The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review

Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review
Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review

Background: The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) has been recommended as a cost-effective method to assess physical activity. Several studies validating the IPAQ-SF have been conducted with differing results, but no systematic review of these studies has been reported.Methods: The keywords "IPAQ", "validation", and "validity" were searched in PubMed and Scopus. Studies published in English that validated the IPAQ-SF against an objective physical activity measuring device, doubly labeled water, or an objective fitness measure were included.Results: Twenty-three validation studies were included in this review. There was a great deal of variability in the methods used across studies, but the results were largely similar. Correlations between the total physical activity level measured by the IPAQ-SF and objective standards ranged from 0.09 to 0.39; none reached the minimal acceptable standard in the literature (0.50 for objective activity measuring devices, 0.40 for fitness measures). Correlations between sections of the IPAQ-SF for vigorous activity or moderate activity level/walking and an objective standard showed even greater variability (-0.18 to 0.76), yet several reached the minimal acceptable standard. Only six studies provided comparisons between physical activity levels derived from the IPAQ-SF and those obtained from objective criterion. In most studies the IPAQ-SF overestimated physical activity level by 36 to 173 percent; one study underestimated by 28 percent.Conclusions: The correlation between the IPAQ-SF and objective measures of activity or fitness in the large majority of studies was lower than the acceptable standard. Furthermore, the IPAQ-SF typically overestimated physical activity as measured by objective criterion by an average of 84 percent. Hence, the evidence to support the use of the IPAQ-SF as an indicator of relative or absolute physical activity is weak.

1479-5868
Lee, Paul H.
02620eab-ae7f-4a1c-bad1-8a50e7e48951
Macfarlane, Duncan J.
9e6efb95-49a0-472a-97d0-26735bff7389
Lam, TH H.
342e044c-2bbc-413c-b3fb-ad2c399b5fb7
Stewart, Sunita M.
0a7cdd7b-a005-43fa-9b62-f648894630fe
Lee, Paul H.
02620eab-ae7f-4a1c-bad1-8a50e7e48951
Macfarlane, Duncan J.
9e6efb95-49a0-472a-97d0-26735bff7389
Lam, TH H.
342e044c-2bbc-413c-b3fb-ad2c399b5fb7
Stewart, Sunita M.
0a7cdd7b-a005-43fa-9b62-f648894630fe

Lee, Paul H., Macfarlane, Duncan J., Lam, TH H. and Stewart, Sunita M. (2011) Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8, [115]. (doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-115).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Background: The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) has been recommended as a cost-effective method to assess physical activity. Several studies validating the IPAQ-SF have been conducted with differing results, but no systematic review of these studies has been reported.Methods: The keywords "IPAQ", "validation", and "validity" were searched in PubMed and Scopus. Studies published in English that validated the IPAQ-SF against an objective physical activity measuring device, doubly labeled water, or an objective fitness measure were included.Results: Twenty-three validation studies were included in this review. There was a great deal of variability in the methods used across studies, but the results were largely similar. Correlations between the total physical activity level measured by the IPAQ-SF and objective standards ranged from 0.09 to 0.39; none reached the minimal acceptable standard in the literature (0.50 for objective activity measuring devices, 0.40 for fitness measures). Correlations between sections of the IPAQ-SF for vigorous activity or moderate activity level/walking and an objective standard showed even greater variability (-0.18 to 0.76), yet several reached the minimal acceptable standard. Only six studies provided comparisons between physical activity levels derived from the IPAQ-SF and those obtained from objective criterion. In most studies the IPAQ-SF overestimated physical activity level by 36 to 173 percent; one study underestimated by 28 percent.Conclusions: The correlation between the IPAQ-SF and objective measures of activity or fitness in the large majority of studies was lower than the acceptable standard. Furthermore, the IPAQ-SF typically overestimated physical activity as measured by objective criterion by an average of 84 percent. Hence, the evidence to support the use of the IPAQ-SF as an indicator of relative or absolute physical activity is weak.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 21 October 2011
Additional Information: Funding Information: This research was part of the project “FAMILY: A Jockey Club Initiative for a Harmonious Society” funded by the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 480699
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480699
ISSN: 1479-5868
PURE UUID: 6bf56831-ba59-44b6-8c91-5b5b951692f4
ORCID for Paul H. Lee: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5729-6450

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Aug 2023 16:52
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Paul H. Lee ORCID iD
Author: Duncan J. Macfarlane
Author: TH H. Lam
Author: Sunita M. Stewart

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×