b-a67f-b5fb293235a3
Armstrong, Sarah
6ffe7027-43b4-412f-9768-5c3bf20a24e3
Gladman, John R.F.
89788999-01d4-4bd1-adb0-d96b68f2f270
Sach, Tracey H.
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Smith, Shirley
5715c20e-3302-44bb-a4a7-5ffa39f0b76f
Newell, Ossie
f19c5424-fc33-48fc-a247-a2ebbe641b99
Avery, Tony
984b9784-6659-4d74-97fa-da8e4948ee95
Williams, Hywel
805c7100-2f6e-410c-9418-ed0cad29bac7
Scott, James
38da9dc5-ce87-4dc9-96c9-14af6592c2fb
O'Neil, Kathleen
44968f62-6d7a-46ac-bf1e-ff7bc61722fa
McCluskey, Annie
9da5b157-3024-4cfd-a6bc-93d6be309449
Leach, Simon
f2a250fd-ccd7-48b5-834b-1672eaf80604
Barer, David
2d325ac3-6085-41bb-9ce7-37b0f53f6d49
Ritchie, Claire
8e6b0895-3465-457e-8c81-e002ca96e02b
Turton, Ailie
5ace1342-773e-4462-a0f1-667b3ba43d1b
Bisiker, Jane
04d274fa-41da-4b72-997e-8beb7718737d
Smithard, David
a7c28ebf-fbd7-46ec-ac3f-779ea4b9f9ec
Baird, Tess
7e29dae7-f7f1-4757-9ca7-4aabc3b0d2a8
Guyler, Paul
4e48f11b-e48e-4312-afcf-3001e2ebdfeb
Jackson, Therese
5d521831-4afc-486f-be05-8990008c0cc7
Watmough, Ingrid
132a9d88-d6c3-4b12-986b-c0014c4feb63
Webster, Maggie
5f98ea8f-c038-4756-bf7a-ac972558e180
Ivey, Janet
2e03d5d5-5d67-48ed-a643-999362fc7f19

Logan, Pip A., Leighton, Mat P., Walker, Marion F., Armstrong, Sarah, Gladman, John R.F., Sach, Tracey H., Smith, Shirley, Newell, Ossie, Avery, Tony, Williams, Hywel, Scott, James, O'Neil, Kathleen, McCluskey, Annie, Leach, Simon, Barer, David, Ritchie, Claire, Turton, Ailie, Bisiker, Jane, Smithard, David, Baird, Tess, Guyler, Paul, Jackson, Therese, Watmough, Ingrid, Webster, Maggie and Ivey, Janet (2012) A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of rehabilitation aimed at improving outdoor mobility for people after stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 13, [86]. (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-13-86).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: up to 42% of all stroke patients do not get out of the house as much as they would like. This can impede a person's quality of life. This study is testing the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a new outdoor mobility rehabilitation intervention by comparing it to usual care.

Methods/design: this is a multi-centre parallel group individually randomised, controlled trial. At least 506 participants will be recruited through 15 primary and secondary care settings and will be eligible if they are over 18 years of age, have had a stroke and wish to get out of the house more often. Participants are being randomly allocated to either the intervention group or the control group. Intervention group participants receive up to 12 rehabilitation outdoor mobility sessions over up to four months. The main component of the intervention is repeated practice of outdoor mobility with a therapist. Control group participants are receiving the usual intervention for outdoor mobility limitations: verbal advice and provision of leaflets provided over one session.Outcome measures are being collected using postal questionnaires, travel calendars and by independent assessors. The primary outcome measure is the Social Function domain of the SF36v2 quality of life assessment six months after recruitment. The secondary outcome measures include: functional ability, mobility, the number of journeys (monthly travel diaries), satisfaction with outdoor mobility, mood, health-related quality of life, resource use of health and social care. Carer mood information is also being collected.The mean Social Function score of the SF-36v2 will be compared between treatment arms using a multiple membership form of mixed effects multiple regression analysis adjusting for centre (as a fixed effect), age and baseline Social Function score as covariates and therapist as a multiple membership random effect. Regression coefficients and 95% confidence intervals will be presented.

Discussion: this study protocol describes a pragmatic randomised controlled trial that will hopefully provide robust evidence of the benefit of outdoor mobility interventions after stroke for clinicians working in the community. The results will be available towards the end of 2012.

Trial registration: ISRCTN58683841.

Text
1745-6215-13-86 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (358kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 May 2012
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 June 2012
Keywords: activities of daily living, clinical protocols, humans, outcome assessment, health care, quality of life, sample size, stroke/psychology, stroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 478157
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/478157
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: 63f768e8-62b3-40cc-88ad-cee458a041af
ORCID for Tracey H. Sach: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-9220

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Jun 2023 16:32
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Pip A. Logan
Author: Mat P. Leighton
Author: Marion F. Walker
Author: Sarah Armstrong
Author: John R.F. Gladman
Author: Tracey H. Sach ORCID iD
Author: Shirley Smith
Author: Ossie Newell
Author: Tony Avery
Author: Hywel Williams
Author: James Scott
Author: Kathleen O'Neil
Author: Annie McCluskey
Author: Simon Leach
Author: David Barer
Author: Claire Ritchie
Author: Ailie Turton
Author: Jane Bisiker
Author: David Smithard
Author: Tess Baird
Author: Paul Guyler
Author: Therese Jackson
Author: Ingrid Watmough
Author: Maggie Webster
Author: Janet Ivey

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×