The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Auditing the auditors: A performative ‘spectacle’ of public oversight

Auditing the auditors: A performative ‘spectacle’ of public oversight
Auditing the auditors: A performative ‘spectacle’ of public oversight

Purpose: This paper analyses the establishment and evolution of a public oversight body (POB) – the Egyptian Audit Oversight Unit (AOU) – and its implications for local auditing firms and practices. Design/methodology/approach: Primary data were gathered from 34 semi-structured interviews (including follow-up ones) between 2014 and 2020. Secondary data was obtained through publicly available documents and internal memos. Drawing on Debord's (1967) Society of the Spectacle, the insights focus on the POB's conception, materialisation and evolution in a context characterised by weak regulatory structures. Findings: Through a series of acts, the findings reveal how the AOU first accepted the image of “international best practice” oversight (the “metaphorical”), followed by the construction of the local structure and décor replicating a United States (US) style POB archetype (the “transformational”) by primarily relying on visible processes/procedures. Yet, these mechanisms emphasised the spectacular nature of oversight, with little improvement for practice and limiting itself to “cracking down” on smaller local firms. A final stage (the “performative”) reveals how the AOU seeks to expand its activities beyond its original mandate without challenging the image-driven nature of its oversight. Originality/value: The paper offers two key contributions. First, it reveals how actors, through a combination of symbolic and tangible measures, create a new performative reality of public oversight. Second, it advocates Debord's “spectacle” to complement other theoretical lenses, with a view to illuminating the materialisation stages that bridge the gap between proclaimed oversight policies and actual practices (including conscious and unconscious omissions) within a given political economy context.

Developing countries, Egypt, Auditing, Spectacle, Public Oversight Board, PCAOB Archetype, Public oversight board, Egypt, Developing countries, PCAOB archetype, Spectacle, Auditing
0951-3574
Marnet, Oliver
6840910e-2e26-4e63-aa84-76c5c8d27877
Ghattas, Peter Brince Mikhail
d24ab1ef-b046-4823-ab50-5a381e9ea53d
Soobaroyen, Teerooven
6686e2f8-564f-4f7f-b079-9dc8a2f53a48
Uddin, Shahzad
bcfb99b3-f724-4f44-a68e-48053d5cada8
Marnet, Oliver
6840910e-2e26-4e63-aa84-76c5c8d27877
Ghattas, Peter Brince Mikhail
d24ab1ef-b046-4823-ab50-5a381e9ea53d
Soobaroyen, Teerooven
6686e2f8-564f-4f7f-b079-9dc8a2f53a48
Uddin, Shahzad
bcfb99b3-f724-4f44-a68e-48053d5cada8

Marnet, Oliver, Ghattas, Peter Brince Mikhail, Soobaroyen, Teerooven and Uddin, Shahzad (2023) Auditing the auditors: A performative ‘spectacle’ of public oversight. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. (doi:10.1108/AAAJ-08-2022-5957). (In Press)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: This paper analyses the establishment and evolution of a public oversight body (POB) – the Egyptian Audit Oversight Unit (AOU) – and its implications for local auditing firms and practices. Design/methodology/approach: Primary data were gathered from 34 semi-structured interviews (including follow-up ones) between 2014 and 2020. Secondary data was obtained through publicly available documents and internal memos. Drawing on Debord's (1967) Society of the Spectacle, the insights focus on the POB's conception, materialisation and evolution in a context characterised by weak regulatory structures. Findings: Through a series of acts, the findings reveal how the AOU first accepted the image of “international best practice” oversight (the “metaphorical”), followed by the construction of the local structure and décor replicating a United States (US) style POB archetype (the “transformational”) by primarily relying on visible processes/procedures. Yet, these mechanisms emphasised the spectacular nature of oversight, with little improvement for practice and limiting itself to “cracking down” on smaller local firms. A final stage (the “performative”) reveals how the AOU seeks to expand its activities beyond its original mandate without challenging the image-driven nature of its oversight. Originality/value: The paper offers two key contributions. First, it reveals how actors, through a combination of symbolic and tangible measures, create a new performative reality of public oversight. Second, it advocates Debord's “spectacle” to complement other theoretical lenses, with a view to illuminating the materialisation stages that bridge the gap between proclaimed oversight policies and actual practices (including conscious and unconscious omissions) within a given political economy context.

Other
PDF_Proof - Accepted Manuscript
Download (657kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 29 June 2023
Additional Information: Emerald allows authors to deposit their AAM under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial International Licence 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0). To do this, the deposit must clearly state that the AAM is deposited under this licence and that any reuse is allowed in accordance with the terms outlined by the licence. To reuse the AAM for commercial purposes, permission should be sought by contacting permissions@emerald.com. Emerald appreciates that some authors may not wish to use the CC BY-NC licence; in this case, you should deposit the AAM and include the copyright line of the published article. Should you have any questions about our licensing policies, please contact permissions@emerald.com. For more infor-mation on the deposit licenses, please see our deposit information: https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/our-services/authors/author-policies/author-rights#deposit
Keywords: Developing countries, Egypt, Auditing, Spectacle, Public Oversight Board, PCAOB Archetype, Public oversight board, Egypt, Developing countries, PCAOB archetype, Spectacle, Auditing

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 479568
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/479568
ISSN: 0951-3574
PURE UUID: 35695779-bf63-4a0f-ab8d-1bff9cbe693e
ORCID for Oliver Marnet: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9450-2332
ORCID for Teerooven Soobaroyen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3340-1666

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Jul 2023 16:38
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 04:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Oliver Marnet ORCID iD
Author: Peter Brince Mikhail Ghattas
Author: Teerooven Soobaroyen ORCID iD
Author: Shahzad Uddin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×