The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Impact of Advanced Access on access, workload, and continuity: controlled before-and-after and simulated-patient study

Salisbury, C., Montgomery, A.A., Simons, L., Sampson, F., Edwards, S., Baxter, H., Goodall, S., Smith, H., Lattimer, V. and Pickin, M.D. (2007) Impact of Advanced Access on access, workload, and continuity: controlled before-and-after and simulated-patient study British Journal of General Practice, 57, (541), pp. 608-614.

Record type: Article


Background: Case studies from the US suggest that Advanced Access appointment systems lead to shorter delays for appointments, reduced workload, and increased continuity of care.
Aim: To determine whether implementation of Advanced Access in general practice is associated with the above benefits in the UK.
Design of study: Controlled before-and-after and simulated-patient study.
Setting: Twenty-four practices that had implemented Advanced Access and 24 that had not.
Method: Anonymous telephone calls were made monthly to request an appointment. Numbers of appointments and patients consulting were calculated from practice records. Continuity was determined from anonymised patient records.
Results: The wait for an appointment with any doctor was slightly shorter at Advanced Access practices than control practices (mean 1.00 day and 1.87 days respectively, adjusted difference ?0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] = ?1.51 to 0.004 days). Advanced Access practices met the NHS Plan 48-hour access target on 71% of occasions and control practices on 60% of occasions (adjusted odds ratio 1.61; 95% CI = 0.78 to 3.31; P = 0.200). The number of appointments offered, and patients seen, increased at both Advanced Access and control practices over the period studied, with no evidence of differences between them. There was no difference between Advanced Access and control practices in continuity of care (adjusted difference 0.003; 95% CI = ?0.07 to 0.07).
Conclusion: Advanced Access practices provided slightly shorter waits for an appointment compared with control practices, but performance against NHS access targets was considerably poorer than officially reported for both types of practice. Advanced Access practices did not have reduced workload or increased continuity of care.

PDF 47916.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: August 2007
Keywords: appointment systems, continuity of patient care, family practice, health services accessibility, workload


Local EPrints ID: 47916
ISSN: 0960-1643
PURE UUID: 2f714f3e-2cee-492b-84d8-de65fedadb69

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Aug 2007
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 15:01

Export record


Author: C. Salisbury
Author: A.A. Montgomery
Author: L. Simons
Author: F. Sampson
Author: S. Edwards
Author: H. Baxter
Author: S. Goodall
Author: H. Smith
Author: V. Lattimer
Author: M.D. Pickin

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.