Research review: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in narrow constructs of restricted and repetitive behaviours and interests in autistic children, adolescents, and adults
Research review: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in narrow constructs of restricted and repetitive behaviours and interests in autistic children, adolescents, and adults
Background: Evidence that autism often manifests differently between males and females is growing, particularly in terms of social interaction and communication, but it is unclear if there are sex differences in restricted and repetitive behaviours and interests (RRBIs) when rigorously focusing on the narrow construct level (i.e., stereotyped behaviour, restricted interests, insistence on sameness, and/or sensory experiences). Methods: We conducted a systematic review and four random effects meta-analyses investigating sex differences in narrow construct measures of RRBIs in autistic children, adolescents, and adults (Prospero registration ID: CRD42021254221). Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Results: Forty-six studies were narratively synthesised and 25 of these were included in four random effects meta-analyses. Results found that autistic males had significantly higher levels of stereotyped behaviours (SMD = 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.09, 0.33], p <.001) and restricted interests (SMD = 0.18, 95% CI [0.07, 0.29], p <.001) compared to autistic females. In contrast, there were no significant sex differences for sensory experiences (SMD = −0.09, 95% CI [−0.27, 0.09], p =.32) and insistence on sameness (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI [−0.03, 0.05], p =.68). The findings from the narrative synthesis were generally consistent with those from the meta-analyses and also found qualitative sex differences in the way RRBIs manifest. Conclusions: Our findings show significant differences in narrowly defined RRBIs in males and females. Practitioners need to be aware of such differences, which could be contributing to the under-recognition of autism in females and may not be captured by current diagnostic instruments.
Autism, gender differences, meta-analysis, restricted and repetitive behaviours and interests, sex differences, systematic review
4-17
Edwards, Hannah
87bb90c8-f522-48a4-9c47-1e788d165e4d
Wright, Sarah
0112d62f-dc04-4919-8bb4-5bd9ec2f825f
Sargeant, Cora
b2235859-1454-4d8b-8098-a539eea3a1ca
Cortese, Samuele
53d4bf2c-4e0e-4c77-9385-218350560fdb
Wood-Downie, Henry
3ea6dda6-516f-4bc8-9854-186540fb30e0
January 2024
Edwards, Hannah
87bb90c8-f522-48a4-9c47-1e788d165e4d
Wright, Sarah
0112d62f-dc04-4919-8bb4-5bd9ec2f825f
Sargeant, Cora
b2235859-1454-4d8b-8098-a539eea3a1ca
Cortese, Samuele
53d4bf2c-4e0e-4c77-9385-218350560fdb
Wood-Downie, Henry
3ea6dda6-516f-4bc8-9854-186540fb30e0
Edwards, Hannah, Wright, Sarah, Sargeant, Cora, Cortese, Samuele and Wood-Downie, Henry
(2024)
Research review: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in narrow constructs of restricted and repetitive behaviours and interests in autistic children, adolescents, and adults.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 65 (1), .
(doi:10.1111/jcpp.13855).
Abstract
Background: Evidence that autism often manifests differently between males and females is growing, particularly in terms of social interaction and communication, but it is unclear if there are sex differences in restricted and repetitive behaviours and interests (RRBIs) when rigorously focusing on the narrow construct level (i.e., stereotyped behaviour, restricted interests, insistence on sameness, and/or sensory experiences). Methods: We conducted a systematic review and four random effects meta-analyses investigating sex differences in narrow construct measures of RRBIs in autistic children, adolescents, and adults (Prospero registration ID: CRD42021254221). Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Results: Forty-six studies were narratively synthesised and 25 of these were included in four random effects meta-analyses. Results found that autistic males had significantly higher levels of stereotyped behaviours (SMD = 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.09, 0.33], p <.001) and restricted interests (SMD = 0.18, 95% CI [0.07, 0.29], p <.001) compared to autistic females. In contrast, there were no significant sex differences for sensory experiences (SMD = −0.09, 95% CI [−0.27, 0.09], p =.32) and insistence on sameness (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI [−0.03, 0.05], p =.68). The findings from the narrative synthesis were generally consistent with those from the meta-analyses and also found qualitative sex differences in the way RRBIs manifest. Conclusions: Our findings show significant differences in narrowly defined RRBIs in males and females. Practitioners need to be aware of such differences, which could be contributing to the under-recognition of autism in females and may not be captured by current diagnostic instruments.
Text
Child Psychology Psychiatry - 2023 - Edwards
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 13 May 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 July 2023
Published date: January 2024
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.
Keywords:
Autism, gender differences, meta-analysis, restricted and repetitive behaviours and interests, sex differences, systematic review
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 480499
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480499
ISSN: 1469-7610
PURE UUID: 4b8ecf29-021d-453a-8880-b5aaca8ed2e8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Aug 2023 16:41
Last modified: 16 Jan 2025 03:03
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Hannah Edwards
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
