The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Are performance differences of interest operators statistically significant?

Are performance differences of interest operators statistically significant?
Are performance differences of interest operators statistically significant?
The differences in performance of a range of interest operators are examined in a null hypothesis framework using McNemar’s test on a widely-used database of images, to ascertain whether these apparent differences are statistically significant. It is found that some performance differences are indeed statistically significant, though most of them are at a fairly low level of confidence, i.e. with about a 1-in-20 chance that the results could be due to features of the evaluation database. A new evaluation measure i.e. accurate homography estimation is used to characterize the performance of feature extraction algorithms.Results suggest that operators employing longer descriptors are more reliable.
Feature Extraction, Homography, McNemar's Test
429-436
Springer
Kanwal, Nadia
636e56ff-8bec-4857-815d-1d458ee81d69
Ehsan, Shoaib
ae8922f0-dbe0-4b22-8474-98e84d852de7
Clark, Adrian F.
81c08359-a1fe-4380-adc0-2da681e19df0
Real, P
Diaz-Pernil, D
Molina-Abril, H
Berciano, A
Kropatsch, W
Kanwal, Nadia
636e56ff-8bec-4857-815d-1d458ee81d69
Ehsan, Shoaib
ae8922f0-dbe0-4b22-8474-98e84d852de7
Clark, Adrian F.
81c08359-a1fe-4380-adc0-2da681e19df0
Real, P
Diaz-Pernil, D
Molina-Abril, H
Berciano, A
Kropatsch, W

Kanwal, Nadia, Ehsan, Shoaib and Clark, Adrian F. (2011) Are performance differences of interest operators statistically significant? In, Real, P, Diaz-Pernil, D, Molina-Abril, H, Berciano, A and Kropatsch, W (eds.) Computer analysis of images and patterns: CAIP 2011. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6855) Springer, pp. 429-436. (doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23678-5_51).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

The differences in performance of a range of interest operators are examined in a null hypothesis framework using McNemar’s test on a widely-used database of images, to ascertain whether these apparent differences are statistically significant. It is found that some performance differences are indeed statistically significant, though most of them are at a fairly low level of confidence, i.e. with about a 1-in-20 chance that the results could be due to features of the evaluation database. A new evaluation measure i.e. accurate homography estimation is used to characterize the performance of feature extraction algorithms.Results suggest that operators employing longer descriptors are more reliable.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2011
Keywords: Feature Extraction, Homography, McNemar's Test

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 478884
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/478884
PURE UUID: 5aa747a9-cf97-4123-9c78-d39481040e52
ORCID for Shoaib Ehsan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9631-1898

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Jul 2023 16:38
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:16

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nadia Kanwal
Author: Shoaib Ehsan ORCID iD
Author: Adrian F. Clark
Editor: P Real
Editor: D Diaz-Pernil
Editor: H Molina-Abril
Editor: A Berciano
Editor: W Kropatsch

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×