The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Antimicrobial stewardship programmes focused on de-escalation: a narrative review of efficacy and risks

Antimicrobial stewardship programmes focused on de-escalation: a narrative review of efficacy and risks
Antimicrobial stewardship programmes focused on de-escalation: a narrative review of efficacy and risks
Background and objective: multi-drug resistance is an increasing problem and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. High levels of antimicrobial consumption and broad-spectrum antimicrobial use are associated with antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Studies have shown substantial antimicrobial use across intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide. International guidelines advise antibiotic de-escalation (ADE) as part of an antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP). ADE is a strategy to decrease the spectrum of the empirical antimicrobial therapy, with the aim to reduce the ecological impact on the patient’s microbiome and reduce the emergence of AMR. Our aim was to provide an insight into the latest developments on ADE in the intensive care setting.

Methods: PubMed was searched using the terms ‘antibiotic de-escalation’ and ‘antimicrobial stewardship’ up to and including November 2021.

Key content and findings: evidence to date is limited, ADE appears to be a safe intervention. The evidence is inconclusive regarding resistance development. Concerns regarding increased duration and superinfections with an ADE approach are unproven with studies finding mixed results. ADE should not be used as a sole quality indicator as this could encourage empiric broad-spectrum antimicrobial overuse.

Conclusions: ADE appears safe. Evidence is inconclusive regarding resistance development but data to date is limited. ADE should be used alongside other antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) measures. These include appropriate empirical therapy, guided by local guidelines considering local epidemiology and host factors, optimal dosing, regular review of antimicrobial therapy with clinical progress and microbiology results, with de-escalation as soon as feasible and early cessation where appropriate, and infection control measures.
2521-3563
Umpleby, Helen
6920b87a-0497-4533-8728-16bd2c7134d9
Dushianthan, Ahilanandan
752914e4-cfab-4055-9610-f460a54e9433
Catton, Tim
619b6b92-2f4a-403b-958f-06f1e36e9213
Saeed, Kordo
87cb67e5-71e8-4759-bf23-2ea00ebd8b39
Umpleby, Helen
6920b87a-0497-4533-8728-16bd2c7134d9
Dushianthan, Ahilanandan
752914e4-cfab-4055-9610-f460a54e9433
Catton, Tim
619b6b92-2f4a-403b-958f-06f1e36e9213
Saeed, Kordo
87cb67e5-71e8-4759-bf23-2ea00ebd8b39

Umpleby, Helen, Dushianthan, Ahilanandan, Catton, Tim and Saeed, Kordo (2022) Antimicrobial stewardship programmes focused on de-escalation: a narrative review of efficacy and risks. Journal of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, 6. (doi:10.21037/jeccm-22-6).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background and objective: multi-drug resistance is an increasing problem and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. High levels of antimicrobial consumption and broad-spectrum antimicrobial use are associated with antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Studies have shown substantial antimicrobial use across intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide. International guidelines advise antibiotic de-escalation (ADE) as part of an antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP). ADE is a strategy to decrease the spectrum of the empirical antimicrobial therapy, with the aim to reduce the ecological impact on the patient’s microbiome and reduce the emergence of AMR. Our aim was to provide an insight into the latest developments on ADE in the intensive care setting.

Methods: PubMed was searched using the terms ‘antibiotic de-escalation’ and ‘antimicrobial stewardship’ up to and including November 2021.

Key content and findings: evidence to date is limited, ADE appears to be a safe intervention. The evidence is inconclusive regarding resistance development. Concerns regarding increased duration and superinfections with an ADE approach are unproven with studies finding mixed results. ADE should not be used as a sole quality indicator as this could encourage empiric broad-spectrum antimicrobial overuse.

Conclusions: ADE appears safe. Evidence is inconclusive regarding resistance development but data to date is limited. ADE should be used alongside other antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) measures. These include appropriate empirical therapy, guided by local guidelines considering local epidemiology and host factors, optimal dosing, regular review of antimicrobial therapy with clinical progress and microbiology results, with de-escalation as soon as feasible and early cessation where appropriate, and infection control measures.

Text
7515-PB5-7797-R2 - Version of Record
Download (203kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 6 June 2022
Published date: 30 July 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 478415
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/478415
ISSN: 2521-3563
PURE UUID: cf9cc262-69fc-48ce-adc5-89712a209eb5
ORCID for Kordo Saeed: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0123-0302

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Jun 2023 16:39
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Helen Umpleby
Author: Ahilanandan Dushianthan
Author: Tim Catton
Author: Kordo Saeed ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×