Closing the implementation gap: comment on “insights gained from a re-analysis of five improvement cases in healthcare integrating system dynamics into action research”
Closing the implementation gap: comment on “insights gained from a re-analysis of five improvement cases in healthcare integrating system dynamics into action research”
Holmström et al provide an interesting and thought-provoking contribution to a perennial problem: why, despite a vast number of applications of simulation modelling in healthcare over the past 70 years, there is still remarkably little evidence of successful implementation of model results. Their paper is a retrospective analysis of five case studies, all undertaken as consultancy, that used a blend of system dynamics (SD) modelling and action research (AR). This commentary assesses the effectiveness of this approach in achieving implementation, based on the evidence presented, and discusses some of the issues raised. These issues include a comparison of Holmström’s approach with group model building (GMB) in SD, the differences between healthcare modelling projects undertaken by (a) business consultants and (b) academics, and the challenges of undertaking ‘systematic’ reviews of the grey literature.
action research, implementation, simulation, system dynamics
Brailsford, Sally
634585ff-c828-46ca-b33d-7ac017dda04f
Brailsford, Sally
634585ff-c828-46ca-b33d-7ac017dda04f
Brailsford, Sally
(2022)
Closing the implementation gap: comment on “insights gained from a re-analysis of five improvement cases in healthcare integrating system dynamics into action research”.
International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 12 (1), [7593].
(doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7593).
Abstract
Holmström et al provide an interesting and thought-provoking contribution to a perennial problem: why, despite a vast number of applications of simulation modelling in healthcare over the past 70 years, there is still remarkably little evidence of successful implementation of model results. Their paper is a retrospective analysis of five case studies, all undertaken as consultancy, that used a blend of system dynamics (SD) modelling and action research (AR). This commentary assesses the effectiveness of this approach in achieving implementation, based on the evidence presented, and discusses some of the issues raised. These issues include a comparison of Holmström’s approach with group model building (GMB) in SD, the differences between healthcare modelling projects undertaken by (a) business consultants and (b) academics, and the challenges of undertaking ‘systematic’ reviews of the grey literature.
Text
IJHPM_Volume 12_Issue Issue 1_Pages 1-3
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 3 October 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 November 2022
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences.
Keywords:
action research, implementation, simulation, system dynamics
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 478762
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/478762
ISSN: 2322-5939
PURE UUID: 31fefa09-d4a7-4458-b2ea-c924c3d7e868
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Jul 2023 16:31
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:38
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
