The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

“Clipping an angel’s wings”: on the value and limitations of philosophy in management research

“Clipping an angel’s wings”: on the value and limitations of philosophy in management research
“Clipping an angel’s wings”: on the value and limitations of philosophy in management research
Ramoglou and McMullen (2022) offers a logically rigorous extension and refinement of earlier work on the conceptual foundations of entrepreneurship theory – the actualization perspective of entrepreneurship. Leunbach (2023) and Mitchell, Israelsen, Mitchell & Hua (2023) have crafted two thoughtful and highly scholarly commentaries that help augment this theoretical perspective. The backbone of our rejoinder is the rebuttal of Leunbach’s criticism of our rejection of metaphysics. We clarify that there is nothing problematic with metaphysics in the sense of abstract theorizing, philosophical questions, or uncertain answers. What is nevertheless problematic is the metaphysics that emerge when linguistic confusions derail our academic imagination. In defending our approach, we further demonstrate that the practice of “clipping an angel’s wings” – i.e., the practice of disciplining our theoretical imagination by means of philosophical analysis – is not a purely destructive endeavor. Far from that: the analytic method has a highly constructive component as well: it helps us increase conceptual clarity by laying out the ground rules that prevent our theoretical developments from becoming “nothing but houses of cards” (Wittgenstein, 1958: 118).
0363-7425
Ramoglou, Stratos
f3fffbf5-0f1f-46e1-93af-a13e18945610
McMullen, Jeffery S.
d2374544-f8a3-4f6c-b5f9-159d4144e28a
Ramoglou, Stratos
f3fffbf5-0f1f-46e1-93af-a13e18945610
McMullen, Jeffery S.
d2374544-f8a3-4f6c-b5f9-159d4144e28a

Ramoglou, Stratos and McMullen, Jeffery S. (2023) “Clipping an angel’s wings”: on the value and limitations of philosophy in management research. Academy of Management Review. (doi:10.5465/amr.2023.0228).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Ramoglou and McMullen (2022) offers a logically rigorous extension and refinement of earlier work on the conceptual foundations of entrepreneurship theory – the actualization perspective of entrepreneurship. Leunbach (2023) and Mitchell, Israelsen, Mitchell & Hua (2023) have crafted two thoughtful and highly scholarly commentaries that help augment this theoretical perspective. The backbone of our rejoinder is the rebuttal of Leunbach’s criticism of our rejection of metaphysics. We clarify that there is nothing problematic with metaphysics in the sense of abstract theorizing, philosophical questions, or uncertain answers. What is nevertheless problematic is the metaphysics that emerge when linguistic confusions derail our academic imagination. In defending our approach, we further demonstrate that the practice of “clipping an angel’s wings” – i.e., the practice of disciplining our theoretical imagination by means of philosophical analysis – is not a purely destructive endeavor. Far from that: the analytic method has a highly constructive component as well: it helps us increase conceptual clarity by laying out the ground rules that prevent our theoretical developments from becoming “nothing but houses of cards” (Wittgenstein, 1958: 118).

Text
AMR-2023-0228.final - Accepted Manuscript
Download (98kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 July 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 14 July 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 479942
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/479942
ISSN: 0363-7425
PURE UUID: a5b3d59d-7837-496e-be37-ca61a98def2e
ORCID for Stratos Ramoglou: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5134-5525

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Jul 2023 16:38
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 04:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jeffery S. McMullen

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×