Better stuck together or free to go? Of the stability of cooperation when individuals have outside options
Better stuck together or free to go? Of the stability of cooperation when individuals have outside options
How do outside options affect cooperation? We examine the stability of cooperation and the reasons for exit in public projects with stochastic outcomes, imperfect monitoring and an exit option. We find that treatments with high barriers to exit generate higher welfare overall as they foster stability and prevent inefficient separation of pairs. There is excessive exit in treatments with low barriers to exit, driven in part by an overestimate of the likelihood that the peer will leave and a desire not to be left alone in the public project. We contrast long-term “strategic” and short-term “egoistic” drivers of exit and find that short-term cost-benefit considerations play a more important role in treatments with lower barriers to exit.
99-112
Gaudeul, Alexia
386eae3b-229a-4985-a904-d8a3eb887f24
Crosetto, Paolo
1df877fd-252e-4221-867f-689195ae08a0
Riener, Gerhard
8e8e27a6-4931-4e70-b223-688f3fd616c1
April 2017
Gaudeul, Alexia
386eae3b-229a-4985-a904-d8a3eb887f24
Crosetto, Paolo
1df877fd-252e-4221-867f-689195ae08a0
Riener, Gerhard
8e8e27a6-4931-4e70-b223-688f3fd616c1
Gaudeul, Alexia, Crosetto, Paolo and Riener, Gerhard
(2017)
Better stuck together or free to go? Of the stability of cooperation when individuals have outside options.
Journal of Economic Psychology, 59, .
(doi:10.1016/j.joep.2017.01.005).
Abstract
How do outside options affect cooperation? We examine the stability of cooperation and the reasons for exit in public projects with stochastic outcomes, imperfect monitoring and an exit option. We find that treatments with high barriers to exit generate higher welfare overall as they foster stability and prevent inefficient separation of pairs. There is excessive exit in treatments with low barriers to exit, driven in part by an overestimate of the likelihood that the peer will leave and a desire not to be left alone in the public project. We contrast long-term “strategic” and short-term “egoistic” drivers of exit and find that short-term cost-benefit considerations play a more important role in treatments with lower barriers to exit.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 18 January 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 22 March 2017
Published date: April 2017
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 479579
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/479579
ISSN: 0167-4870
PURE UUID: cb2fbac1-13e1-4925-925e-052a460d3f28
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Jul 2023 16:38
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Alexia Gaudeul
Author:
Paolo Crosetto
Author:
Gerhard Riener
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics