The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Machine learning to predict environmental dose rates from a radionuclide therapy service: a proof of concept study

Machine learning to predict environmental dose rates from a radionuclide therapy service: a proof of concept study
Machine learning to predict environmental dose rates from a radionuclide therapy service: a proof of concept study
The Ionising Radiation Regulations 2017 requires prior risk assessment calculations and regular environmental monitoring of radiation doses. However, the accuracy of prior risk assessments is limited by assumptions and monitoring only provides retrospective evaluation. This is particularly challenging in nuclear medicine for areas surrounding radionuclide therapy patient bathroom wastewater pipework. Machine learning (ML) is a technique that could be applied to patient booking records to predict environmental radiation dose rates in these areas to aid prospective risk assessment calculations, which this proof-of-concept work investigates. 540 days of a dosimeters historical daily average dose rate measurements and the corresponding period of department therapy booking records were used to train six different ML models. Predicted versus measured daily average dose rates for the following 60 days were analysed to assess and compare model performance. A wide range in prediction errors was observed across models. The gradient boosting regressor produced the best accuracy (root mean squared error = 1.10µSv.hr-1, mean absolute error = 0.87µSv.hr-1, mean absolute percentage error = 35% and maximum error = 3.26µSv.hr-1) and goodness of fit (R2= 0.411). Methods to improve model performance and other scenarios where this approach could prove more accurate were identified. This work demonstrates that ML can predict temporal fluctuations in environmental radiation dose rates in the areas surrounding radionuclide therapy wastewater pipework and indicates that it has the potential to play a role in improving legislative compliance, the accuracy of radiation safety and use of staff time and resources.
artificial intelligence, environmental monitoring, legislative compliance, machine learning, radiation protection, radionuclide therapy
0952-4746
Meades, Richard
5222c9d9-524a-4a6e-9ca7-2c3d4f4b0d9a
Page, Joanne
6f06c4a6-1208-4b80-b4c6-27a22d438ae0
Ross, James Clark
01f0b1a4-7f20-4283-b0b4-6b9c8534170e
McCool, Daniel
cbba008c-60ad-4cba-b922-db2029d4a9dd
Meades, Richard
5222c9d9-524a-4a6e-9ca7-2c3d4f4b0d9a
Page, Joanne
6f06c4a6-1208-4b80-b4c6-27a22d438ae0
Ross, James Clark
01f0b1a4-7f20-4283-b0b4-6b9c8534170e
McCool, Daniel
cbba008c-60ad-4cba-b922-db2029d4a9dd

Meades, Richard, Page, Joanne, Ross, James Clark and McCool, Daniel (2023) Machine learning to predict environmental dose rates from a radionuclide therapy service: a proof of concept study. Journal of Radiological Protection, 43 (3), [031501]. (doi:10.1088/1361-6498/ace1fa).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The Ionising Radiation Regulations 2017 requires prior risk assessment calculations and regular environmental monitoring of radiation doses. However, the accuracy of prior risk assessments is limited by assumptions and monitoring only provides retrospective evaluation. This is particularly challenging in nuclear medicine for areas surrounding radionuclide therapy patient bathroom wastewater pipework. Machine learning (ML) is a technique that could be applied to patient booking records to predict environmental radiation dose rates in these areas to aid prospective risk assessment calculations, which this proof-of-concept work investigates. 540 days of a dosimeters historical daily average dose rate measurements and the corresponding period of department therapy booking records were used to train six different ML models. Predicted versus measured daily average dose rates for the following 60 days were analysed to assess and compare model performance. A wide range in prediction errors was observed across models. The gradient boosting regressor produced the best accuracy (root mean squared error = 1.10µSv.hr-1, mean absolute error = 0.87µSv.hr-1, mean absolute percentage error = 35% and maximum error = 3.26µSv.hr-1) and goodness of fit (R2= 0.411). Methods to improve model performance and other scenarios where this approach could prove more accurate were identified. This work demonstrates that ML can predict temporal fluctuations in environmental radiation dose rates in the areas surrounding radionuclide therapy wastewater pipework and indicates that it has the potential to play a role in improving legislative compliance, the accuracy of radiation safety and use of staff time and resources.

Text
Meades_2023_J._Radiol._Prot._43_031501 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 7 July 2024.
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 27 June 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 July 2023
Published date: 1 September 2023
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Society for Radiological Protection. Published on behalf of SRP by IOP Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
Keywords: artificial intelligence, environmental monitoring, legislative compliance, machine learning, radiation protection, radionuclide therapy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 479987
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/479987
ISSN: 0952-4746
PURE UUID: 38c2c7a8-37be-4aa0-a52a-d5e269a25065
ORCID for James Clark Ross: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8626-2041

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Jul 2023 17:02
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:03

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Richard Meades
Author: Joanne Page
Author: Daniel McCool

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×