Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review
Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review
Background: The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) has been recommended as a cost-effective method to assess physical activity. Several studies validating the IPAQ-SF have been conducted with differing results, but no systematic review of these studies has been reported.Methods: The keywords "IPAQ", "validation", and "validity" were searched in PubMed and Scopus. Studies published in English that validated the IPAQ-SF against an objective physical activity measuring device, doubly labeled water, or an objective fitness measure were included.Results: Twenty-three validation studies were included in this review. There was a great deal of variability in the methods used across studies, but the results were largely similar. Correlations between the total physical activity level measured by the IPAQ-SF and objective standards ranged from 0.09 to 0.39; none reached the minimal acceptable standard in the literature (0.50 for objective activity measuring devices, 0.40 for fitness measures). Correlations between sections of the IPAQ-SF for vigorous activity or moderate activity level/walking and an objective standard showed even greater variability (-0.18 to 0.76), yet several reached the minimal acceptable standard. Only six studies provided comparisons between physical activity levels derived from the IPAQ-SF and those obtained from objective criterion. In most studies the IPAQ-SF overestimated physical activity level by 36 to 173 percent; one study underestimated by 28 percent.Conclusions: The correlation between the IPAQ-SF and objective measures of activity or fitness in the large majority of studies was lower than the acceptable standard. Furthermore, the IPAQ-SF typically overestimated physical activity as measured by objective criterion by an average of 84 percent. Hence, the evidence to support the use of the IPAQ-SF as an indicator of relative or absolute physical activity is weak.
Lee, Paul H.
02620eab-ae7f-4a1c-bad1-8a50e7e48951
Macfarlane, Duncan J.
9e6efb95-49a0-472a-97d0-26735bff7389
Lam, TH H.
342e044c-2bbc-413c-b3fb-ad2c399b5fb7
Stewart, Sunita M.
0a7cdd7b-a005-43fa-9b62-f648894630fe
21 October 2011
Lee, Paul H.
02620eab-ae7f-4a1c-bad1-8a50e7e48951
Macfarlane, Duncan J.
9e6efb95-49a0-472a-97d0-26735bff7389
Lam, TH H.
342e044c-2bbc-413c-b3fb-ad2c399b5fb7
Stewart, Sunita M.
0a7cdd7b-a005-43fa-9b62-f648894630fe
Lee, Paul H., Macfarlane, Duncan J., Lam, TH H. and Stewart, Sunita M.
(2011)
Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review.
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8, [115].
(doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-115).
Abstract
Background: The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) has been recommended as a cost-effective method to assess physical activity. Several studies validating the IPAQ-SF have been conducted with differing results, but no systematic review of these studies has been reported.Methods: The keywords "IPAQ", "validation", and "validity" were searched in PubMed and Scopus. Studies published in English that validated the IPAQ-SF against an objective physical activity measuring device, doubly labeled water, or an objective fitness measure were included.Results: Twenty-three validation studies were included in this review. There was a great deal of variability in the methods used across studies, but the results were largely similar. Correlations between the total physical activity level measured by the IPAQ-SF and objective standards ranged from 0.09 to 0.39; none reached the minimal acceptable standard in the literature (0.50 for objective activity measuring devices, 0.40 for fitness measures). Correlations between sections of the IPAQ-SF for vigorous activity or moderate activity level/walking and an objective standard showed even greater variability (-0.18 to 0.76), yet several reached the minimal acceptable standard. Only six studies provided comparisons between physical activity levels derived from the IPAQ-SF and those obtained from objective criterion. In most studies the IPAQ-SF overestimated physical activity level by 36 to 173 percent; one study underestimated by 28 percent.Conclusions: The correlation between the IPAQ-SF and objective measures of activity or fitness in the large majority of studies was lower than the acceptable standard. Furthermore, the IPAQ-SF typically overestimated physical activity as measured by objective criterion by an average of 84 percent. Hence, the evidence to support the use of the IPAQ-SF as an indicator of relative or absolute physical activity is weak.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 21 October 2011
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
This research was part of the project “FAMILY: A Jockey Club Initiative for a Harmonious Society” funded by the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 480699
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480699
ISSN: 1479-5868
PURE UUID: 6bf56831-ba59-44b6-8c91-5b5b951692f4
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Aug 2023 16:52
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:09
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Paul H. Lee
Author:
Duncan J. Macfarlane
Author:
TH H. Lam
Author:
Sunita M. Stewart
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics