The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Equity in health care financing: The case of Malaysia

Equity in health care financing: The case of Malaysia
Equity in health care financing: The case of Malaysia

BACKGROUND: Equitable financing is a key objective of health care systems. Its importance is evidenced in policy documents, policy statements, the work of health economists and policy analysts. The conventional categorisations of finance sources for health care are taxation, social health insurance, private health insurance and out-of-pocket payments. There are nonetheless increasing variations in the finance sources used to fund health care. An understanding of the equity implications would help policy makers in achieving equitable financing.

OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this paper was to comprehensively assess the equity of health care financing in Malaysia, which represents a new country context for the quantitative techniques used. The paper evaluated each of the five financing sources (direct taxes, indirect taxes, contributions to Employee Provident Fund and Social Security Organization, private insurance and out-of-pocket payments) independently, and subsequently by combined the financing sources to evaluate the whole financing system.

METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses were performed on the Household Expenditure Survey Malaysia 1998/99, using Stata statistical software package. In order to assess inequality, progressivity of each finance sources and the whole financing system was measured by Kakwani's progressivity index.

RESULTS: Results showed that Malaysia's predominantly tax-financed system was slightly progressive with a Kakwani's progressivity index of 0.186. The net progressive effect was produced by four progressive finance sources (in the decreasing order of direct taxes, private insurance premiums, out-of-pocket payments, contributions to EPF and SOCSO) and a regressive finance source (indirect taxes).

CONCLUSION: Malaysia's two tier health system, of a heavily subsidised public sector and a user charged private sector, has produced a progressive health financing system. The case of Malaysia exemplifies that policy makers can gain an in depth understanding of the equity impact, in order to help shape health financing strategies for the nation.

1475-9276
Yu, Chai Ping
f0572cc8-2bb4-42ab-a43a-820814551693
Whynes, David K
0f347f72-ed96-449b-8a76-40bc42dc283e
Sach, Tracey H
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Yu, Chai Ping
f0572cc8-2bb4-42ab-a43a-820814551693
Whynes, David K
0f347f72-ed96-449b-8a76-40bc42dc283e
Sach, Tracey H
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2

Yu, Chai Ping, Whynes, David K and Sach, Tracey H (2008) Equity in health care financing: The case of Malaysia. International Journal for Equity in Health, 7, [15]. (doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-15).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Equitable financing is a key objective of health care systems. Its importance is evidenced in policy documents, policy statements, the work of health economists and policy analysts. The conventional categorisations of finance sources for health care are taxation, social health insurance, private health insurance and out-of-pocket payments. There are nonetheless increasing variations in the finance sources used to fund health care. An understanding of the equity implications would help policy makers in achieving equitable financing.

OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this paper was to comprehensively assess the equity of health care financing in Malaysia, which represents a new country context for the quantitative techniques used. The paper evaluated each of the five financing sources (direct taxes, indirect taxes, contributions to Employee Provident Fund and Social Security Organization, private insurance and out-of-pocket payments) independently, and subsequently by combined the financing sources to evaluate the whole financing system.

METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses were performed on the Household Expenditure Survey Malaysia 1998/99, using Stata statistical software package. In order to assess inequality, progressivity of each finance sources and the whole financing system was measured by Kakwani's progressivity index.

RESULTS: Results showed that Malaysia's predominantly tax-financed system was slightly progressive with a Kakwani's progressivity index of 0.186. The net progressive effect was produced by four progressive finance sources (in the decreasing order of direct taxes, private insurance premiums, out-of-pocket payments, contributions to EPF and SOCSO) and a regressive finance source (indirect taxes).

CONCLUSION: Malaysia's two tier health system, of a heavily subsidised public sector and a user charged private sector, has produced a progressive health financing system. The case of Malaysia exemplifies that policy makers can gain an in depth understanding of the equity impact, in order to help shape health financing strategies for the nation.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 9 June 2008
Published date: 9 June 2008

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 479728
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/479728
ISSN: 1475-9276
PURE UUID: 0512d353-44b1-4bb9-9a78-11ba482c8c74
ORCID for Tracey H Sach: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-9220

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Jul 2023 16:54
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:20

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Chai Ping Yu
Author: David K Whynes
Author: Tracey H Sach ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×