The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Two-faced morality: distrust promotes divergent moral standards for the self versus others

Two-faced morality: distrust promotes divergent moral standards for the self versus others
Two-faced morality: distrust promotes divergent moral standards for the self versus others
People do not trust hypocrites, because they preach water, but drink wine. The current research shows that, ironically, when we distrust, we become moral hypocrites ourselves. We argue that experiencing distrust alerts us to the possibility that others may intent to exploit us, and that such looming exploitation differentially affects moral standards for the self versus others. Four studies (N = 1,225) examined this possibility and its underlying motivational dynamic. Study 1 established a relationship between dispositional distrust and flexible, self-serving moral cognition. In Studies 2 and 3, participants experiencing distrust (vs. trust) endorsed more lenient moral standards for themselves than for others. Study 4 explored the role of the motivation to avoid exploitation in these effects. Specifically, participants’ dispositional victim sensitivity moderated the effect of distrust on hypocrisy. Together, these findings suggest that individuals who distrust and fear to be exploited show self-serving, and hence untrustworthy, moral cognition themselves.
0146-1672
1712-1724
Weiss, Alexa
38d1177a-1f9e-44b3-b404-47eebb701257
Burgmer, Pascal
c8c43b56-572c-4242-800c-9f44ff648cec
Mussweiler, Thomas
cfed9b9c-d8f3-4ce0-80e1-27307c08a40c
Weiss, Alexa
38d1177a-1f9e-44b3-b404-47eebb701257
Burgmer, Pascal
c8c43b56-572c-4242-800c-9f44ff648cec
Mussweiler, Thomas
cfed9b9c-d8f3-4ce0-80e1-27307c08a40c

Weiss, Alexa, Burgmer, Pascal and Mussweiler, Thomas (2018) Two-faced morality: distrust promotes divergent moral standards for the self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44 (12), 1712-1724. (doi:10.1177/0146167218775693).

Record type: Article

Abstract

People do not trust hypocrites, because they preach water, but drink wine. The current research shows that, ironically, when we distrust, we become moral hypocrites ourselves. We argue that experiencing distrust alerts us to the possibility that others may intent to exploit us, and that such looming exploitation differentially affects moral standards for the self versus others. Four studies (N = 1,225) examined this possibility and its underlying motivational dynamic. Study 1 established a relationship between dispositional distrust and flexible, self-serving moral cognition. In Studies 2 and 3, participants experiencing distrust (vs. trust) endorsed more lenient moral standards for themselves than for others. Study 4 explored the role of the motivation to avoid exploitation in these effects. Specifically, participants’ dispositional victim sensitivity moderated the effect of distrust on hypocrisy. Together, these findings suggest that individuals who distrust and fear to be exploited show self-serving, and hence untrustworthy, moral cognition themselves.

Text
Weiss, Burgmer, & Mussweiler (2018, PSPB) – Distrust & Moral Hypocrisy (Accepted Manuscript) - Accepted Manuscript
Download (354kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 15 April 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 May 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 478839
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/478839
ISSN: 0146-1672
PURE UUID: a5a6f178-6d6d-4089-81f4-a444130f85ad

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Jul 2023 17:03
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alexa Weiss
Author: Pascal Burgmer
Author: Thomas Mussweiler

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×