The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Development and validation of prediction models and risk calculators for post-hepatectomy liver failure and postoperative complications using a diverse international cohort of major hepatectomies

Development and validation of prediction models and risk calculators for post-hepatectomy liver failure and postoperative complications using a diverse international cohort of major hepatectomies
Development and validation of prediction models and risk calculators for post-hepatectomy liver failure and postoperative complications using a diverse international cohort of major hepatectomies

Objective: The study aim was to develop and validate models to predict clinically significant posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and serious complications [a Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)>40] using preoperative and intraoperative variables. Background: PHLF is a serious complication after major hepatectomy but does not comprehensively capture a patient's postoperative course. Adding the CCI as an additional metric can account for complications unrelated to liver function. Methods: The cohort included adult patients who underwent major hepatectomies at 12 international centers (2010-2020). After splitting the data into training and validation sets (70:30), models for PHLF and a CCI>40 were fit using logistic regression with a lasso penalty on the training cohort. The models were then evaluated on the validation data set. Results: Among 2192 patients, 185 (8.4%) had clinically significant PHLF and 160 (7.3%) had a CCI>40. The PHLF model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80, calibration slope of 0.95, and calibration-in-the-large of -0.09, while the CCI model had an AUC of 0.76, calibration slope of 0.88, and calibration-in-the-large of 0.02. When the models were provided only preoperative variables to predict PHLF and a CCI>40, this resulted in similar AUCs of 0.78 and 0.71, respectively. Both models were used to build 2 risk calculators with the option to include or exclude intraoperative variables (PHLF Risk Calculator; CCI>40 Risk Calculator). Conclusions: Using an international cohort of major hepatectomy patients, we used preoperative and intraoperative variables to develop and internally validate multivariable models to predict clinically significant PHLF and a CCI>40 with good discrimination and calibration.

comprehensive complication index, major hepatectomy, posthepatectomy liver failure, postoperative outcomes, prediction model
0003-4932
976-984
Wang, Jaeyun Jane
93783eef-bd6e-4842-96c3-4750569b59ac
Feng, Jean
ca48953c-d4e2-4781-959c-9545be76c69c
Gomes, Camilla
f259f0e4-5017-4be4-b513-5afc36a3fef1
Calthorpe, Lucia
6b33bbe5-84e3-486c-9bf5-42b381b84359
Ashraf Ganjouei, Amir
92456be5-9963-46df-b655-7636a5ac9e1a
Romero-Hernandez, Fernanda
32545851-3680-43f1-852b-cd0e6d555fdc
Benedetti Cacciaguerra, Andrea
0295d195-bfef-4cf6-8144-15f32ce39170
Hibi, Taizo
f0f06c1a-a9e7-407f-8bb8-bd77b64a6a1e
Abdelgadir Adam, Mohamed
bb861c32-69c5-470f-9856-ce5ccdd2076a
Alseidi, Adnan
56ccae5a-69f6-424b-8921-0f73bfff0d60
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47
Rashidian, Nikdokht
c1830f16-15bf-457f-8a45-c8ab5e9c1016
Primrose, John
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
International Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure Study Group
Wang, Jaeyun Jane
93783eef-bd6e-4842-96c3-4750569b59ac
Feng, Jean
ca48953c-d4e2-4781-959c-9545be76c69c
Gomes, Camilla
f259f0e4-5017-4be4-b513-5afc36a3fef1
Calthorpe, Lucia
6b33bbe5-84e3-486c-9bf5-42b381b84359
Ashraf Ganjouei, Amir
92456be5-9963-46df-b655-7636a5ac9e1a
Romero-Hernandez, Fernanda
32545851-3680-43f1-852b-cd0e6d555fdc
Benedetti Cacciaguerra, Andrea
0295d195-bfef-4cf6-8144-15f32ce39170
Hibi, Taizo
f0f06c1a-a9e7-407f-8bb8-bd77b64a6a1e
Abdelgadir Adam, Mohamed
bb861c32-69c5-470f-9856-ce5ccdd2076a
Alseidi, Adnan
56ccae5a-69f6-424b-8921-0f73bfff0d60
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47
Rashidian, Nikdokht
c1830f16-15bf-457f-8a45-c8ab5e9c1016
Primrose, John
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185

Wang, Jaeyun Jane, Feng, Jean, Gomes, Camilla, Calthorpe, Lucia, Ashraf Ganjouei, Amir, Romero-Hernandez, Fernanda, Benedetti Cacciaguerra, Andrea, Hibi, Taizo, Abdelgadir Adam, Mohamed, Alseidi, Adnan, Abu Hilal, Mohammad and Rashidian, Nikdokht , International Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure Study Group (2023) Development and validation of prediction models and risk calculators for post-hepatectomy liver failure and postoperative complications using a diverse international cohort of major hepatectomies. Annals of Surgery, 278 (6), 976-984. (doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005916).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: The study aim was to develop and validate models to predict clinically significant posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and serious complications [a Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)>40] using preoperative and intraoperative variables. Background: PHLF is a serious complication after major hepatectomy but does not comprehensively capture a patient's postoperative course. Adding the CCI as an additional metric can account for complications unrelated to liver function. Methods: The cohort included adult patients who underwent major hepatectomies at 12 international centers (2010-2020). After splitting the data into training and validation sets (70:30), models for PHLF and a CCI>40 were fit using logistic regression with a lasso penalty on the training cohort. The models were then evaluated on the validation data set. Results: Among 2192 patients, 185 (8.4%) had clinically significant PHLF and 160 (7.3%) had a CCI>40. The PHLF model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80, calibration slope of 0.95, and calibration-in-the-large of -0.09, while the CCI model had an AUC of 0.76, calibration slope of 0.88, and calibration-in-the-large of 0.02. When the models were provided only preoperative variables to predict PHLF and a CCI>40, this resulted in similar AUCs of 0.78 and 0.71, respectively. Both models were used to build 2 risk calculators with the option to include or exclude intraoperative variables (PHLF Risk Calculator; CCI>40 Risk Calculator). Conclusions: Using an international cohort of major hepatectomy patients, we used preoperative and intraoperative variables to develop and internally validate multivariable models to predict clinically significant PHLF and a CCI>40 with good discrimination and calibration.

Text
Development_and_Validation_of_Prediction_Models.476 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 11 May 2024.
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 May 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 May 2023
Published date: 1 December 2023
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
Keywords: comprehensive complication index, major hepatectomy, posthepatectomy liver failure, postoperative outcomes, prediction model

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 480707
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480707
ISSN: 0003-4932
PURE UUID: 3a0c21be-c301-44b9-b3ee-3d98d2c7e4fd
ORCID for John Primrose: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-7605

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Aug 2023 16:53
Last modified: 13 Apr 2024 01:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jaeyun Jane Wang
Author: Jean Feng
Author: Camilla Gomes
Author: Lucia Calthorpe
Author: Amir Ashraf Ganjouei
Author: Fernanda Romero-Hernandez
Author: Andrea Benedetti Cacciaguerra
Author: Taizo Hibi
Author: Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam
Author: Adnan Alseidi
Author: Mohammad Abu Hilal
Author: Nikdokht Rashidian
Author: John Primrose ORCID iD
Corporate Author: International Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure Study Group

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×