The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Semirigid bolted endplate moment connections: review and experimental-based assessment of available predictive models

Semirigid bolted endplate moment connections: review and experimental-based assessment of available predictive models
Semirigid bolted endplate moment connections: review and experimental-based assessment of available predictive models

Semirigid bolted endplate moment connections are widely used in construction practice. These connections are mainly designed to resist gravity, wind, and low to moderate seismic loads. In elastoplastic designs and nonlinear system-level simulations, it is key to accurately predict or model the connection response (i.e., stiffness, strength, and ductility), rather than employing the simplified pinned or rigid idealization. Several researchers developed different empirical, analytical, and mechanical models within the past five decades to predict the connection's full response or key response parameters. These models are generally developed and validated based on a limited experimental and/or simulation data set; hence, their accuracy and general applicability are not well established. The potential limitations of existing models arise from the complexity of flexible connections' response due to the multitude of deforming components and the interactions between them. Accordingly, the objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of existing numerical models and their main assumptions and features, and to assess their accuracy. Emphasis is placed on flush and extended endplate connections, being the most commonly used connection types. The robustness of 16 numerical models was thoroughly assessed using an experimental database of more than 1,200 specimens that was recently collated. The assessment demonstrates the inaccuracy of existing models in predicting the connection fundamental response quantities, particularly the elastic rotational stiffness and ductility. The advantages and disadvantages of each model are highlighted to guide future efforts to develop more accurate models in support of performance-based engineering.

0733-9445
Ding, Zizhou
d2f57f07-1ba2-4fce-8eca-f3cfae32dd6a
Elkady, Ahmed
8e55de89-dff4-4f84-90ed-6af476e328a8
Ding, Zizhou
d2f57f07-1ba2-4fce-8eca-f3cfae32dd6a
Elkady, Ahmed
8e55de89-dff4-4f84-90ed-6af476e328a8

Ding, Zizhou and Elkady, Ahmed (2023) Semirigid bolted endplate moment connections: review and experimental-based assessment of available predictive models. Journal of Structural Engineering (United States), 149 (9), [04023117]. (doi:10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11797).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Semirigid bolted endplate moment connections are widely used in construction practice. These connections are mainly designed to resist gravity, wind, and low to moderate seismic loads. In elastoplastic designs and nonlinear system-level simulations, it is key to accurately predict or model the connection response (i.e., stiffness, strength, and ductility), rather than employing the simplified pinned or rigid idealization. Several researchers developed different empirical, analytical, and mechanical models within the past five decades to predict the connection's full response or key response parameters. These models are generally developed and validated based on a limited experimental and/or simulation data set; hence, their accuracy and general applicability are not well established. The potential limitations of existing models arise from the complexity of flexible connections' response due to the multitude of deforming components and the interactions between them. Accordingly, the objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of existing numerical models and their main assumptions and features, and to assess their accuracy. Emphasis is placed on flush and extended endplate connections, being the most commonly used connection types. The robustness of 16 numerical models was thoroughly assessed using an experimental database of more than 1,200 specimens that was recently collated. The assessment demonstrates the inaccuracy of existing models in predicting the connection fundamental response quantities, particularly the elastic rotational stiffness and ductility. The advantages and disadvantages of each model are highlighted to guide future efforts to develop more accurate models in support of performance-based engineering.

Text
PrePrint_Ding_Elkady2023 - Accepted Manuscript
Download (4MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 13 April 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 22 June 2023
Published date: 1 September 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: This work was conducted at the National Infrastructure Laboratory, University of Southampton (UoS). The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by UoS to the first author as part of his graduate research. This material may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the American Society of Civil Engineers. This material may be found at https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11797 in the ASCE Library or Civil Engineering Database.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 480527
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480527
ISSN: 0733-9445
PURE UUID: e93d2e1b-441c-47c5-9fb1-137cccfa595f
ORCID for Ahmed Elkady: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1214-6379

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Aug 2023 16:31
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:53

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Zizhou Ding
Author: Ahmed Elkady ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×