The Expert and Research-led Criminal Justice Policy-making
The Expert and Research-led Criminal Justice Policy-making
In recent years, there has been considerable academic debate about the relation-ship between research expertise and public policy- making. Originating in the fi eld of health policy, the idea that policy should be underpinned by research evidence spread to other policy areas, and formed part of the ‘what works’ movement adopted by the New Labour administration. However, in October 2009, in defi -ance of its own commitment to produce policy that would refl ect research- based evidence, the Home Secretary forced Professor David Nutt, the government’s appointed scientifi c advisor on the misuse of drugs, to resign after he made public research fi ndings that ran counter to the government’s policy on drugs (Tran, 2009). The controversial ‘sacking’ was a very public example of government refusal to reverse its policy- making, despite being presented with ‘a formidable body of evidence that could make a strong case’ in favour of a change of direction (Currie, 2007: 117). With this case in mind, this chapter traces the rise and fall of evidenced- based policy- making (EBP) as a primary infl uence on policy- making, and serves as a timely reminder that governments are ever mindful of how their actions will be interpreted by the media, the electorate and vested interests.
99-121
Hamerton, Christopher
49e79eba-521a-4bea-ae10-af7f2f852210
Hobbs, Suzanne
0c856978-b2ca-418b-89e7-98d666e0a137
22 April 2014
Hamerton, Christopher
49e79eba-521a-4bea-ae10-af7f2f852210
Hobbs, Suzanne
0c856978-b2ca-418b-89e7-98d666e0a137
Hamerton, Christopher and Hobbs, Suzanne
(2014)
The Expert and Research-led Criminal Justice Policy-making.
In,
The Making of Criminal Justice Policy.
1 ed.
Abingdon.
Routledge, .
(doi:10.4324/9781315798080).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
In recent years, there has been considerable academic debate about the relation-ship between research expertise and public policy- making. Originating in the fi eld of health policy, the idea that policy should be underpinned by research evidence spread to other policy areas, and formed part of the ‘what works’ movement adopted by the New Labour administration. However, in October 2009, in defi -ance of its own commitment to produce policy that would refl ect research- based evidence, the Home Secretary forced Professor David Nutt, the government’s appointed scientifi c advisor on the misuse of drugs, to resign after he made public research fi ndings that ran counter to the government’s policy on drugs (Tran, 2009). The controversial ‘sacking’ was a very public example of government refusal to reverse its policy- making, despite being presented with ‘a formidable body of evidence that could make a strong case’ in favour of a change of direction (Currie, 2007: 117). With this case in mind, this chapter traces the rise and fall of evidenced- based policy- making (EBP) as a primary infl uence on policy- making, and serves as a timely reminder that governments are ever mindful of how their actions will be interpreted by the media, the electorate and vested interests.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 22 April 2014
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 478206
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/478206
PURE UUID: b904b89a-e320-4d48-abc3-6576dd5a2c50
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 23 Jun 2023 17:02
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:52
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Suzanne Hobbs
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics