How ‘lofty’ art can help the medical world reimagine mental health
How ‘lofty’ art can help the medical world reimagine mental health
We are in the midst of a global mental health crisis, according to a recent review by the Lancet medical journal. Our “collective failure” to respond to this crisis results in “monumental loss of human capabilities and avoidable suffering”. The development of 20 antipsychotics and 30 antidepressants over the past four decades has not improved the morbidity or mortality of mental disorders. In England, mental illness costs £105.2 billion annually. People consider the stigma around mental health worse than the illness itself.
Evidently, to bring about policy and cultural change, we need to think outside the pillbox. A recent governmental report in the UK puts forward a robust argument for how the arts can “stimulate imagination and reflection” and “change perspectives”. Art therapy, for example, can improve conditions like dementia. But this report is concerned with the quality of the artistic activity “rather than that of the output”. It rejects art that is “lofty activity which requires some sort of superior cultural intelligence to access”.
But the quality of the artistic output is a salient part of transforming how we see mental health, if it is to stop being something shameful and negative. Art stimulates and changes perspectives because it engages and develops cultural intelligence. Surely different forms of art – including those of the “lofty” variety – must also play a role in rectifying our collective failure?
Tan, Kai Syng
ac184aa0-8e5b-4802-a725-80daa6231c86
Asherson, Philip
e90ab23d-1849-4f54-99e9-8a894306f957
31 October 2018
Tan, Kai Syng
ac184aa0-8e5b-4802-a725-80daa6231c86
Asherson, Philip
e90ab23d-1849-4f54-99e9-8a894306f957
Tan, Kai Syng and Asherson, Philip
(2018)
How ‘lofty’ art can help the medical world reimagine mental health.
Abstract
We are in the midst of a global mental health crisis, according to a recent review by the Lancet medical journal. Our “collective failure” to respond to this crisis results in “monumental loss of human capabilities and avoidable suffering”. The development of 20 antipsychotics and 30 antidepressants over the past four decades has not improved the morbidity or mortality of mental disorders. In England, mental illness costs £105.2 billion annually. People consider the stigma around mental health worse than the illness itself.
Evidently, to bring about policy and cultural change, we need to think outside the pillbox. A recent governmental report in the UK puts forward a robust argument for how the arts can “stimulate imagination and reflection” and “change perspectives”. Art therapy, for example, can improve conditions like dementia. But this report is concerned with the quality of the artistic activity “rather than that of the output”. It rejects art that is “lofty activity which requires some sort of superior cultural intelligence to access”.
But the quality of the artistic output is a salient part of transforming how we see mental health, if it is to stop being something shameful and negative. Art stimulates and changes perspectives because it engages and develops cultural intelligence. Surely different forms of art – including those of the “lofty” variety – must also play a role in rectifying our collective failure?
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 31 October 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 480242
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480242
PURE UUID: ad3d261b-ddb2-4c1a-b3da-76bf15c576ee
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Aug 2023 17:11
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:21
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Kai Syng Tan
Author:
Philip Asherson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics