The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Communicating the environmental risk of product returns

Communicating the environmental risk of product returns
Communicating the environmental risk of product returns
Product returns consume substantial resources and inflict sizeable environmentally harmful emissions. They require additional transportation and packaging, and many returned items, especially apparel products, are often discarded because their conditions or operational/financial constraints thwart resale. Returns that end up in landfills not only waste materials but also release greenhouse gases as they decompose. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, customers' growing demand for 'effortless' returns processes has led to increased waste and environmental damage. While studies suggest that messages about environmental impacts could elicit responsible behaviours and moral emotions have strong impacts on environmental behaviour, we still lack empirical investigations in communicating the environmental impacts of product returns.

To address this knowledge gap, we conducted an experimental study in which 291 UK participants were presented with environmental risk information on product returns using one of the three presentation formats (i.e., positive message with an image, negative message with an image, and neutral message with text only). It measured participants' (1) multiple-size order and returns decisions, (2) moral emotions of guilt and pride, and (3) pro-environmental behavioural intention in the future. Contrary to expectations, the results revealed that there is no statistically significant difference between formats regarding customers' intention of reconsidering their multiple-size orders to reduce returns-induced environmental risk. Furthermore, participants felt more guilty about their returns' environmental damage and would like to shop more responsibly when the information was displayed in a negative format. Importantly, the answers of open-ended questions show that participants (1) believed that they had not been informed about how returns caused environmental risk and were unaware that returned products cannot always be resold, and (2) considered that individual returns would be too insignificant to cause great environmental damage. Our findings contribute to the existing research avenues of climate change communication, environmental damage prevention, and the influence of moral emotions on individuals' environmental attitudes. Collectively, the findings of this study demonstrate an urgent need for further risk communication research to develop more sophisticated environmental messages regarding product returns, which in turn would encourage customers to shop and return more responsibly.
42
Zhang, Danni
c81a5801-9c21-4c27-a340-45874b5274f9
Dawson, Ian
dff1b440-6c83-4354-92b6-04809460b01a
Frei, Regina
fa00170f-356a-4a0d-8030-d137fd855880
Zhang, Danni
c81a5801-9c21-4c27-a340-45874b5274f9
Dawson, Ian
dff1b440-6c83-4354-92b6-04809460b01a
Frei, Regina
fa00170f-356a-4a0d-8030-d137fd855880

Zhang, Danni, Dawson, Ian and Frei, Regina (2023) Communicating the environmental risk of product returns. The 31th Annual Conference for the Society of Risk Analysis - Europe: Risk and Assessment in a Changing World, Lund University , Lund, Sweden. 19 - 21 Jun 2023. p. 42 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Other)

Abstract

Product returns consume substantial resources and inflict sizeable environmentally harmful emissions. They require additional transportation and packaging, and many returned items, especially apparel products, are often discarded because their conditions or operational/financial constraints thwart resale. Returns that end up in landfills not only waste materials but also release greenhouse gases as they decompose. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, customers' growing demand for 'effortless' returns processes has led to increased waste and environmental damage. While studies suggest that messages about environmental impacts could elicit responsible behaviours and moral emotions have strong impacts on environmental behaviour, we still lack empirical investigations in communicating the environmental impacts of product returns.

To address this knowledge gap, we conducted an experimental study in which 291 UK participants were presented with environmental risk information on product returns using one of the three presentation formats (i.e., positive message with an image, negative message with an image, and neutral message with text only). It measured participants' (1) multiple-size order and returns decisions, (2) moral emotions of guilt and pride, and (3) pro-environmental behavioural intention in the future. Contrary to expectations, the results revealed that there is no statistically significant difference between formats regarding customers' intention of reconsidering their multiple-size orders to reduce returns-induced environmental risk. Furthermore, participants felt more guilty about their returns' environmental damage and would like to shop more responsibly when the information was displayed in a negative format. Importantly, the answers of open-ended questions show that participants (1) believed that they had not been informed about how returns caused environmental risk and were unaware that returned products cannot always be resold, and (2) considered that individual returns would be too insignificant to cause great environmental damage. Our findings contribute to the existing research avenues of climate change communication, environmental damage prevention, and the influence of moral emotions on individuals' environmental attitudes. Collectively, the findings of this study demonstrate an urgent need for further risk communication research to develop more sophisticated environmental messages regarding product returns, which in turn would encourage customers to shop and return more responsibly.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 19 June 2023
Venue - Dates: The 31th Annual Conference for the Society of Risk Analysis - Europe: Risk and Assessment in a Changing World, Lund University , Lund, Sweden, 2023-06-19 - 2023-06-21

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 478632
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/478632
PURE UUID: 8e103870-bb88-4fa6-b94f-fd56e4576c8a
ORCID for Danni Zhang: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2729-9562
ORCID for Ian Dawson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0555-9682
ORCID for Regina Frei: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0953-6413

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jul 2023 16:32
Last modified: 07 Jul 2023 01:55

Export record

Contributors

Author: Danni Zhang ORCID iD
Author: Ian Dawson ORCID iD
Author: Regina Frei ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×