The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Power increases anchoring effects on judgment

Power increases anchoring effects on judgment
Power increases anchoring effects on judgment
Four experiments test the impact of power (versus powerlessness) on anchoring effects. Anchoring refers to the tendency to assimilate one's judgment to a previously considered numeric standard. Based on the notion that power facilitates the activation of and reliance on accessible information, we hypothesized that power increases numeric anchoring effects on judgment, compared to powerlessness. Across studies, we found consistent support for this idea, when testing estimations of factual values (Experiments 1 and 2), subjective evaluations (Experiment 3), and negotiation behavior (Experiment 4). The findings of Studies 2 to 4 qualify the dominant idea in power literature that power reduces conformity to others' opinion. Power increases conformity to others' opinion, if such opinion is presented as an anchor and therefore processed more automatically. These findings also have important methodological implications for power research. They show that differences in stimulus presentation can steer observed effects of power in opposite directions.
0278-016X
40-53
Lammers, Joris
2ccc6d72-5266-48bf-8229-bc6b86efc2ac
Burgmer, Pascal
c8c43b56-572c-4242-800c-9f44ff648cec
Lammers, Joris
2ccc6d72-5266-48bf-8229-bc6b86efc2ac
Burgmer, Pascal
c8c43b56-572c-4242-800c-9f44ff648cec

Lammers, Joris and Burgmer, Pascal (2017) Power increases anchoring effects on judgment. Social Cognition, 35 (1), 40-53. (doi:10.1521/soco.2017.35.1.40).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Four experiments test the impact of power (versus powerlessness) on anchoring effects. Anchoring refers to the tendency to assimilate one's judgment to a previously considered numeric standard. Based on the notion that power facilitates the activation of and reliance on accessible information, we hypothesized that power increases numeric anchoring effects on judgment, compared to powerlessness. Across studies, we found consistent support for this idea, when testing estimations of factual values (Experiments 1 and 2), subjective evaluations (Experiment 3), and negotiation behavior (Experiment 4). The findings of Studies 2 to 4 qualify the dominant idea in power literature that power reduces conformity to others' opinion. Power increases conformity to others' opinion, if such opinion is presented as an anchor and therefore processed more automatically. These findings also have important methodological implications for power research. They show that differences in stimulus presentation can steer observed effects of power in opposite directions.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 February 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 479601
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/479601
ISSN: 0278-016X
PURE UUID: 4a6e37ff-eae7-4c1f-b59b-fc36e465adae

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Jul 2023 16:40
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Joris Lammers
Author: Pascal Burgmer

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×