Information choice in a social learning experiment
Information choice in a social learning experiment
We document heterogeneity of rationality and bias in information acquisition in a social learning experiment, where subjects, prior to guessing an unknown binary state of the world, must choose between receiving a private signal or seeing social information containing the guesses made by previous subjects in the sequence - rather than observing both pieces of information as in the classic design of Anderson and Holt (1997). By requiring subjects to make this information choice at different points in the sequence, our within-subject design allows us to separate biased from optimal information choices. Overall, the majority of subjects exhibit a suboptimal bias in favor of choosing social rather than private information, consistent with underestimating both mistakes made by other subjects and the frequency of uninformative social information. Furthermore, a substantial minority behave according to a refined equilibrium prediction, while some subjects consistently choose social information and others consistently choose private information.
295-315
Ma, Mingye
02348e28-7d7b-4cb9-a67f-88669be07a3e
Duffy, John
c72c4d14-2350-416e-a7cf-d5e8c2ded75c
Hopkins, Ed
05fbe5d2-eb5d-4330-8ffe-1b165db86cba
Kornienko, Tatiana
39a15497-83e0-4410-bb0b-564b960ac0a9
1 October 2019
Ma, Mingye
02348e28-7d7b-4cb9-a67f-88669be07a3e
Duffy, John
c72c4d14-2350-416e-a7cf-d5e8c2ded75c
Hopkins, Ed
05fbe5d2-eb5d-4330-8ffe-1b165db86cba
Kornienko, Tatiana
39a15497-83e0-4410-bb0b-564b960ac0a9
Ma, Mingye, Duffy, John, Hopkins, Ed and Kornienko, Tatiana
(2019)
Information choice in a social learning experiment.
Games and Economic Behavior, 118, .
(doi:10.1016/j.geb.2019.06.008).
Abstract
We document heterogeneity of rationality and bias in information acquisition in a social learning experiment, where subjects, prior to guessing an unknown binary state of the world, must choose between receiving a private signal or seeing social information containing the guesses made by previous subjects in the sequence - rather than observing both pieces of information as in the classic design of Anderson and Holt (1997). By requiring subjects to make this information choice at different points in the sequence, our within-subject design allows us to separate biased from optimal information choices. Overall, the majority of subjects exhibit a suboptimal bias in favor of choosing social rather than private information, consistent with underestimating both mistakes made by other subjects and the frequency of uninformative social information. Furthermore, a substantial minority behave according to a refined equilibrium prediction, while some subjects consistently choose social information and others consistently choose private information.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 25 September 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 September 2019
Published date: 1 October 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 479183
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/479183
ISSN: 0899-8256
PURE UUID: 451e48a7-c5db-4940-9328-ab72041001ae
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Jul 2023 16:43
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 01:25
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Mingye Ma
Author:
John Duffy
Author:
Ed Hopkins
Author:
Tatiana Kornienko
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics