Inclusive research, in-/exclusion and ethics: after the spatial turn
Inclusive research, in-/exclusion and ethics: after the spatial turn
In discussions of in-/exclusion in education, attention often focuses on place and the in/out binary. There have been efforts to progress the debate from whether the child or young person is inside/outside the ordinary school or classroom to the quality of their participation and learning experience. This is less a detraction from attending to space than a recognition that it is space not place that matters most to inclusion;recognises the nature of sites of learning as space is socially produced, dynamic spaces, performing the power relations and identities of those who occupy, appropriate and construct themit. This chapter examines the ethics of the ways in which researchers enter schools and classrooms and engage with their spatial-temporal dimensions, implicitly or explicitly protecting, reinforcing or disrupting the power those spaces perform. It explores the implications of researchers’ engagement with teachers and students (and teachers) as they negotiate ways of researching together for understanding inclusion and it addresses questions of what inclusive research creates space for, who can occupy research spaces, and the creation of new spaces. The chapter explores potential changes to the spatial dynamic from adopting an insider or alongsider stance, bringing different ways of knowing closer together and into dialogue.
Inclusion, exclusion, Inclusive education, Inclusive research, space, insider/outsider, belonging
Nind, Melanie
b1e294c7-0014-483e-9320-e2a0346dffef
Nind, Melanie
b1e294c7-0014-483e-9320-e2a0346dffef
Nind, Melanie
(2023)
Inclusive research, in-/exclusion and ethics: after the spatial turn.
In,
Rißler, Georg, Köpfer, Andreas and Buchner, Tobias
(eds.)
Interdisciplinary Approaches to Space in Inclusive Education: Beyond the Spatial Turn.
Routledge.
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
In discussions of in-/exclusion in education, attention often focuses on place and the in/out binary. There have been efforts to progress the debate from whether the child or young person is inside/outside the ordinary school or classroom to the quality of their participation and learning experience. This is less a detraction from attending to space than a recognition that it is space not place that matters most to inclusion;recognises the nature of sites of learning as space is socially produced, dynamic spaces, performing the power relations and identities of those who occupy, appropriate and construct themit. This chapter examines the ethics of the ways in which researchers enter schools and classrooms and engage with their spatial-temporal dimensions, implicitly or explicitly protecting, reinforcing or disrupting the power those spaces perform. It explores the implications of researchers’ engagement with teachers and students (and teachers) as they negotiate ways of researching together for understanding inclusion and it addresses questions of what inclusive research creates space for, who can occupy research spaces, and the creation of new spaces. The chapter explores potential changes to the spatial dynamic from adopting an insider or alongsider stance, bringing different ways of knowing closer together and into dialogue.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 December 2023
Keywords:
Inclusion, exclusion, Inclusive education, Inclusive research, space, insider/outsider, belonging
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 480001
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480001
PURE UUID: 8969e701-689b-4456-acbd-b0129de0dca0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Aug 2023 16:30
Last modified: 02 Aug 2023 01:47
Export record
Contributors
Editor:
Georg Rißler
Editor:
Andreas Köpfer
Editor:
Tobias Buchner
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics