Improving the accuracy and timeliness of medication allergy documentation in the intensive care unit
Improving the accuracy and timeliness of medication allergy documentation in the intensive care unit
Aim: To ascertain the adherence to allergy policy within the intensive care unit, to put in place robust processes to improve the timeliness and accuracy of allergy documentation, and to assess the impact of any interventions.
Design: A retrospective audit of patients’ electronic ICU and hospital written medical records with implementation of key process changes followed by a reaudit 11 months later.
Setting: A 30-bedded tertiary referral adult intensive care unit.
Results: Allergy was common (29–39%). In the initial audit medicines (excluding emergency medicines) were prescribed for 30 patients (52%) before allergy status was documented, with antimicrobials being prescribed for 12 patients (21%); these were reduced to 15 (19%) and four (5%), respectively, in the repeat audit (p=0.01). Agreement between the written medical record before ICU and the ICU medical record improved from 78% to 94% (p=0.01). The key process changes implemented were: mandatory documentation of allergy in the electronic medical record; clinical pharmacists undertaking responsibility for allergy reconciliation as part of medicines reconciliation; and ongoing education of the junior doctors at ICU induction.
Conclusions: The accuracy and timeliness of allergy documentation improved with a systems-wide approach encompassing education, enhanced back-up processes and software solutions. Allergy documentation should be considered as a marker for safety and quality within ICU.
McKenzie, Cathrine
ec344dee-5777-49c5-970e-6326e82c9f8c
Hatton, Katie
debdf5bf-c105-48d9-992c-5605c68f95be
Barrett, Nicholas
69127e83-19d9-4e51-b7e1-f1bd7192cf7e
1 November 2011
McKenzie, Cathrine
ec344dee-5777-49c5-970e-6326e82c9f8c
Hatton, Katie
debdf5bf-c105-48d9-992c-5605c68f95be
Barrett, Nicholas
69127e83-19d9-4e51-b7e1-f1bd7192cf7e
McKenzie, Cathrine, Hatton, Katie and Barrett, Nicholas
(2011)
Improving the accuracy and timeliness of medication allergy documentation in the intensive care unit.
Pharmaceutical Journal.
Abstract
Aim: To ascertain the adherence to allergy policy within the intensive care unit, to put in place robust processes to improve the timeliness and accuracy of allergy documentation, and to assess the impact of any interventions.
Design: A retrospective audit of patients’ electronic ICU and hospital written medical records with implementation of key process changes followed by a reaudit 11 months later.
Setting: A 30-bedded tertiary referral adult intensive care unit.
Results: Allergy was common (29–39%). In the initial audit medicines (excluding emergency medicines) were prescribed for 30 patients (52%) before allergy status was documented, with antimicrobials being prescribed for 12 patients (21%); these were reduced to 15 (19%) and four (5%), respectively, in the repeat audit (p=0.01). Agreement between the written medical record before ICU and the ICU medical record improved from 78% to 94% (p=0.01). The key process changes implemented were: mandatory documentation of allergy in the electronic medical record; clinical pharmacists undertaking responsibility for allergy reconciliation as part of medicines reconciliation; and ongoing education of the junior doctors at ICU induction.
Conclusions: The accuracy and timeliness of allergy documentation improved with a systems-wide approach encompassing education, enhanced back-up processes and software solutions. Allergy documentation should be considered as a marker for safety and quality within ICU.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 November 2011
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 480329
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480329
ISSN: 0031-6873
PURE UUID: 38c89f12-4f04-4200-9b8d-b9100a8794e8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Aug 2023 17:22
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:23
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Cathrine McKenzie
Author:
Katie Hatton
Author:
Nicholas Barrett
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics