The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Perceived barriers to randomised controlled trials in breast reconstruction: obstacle to trial initiation or opportunity to resolve?: A qualitative study

Perceived barriers to randomised controlled trials in breast reconstruction: obstacle to trial initiation or opportunity to resolve?: A qualitative study
Perceived barriers to randomised controlled trials in breast reconstruction: obstacle to trial initiation or opportunity to resolve?: A qualitative study

Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed breast reconstruction technique worldwide but the technique is evolving rapidly. High-quality evidence is needed to support practice. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide the best evidence but can be challenging to conduct. iBRA is a four-phased study which aimed to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of an RCT in IBBR. In phase 3, the randomisation acceptability study, an electronic survey and qualitative interviews were conducted to explore professionals' perceptions of future trials in IBBR. Findings from the interviews are presented here.

Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were undertaken with a purposive sample of 31 health professionals (HPs) who completed the survey to explore their attitudes to the feasibility of potential RCTs in more detail. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and data were analysed thematically using constant comparative techniques. Sampling, data collection and analysis were undertaken iteratively and concurrently until data saturation was achieved.

Results: Almost all HPs acknowledged the need for better evidence to support the practice of IBBR and most identified RCTs as generating the highest-quality evidence. Despite highlighting potential challenges, most participants supported the need for an RCT in IBBR. A minority, however, were strongly opposed to a future trial. The opposition and challenges identified centred around three key themes; (i) limited understanding of pragmatic study design and the value of randomisation in minimising bias; (ii) clinician and patient equipoise and (iii) aspects of surgical culture and training that were not supportive of RCTs.

Conclusion: There is a need for well-designed, large-scale RCTs to support the current practice of IBBR but barriers to their acceptability are evident. The perceived barriers to RCTs in breast reconstruction identified in this study are not insurmountable and have previously been overcome in other similar surgical trials. This may represent an opportunity, not only to establish the evidence base for IBBR, but also to improve engagement in RCTs in breast surgery in general to ultimately improve outcomes for patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN37664281.

Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Mammaplasty/methods, Patient Selection, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Qualitative Research, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods, Surveys and Questionnaires
1745-6215
Davies, Gareth
41d7c3c5-8673-4095-a88b-a71998526079
Mills, Nicola
d43e1677-c156-4fc6-a09c-6519798682cc
Holcombe, Chris
f9196a8b-3f04-49cf-aa7b-e0a3e02caa57
Potter, Shelley
846066f0-1336-45e1-828b-dfdedfc5c1be
Cutress, Ramsey
68ae4f86-e8cf-411f-a335-cdba51797406
iBRA Steering Group
Davies, Gareth
41d7c3c5-8673-4095-a88b-a71998526079
Mills, Nicola
d43e1677-c156-4fc6-a09c-6519798682cc
Holcombe, Chris
f9196a8b-3f04-49cf-aa7b-e0a3e02caa57
Potter, Shelley
846066f0-1336-45e1-828b-dfdedfc5c1be
Cutress, Ramsey
68ae4f86-e8cf-411f-a335-cdba51797406

Davies, Gareth, Mills, Nicola, Holcombe, Chris, Potter, Shelley and Cutress, Ramsey , iBRA Steering Group (2020) Perceived barriers to randomised controlled trials in breast reconstruction: obstacle to trial initiation or opportunity to resolve?: A qualitative study. Trials, 21 (1), [316]. (doi:10.1186/s13063-020-4227-1).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed breast reconstruction technique worldwide but the technique is evolving rapidly. High-quality evidence is needed to support practice. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide the best evidence but can be challenging to conduct. iBRA is a four-phased study which aimed to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of an RCT in IBBR. In phase 3, the randomisation acceptability study, an electronic survey and qualitative interviews were conducted to explore professionals' perceptions of future trials in IBBR. Findings from the interviews are presented here.

Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were undertaken with a purposive sample of 31 health professionals (HPs) who completed the survey to explore their attitudes to the feasibility of potential RCTs in more detail. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and data were analysed thematically using constant comparative techniques. Sampling, data collection and analysis were undertaken iteratively and concurrently until data saturation was achieved.

Results: Almost all HPs acknowledged the need for better evidence to support the practice of IBBR and most identified RCTs as generating the highest-quality evidence. Despite highlighting potential challenges, most participants supported the need for an RCT in IBBR. A minority, however, were strongly opposed to a future trial. The opposition and challenges identified centred around three key themes; (i) limited understanding of pragmatic study design and the value of randomisation in minimising bias; (ii) clinician and patient equipoise and (iii) aspects of surgical culture and training that were not supportive of RCTs.

Conclusion: There is a need for well-designed, large-scale RCTs to support the current practice of IBBR but barriers to their acceptability are evident. The perceived barriers to RCTs in breast reconstruction identified in this study are not insurmountable and have previously been overcome in other similar surgical trials. This may represent an opportunity, not only to establish the evidence base for IBBR, but also to improve engagement in RCTs in breast surgery in general to ultimately improve outcomes for patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN37664281.

Text
s13063-020-4227-1 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (360kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 3 March 2020
Published date: 6 April 2020
Keywords: Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Mammaplasty/methods, Patient Selection, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Qualitative Research, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods, Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 478711
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/478711
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: ea30c4aa-5b20-4ff2-9dcd-7d0443faaab6

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jul 2023 16:41
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 23:45

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gareth Davies
Author: Nicola Mills
Author: Chris Holcombe
Author: Shelley Potter
Author: Ramsey Cutress
Corporate Author: iBRA Steering Group

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×