Policy response to globalization: A comparison between China's and India's primary education
Policy response to globalization: A comparison between China's and India's primary education
How is China’s and India’s primary education influenced by
globalization and what exactly are their policy responses? This question
is important not only because globalization is perceived to have profound
influences on education policies at almost all levels in all countries, but such
manifestation also remains less scrutinized in two of the largest primary
education sectors in the world. This paper intends to fill this gap with a
comparative case study that is informed by Johnson’s (2006) framework on
the historical and political forces that shape education policy trajectories.
Responses from the Chinese and Indian sides are critically analyzed in
terms of both universalization of primary education as a policy goal,
and decentralization as a policy instrument. The results show that while
convergence is often observed on policy rhetoric and general policy objectives,
it is less so when it comes to structures and processes, as the role of national
government in the two countries remains critical in “buying” policies from the
global “market” based on their own terms and conditions. Yet to reach towards
the“politics of gelling” that involves a wider set of interest groups, subtle yet
nonetheless critical distinctions should be made between such role assertion on
one hand and excessive control on the other.
76-102
Yan, Yifei
58cf8978-8af4-4efb-ba84-2437ee5fca11
April 2018
Yan, Yifei
58cf8978-8af4-4efb-ba84-2437ee5fca11
Yan, Yifei
(2018)
Policy response to globalization: A comparison between China's and India's primary education.
Asian Education Review, 2 (1), .
Abstract
How is China’s and India’s primary education influenced by
globalization and what exactly are their policy responses? This question
is important not only because globalization is perceived to have profound
influences on education policies at almost all levels in all countries, but such
manifestation also remains less scrutinized in two of the largest primary
education sectors in the world. This paper intends to fill this gap with a
comparative case study that is informed by Johnson’s (2006) framework on
the historical and political forces that shape education policy trajectories.
Responses from the Chinese and Indian sides are critically analyzed in
terms of both universalization of primary education as a policy goal,
and decentralization as a policy instrument. The results show that while
convergence is often observed on policy rhetoric and general policy objectives,
it is less so when it comes to structures and processes, as the role of national
government in the two countries remains critical in “buying” policies from the
global “market” based on their own terms and conditions. Yet to reach towards
the“politics of gelling” that involves a wider set of interest groups, subtle yet
nonetheless critical distinctions should be made between such role assertion on
one hand and excessive control on the other.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: April 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 479279
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/479279
PURE UUID: 48ad8f27-ecb8-4f40-8e5a-630d2f67efe5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Jul 2023 16:51
Last modified: 21 Jul 2023 02:01
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Yifei Yan
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics