The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Large inherent variability in data derived from highly standardised cell culture experiments

Large inherent variability in data derived from highly standardised cell culture experiments
Large inherent variability in data derived from highly standardised cell culture experiments
Cancer drug development is hindered by high clinical attrition rates, which are blamed on weak predictive power by preclinical models and limited replicability of preclinical findings. However, the technically feasible level of replicability remains unknown. To fill this gap, we conducted an analysis of data from the NCI60 cancer cell line screen (2.8 million compound/cell line experiments), which is to our knowledge the largest depository of experiments that have been repeatedly performed over decades. The findings revealed profound intra-laboratory data variability, although all experiments were executed following highly standardised protocols that avoid all known confounders of data quality. All compound/ cell line combinations with > 100 independent biological replicates displayed maximum GI50 (50% growth inhibition) fold changes (highest/ lowest GI50) > 5% and 70.5% displayed maximum fold changes > 1000. The highest maximum fold change was 3.16 × 1010 (lowest GI50: 7.93 ×10-10 µM, highest GI50: 25.0 µM). FDA-approved drugs and experimental agents displayed similar variation. Variability remained high after outlier removal, when only considering experiments that tested drugs at the same concentration range, and when only considering NCI60-provided quality-controlled data. In conclusion, high variability is an intrinsic feature of anti-cancer drug testing, even among standardised experiments in a world-leading research environment. Awareness of this inherent variability will support realistic data interpretation and inspire research to improve data robustness. Further research will have to show whether the inclusion of a wider variety of model systems, such as animal and/ or patient-derived models, may improve data robustness.
Anti-cancer drugs, Attrition, Cancer cell line, Chemotherapy, Data reproducibility, Drug development, Drug discovery, NCI60, Replicability, Screen
1043-6618
106671
Reddin, Ian G.
b5f50ec1-83fb-4f15-a41f-f9c544d7ccc0
Fenton, Tim R.
087260ba-f6a1-405a-85df-099d05810a84
Wass, Mark N.
58e102d5-8520-4372-a826-d3aa6f14d1f1
Michaelis, Martin
be3faca6-397a-40e1-be6e-3a8c89eeb341
Reddin, Ian G.
b5f50ec1-83fb-4f15-a41f-f9c544d7ccc0
Fenton, Tim R.
087260ba-f6a1-405a-85df-099d05810a84
Wass, Mark N.
58e102d5-8520-4372-a826-d3aa6f14d1f1
Michaelis, Martin
be3faca6-397a-40e1-be6e-3a8c89eeb341

Reddin, Ian G., Fenton, Tim R., Wass, Mark N. and Michaelis, Martin (2023) Large inherent variability in data derived from highly standardised cell culture experiments. Pharmacological Research, 188 (2), 106671, [106671]. (doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106671).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Cancer drug development is hindered by high clinical attrition rates, which are blamed on weak predictive power by preclinical models and limited replicability of preclinical findings. However, the technically feasible level of replicability remains unknown. To fill this gap, we conducted an analysis of data from the NCI60 cancer cell line screen (2.8 million compound/cell line experiments), which is to our knowledge the largest depository of experiments that have been repeatedly performed over decades. The findings revealed profound intra-laboratory data variability, although all experiments were executed following highly standardised protocols that avoid all known confounders of data quality. All compound/ cell line combinations with > 100 independent biological replicates displayed maximum GI50 (50% growth inhibition) fold changes (highest/ lowest GI50) > 5% and 70.5% displayed maximum fold changes > 1000. The highest maximum fold change was 3.16 × 1010 (lowest GI50: 7.93 ×10-10 µM, highest GI50: 25.0 µM). FDA-approved drugs and experimental agents displayed similar variation. Variability remained high after outlier removal, when only considering experiments that tested drugs at the same concentration range, and when only considering NCI60-provided quality-controlled data. In conclusion, high variability is an intrinsic feature of anti-cancer drug testing, even among standardised experiments in a world-leading research environment. Awareness of this inherent variability will support realistic data interpretation and inspire research to improve data robustness. Further research will have to show whether the inclusion of a wider variety of model systems, such as animal and/ or patient-derived models, may improve data robustness.

Text
Large_inherent_variability_in_data_derived - Version of Record
Download (4MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 January 2023
Published date: 1 February 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: The authors thank Dr Robert H Shoemaker for critical reading of our manuscript and helpful discussion. none. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors
Keywords: Anti-cancer drugs, Attrition, Cancer cell line, Chemotherapy, Data reproducibility, Drug development, Drug discovery, NCI60, Replicability, Screen

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 478565
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/478565
ISSN: 1043-6618
PURE UUID: 68426ba8-dbf2-4572-8c53-3407f493effb
ORCID for Ian G. Reddin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5478-7855
ORCID for Tim R. Fenton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4737-8233

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2023 18:04
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:04

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ian G. Reddin ORCID iD
Author: Tim R. Fenton ORCID iD
Author: Mark N. Wass
Author: Martin Michaelis

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×