The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Abstract thinking increases support for affirmative action

Abstract thinking increases support for affirmative action
Abstract thinking increases support for affirmative action
Affirmative action is the proactive process of using resources to ensure that people are not discriminated against based on their group membership, such as gender or ethnicity. It is an effective way to reduce discrimination, but attitudes toward affirmative action are often negative, especially in groups implementing affirmative action. Previous research identified different influences on attitudes toward affirmative action, but mainly unchangeable ones. We focus on the influence of abstract thinking on support for affirmative action because abstract thinking is a changeable characteristic that can direct attention to the purpose of affirmative action policies. Across five studies with U.S. MTurk workers—focusing on women as the target group, but including other target groups as well—we show that thinking abstractly improves attitudes toward affirmative action. We observe this effect using correlational (Study 1, n = 251) and experimental (Studies 2–5, ns = 201–515) designs. Additionally, we test whether perceived discrimination increases the impact of abstract thinking on attitudes toward affirmation action (Studies 2–5). We report a meta-analysis across our studies. Overall, thinking abstractly about affirmative action clearly leads to more favorable attitudes toward it, and this effect is somewhat stronger when discrimination is perceived to be high. Consequently, companies and policymakers that would like to increase support for affirmative action policies could use abstract thinking to do so, for example by encouraging employees to think about and discuss why (vs. how) affirmative action policies are implemented.
0360-0025
493-511
Fleischmann, Alexandra
4b507038-7d71-4173-b3b9-f07b98f63e5c
Burgmer, Pascal
c8c43b56-572c-4242-800c-9f44ff648cec
Fleischmann, Alexandra
4b507038-7d71-4173-b3b9-f07b98f63e5c
Burgmer, Pascal
c8c43b56-572c-4242-800c-9f44ff648cec

Fleischmann, Alexandra and Burgmer, Pascal (2020) Abstract thinking increases support for affirmative action. Sex Roles, 82, 493-511. (doi:10.1007/s11199-019-01068-2).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Affirmative action is the proactive process of using resources to ensure that people are not discriminated against based on their group membership, such as gender or ethnicity. It is an effective way to reduce discrimination, but attitudes toward affirmative action are often negative, especially in groups implementing affirmative action. Previous research identified different influences on attitudes toward affirmative action, but mainly unchangeable ones. We focus on the influence of abstract thinking on support for affirmative action because abstract thinking is a changeable characteristic that can direct attention to the purpose of affirmative action policies. Across five studies with U.S. MTurk workers—focusing on women as the target group, but including other target groups as well—we show that thinking abstractly improves attitudes toward affirmative action. We observe this effect using correlational (Study 1, n = 251) and experimental (Studies 2–5, ns = 201–515) designs. Additionally, we test whether perceived discrimination increases the impact of abstract thinking on attitudes toward affirmation action (Studies 2–5). We report a meta-analysis across our studies. Overall, thinking abstractly about affirmative action clearly leads to more favorable attitudes toward it, and this effect is somewhat stronger when discrimination is perceived to be high. Consequently, companies and policymakers that would like to increase support for affirmative action policies could use abstract thinking to do so, for example by encouraging employees to think about and discuss why (vs. how) affirmative action policies are implemented.

Text
Fleischmann & Burgmer (2020, Sex Roles) – Abstract Thinking & Affirmative Action (Accepted Manuscript) - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Other.
Download (908kB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 5 July 2019
Published date: 1 April 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 478439
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/478439
ISSN: 0360-0025
PURE UUID: 9b754ae6-7285-4082-9398-68efe8a421cc

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Jun 2023 16:53
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alexandra Fleischmann
Author: Pascal Burgmer

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×