The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

An individually randomised controlled multi-centre pragmatic trial with embedded economic and process evaluations of early vocational rehabilitation compared with usual care for stroke survivors: study protocol for the RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) trial

An individually randomised controlled multi-centre pragmatic trial with embedded economic and process evaluations of early vocational rehabilitation compared with usual care for stroke survivors: study protocol for the RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) trial
An individually randomised controlled multi-centre pragmatic trial with embedded economic and process evaluations of early vocational rehabilitation compared with usual care for stroke survivors: study protocol for the RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) trial

BACKGROUND: Return to work (RTW) is achieved by less than 50% of stroke survivors. The rising incidence of stroke among younger people, the UK economic forecast, and clinical drivers highlight the need for stroke survivors to receive support with RTW. However, evidence for this type of support is lacking. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) will investigate whether Early Stroke Specialist Vocational Rehabilitation (ESSVR) plus usual care (UC) (i.e. usual NHS rehabilitation) is more clinically and cost-effective for supporting post-stroke RTW, than UC alone.

METHODS: Seven hundred sixty stroke survivors and their carers will be recruited from approximately 20 NHS stroke services. A 5:4 allocation ratio will be employed to randomise participants to receive ESSVR plus UC, or UC alone. The individually tailored ESSVR intervention will commence within 12 weeks of stroke onset and be delivered for up to 12 months as necessary by trained RETAKE occupational therapists in the community, participants' homes or workplaces, and outpatient/inpatient therapy settings, via telephone, email, or SMS text message. Outcome data will be collected via self-report questionnaires administered by post or online at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up. The primary outcome will be self-reported RTW and job retention at 12 months (minimum 2 h/week). Secondary outcomes will include mood, function, participation, health-related quality of life, confidence, intervention compliance, health and social care resource use, and mortality. An embedded economic evaluation will estimate cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses from National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services (PSS) perspectives. An embedded process evaluation will employ a mixed methods approach to explore ESSVR implementation, contextual factors linked to outcome variation, and factors affecting NHS roll-out.

DISCUSSION: This article describes the protocol for a multi-centre RCT evaluating the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of an early vocational rehabilitation intervention aimed at supporting adults to return to work following a stroke. Evidence favouring the ESSVR intervention would support its roll-out in NHS settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN12464275 . Registered on 26 February 2018.

Adult, Caregivers, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Return to Work, Stroke/diagnosis, Stroke Rehabilitation, Survivors
1745-6215
1010
Radford, Kathryn A
df2aa34f-45ad-426c-801a-ef242dd15b25
Craven, Kristelle
150f1cc9-2ed5-4347-ae86-19a4c04869a6
McLellan, Vicki
f63a0a99-f24d-4d30-9119-e9994e63b043
Sach, Tracey H
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Brindle, Richard
99d25c25-ff8f-4916-ab54-fc82237f4374
Holloway, Ivana
7e2ab643-b205-4960-a6f1-8ccb0e324c76
Hartley, Suzanne
3773e30f-8799-41fd-8608-a28750aff0bf
Bowen, Audrey
feaf6503-6f21-4a8c-a7e4-1259c1f6e381
O'Connor, Rory
32dcebb6-f40e-49b6-8f1d-0824b9a1ce68
Stevens, Judith
8088dede-6065-400a-b981-10c7a93c08c3
Philips, Julie
1ddb0972-4be8-401b-b490-e47624e85b90
Walker, Marion
5beae64c-40b3-4a9b-a67f-b5fb293235a3
Holmes, Jain
e4d14097-c72a-4a25-ae03-bdefecec9874
McKevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570
Murray, John
22b23dff-7c01-41d8-8940-32feb87572e3
Watkins, Caroline
a1c10647-cc4c-4d4d-aeeb-70f00ec810a1
Powers, Katie
4d1b0dce-f773-405f-91b8-cd3b4ec92806
Shone, Angela
16e777b8-6399-4a97-9204-3ae6cdbc2fbd
Farrin, Amanda
9e87b2c8-00bb-4f5f-ab96-862620877c5e
Radford, Kathryn A
df2aa34f-45ad-426c-801a-ef242dd15b25
Craven, Kristelle
150f1cc9-2ed5-4347-ae86-19a4c04869a6
McLellan, Vicki
f63a0a99-f24d-4d30-9119-e9994e63b043
Sach, Tracey H
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Brindle, Richard
99d25c25-ff8f-4916-ab54-fc82237f4374
Holloway, Ivana
7e2ab643-b205-4960-a6f1-8ccb0e324c76
Hartley, Suzanne
3773e30f-8799-41fd-8608-a28750aff0bf
Bowen, Audrey
feaf6503-6f21-4a8c-a7e4-1259c1f6e381
O'Connor, Rory
32dcebb6-f40e-49b6-8f1d-0824b9a1ce68
Stevens, Judith
8088dede-6065-400a-b981-10c7a93c08c3
Philips, Julie
1ddb0972-4be8-401b-b490-e47624e85b90
Walker, Marion
5beae64c-40b3-4a9b-a67f-b5fb293235a3
Holmes, Jain
e4d14097-c72a-4a25-ae03-bdefecec9874
McKevitt, Christopher
4ff3bb8f-7931-4402-b68d-53aae1cd5570
Murray, John
22b23dff-7c01-41d8-8940-32feb87572e3
Watkins, Caroline
a1c10647-cc4c-4d4d-aeeb-70f00ec810a1
Powers, Katie
4d1b0dce-f773-405f-91b8-cd3b4ec92806
Shone, Angela
16e777b8-6399-4a97-9204-3ae6cdbc2fbd
Farrin, Amanda
9e87b2c8-00bb-4f5f-ab96-862620877c5e

Radford, Kathryn A, Craven, Kristelle, McLellan, Vicki, Sach, Tracey H, Brindle, Richard, Holloway, Ivana, Hartley, Suzanne, Bowen, Audrey, O'Connor, Rory, Stevens, Judith, Philips, Julie, Walker, Marion, Holmes, Jain, McKevitt, Christopher, Murray, John, Watkins, Caroline, Powers, Katie, Shone, Angela and Farrin, Amanda (2020) An individually randomised controlled multi-centre pragmatic trial with embedded economic and process evaluations of early vocational rehabilitation compared with usual care for stroke survivors: study protocol for the RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) trial. Trials, 21 (1), 1010. (doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04883-1).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Return to work (RTW) is achieved by less than 50% of stroke survivors. The rising incidence of stroke among younger people, the UK economic forecast, and clinical drivers highlight the need for stroke survivors to receive support with RTW. However, evidence for this type of support is lacking. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) will investigate whether Early Stroke Specialist Vocational Rehabilitation (ESSVR) plus usual care (UC) (i.e. usual NHS rehabilitation) is more clinically and cost-effective for supporting post-stroke RTW, than UC alone.

METHODS: Seven hundred sixty stroke survivors and their carers will be recruited from approximately 20 NHS stroke services. A 5:4 allocation ratio will be employed to randomise participants to receive ESSVR plus UC, or UC alone. The individually tailored ESSVR intervention will commence within 12 weeks of stroke onset and be delivered for up to 12 months as necessary by trained RETAKE occupational therapists in the community, participants' homes or workplaces, and outpatient/inpatient therapy settings, via telephone, email, or SMS text message. Outcome data will be collected via self-report questionnaires administered by post or online at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up. The primary outcome will be self-reported RTW and job retention at 12 months (minimum 2 h/week). Secondary outcomes will include mood, function, participation, health-related quality of life, confidence, intervention compliance, health and social care resource use, and mortality. An embedded economic evaluation will estimate cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses from National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services (PSS) perspectives. An embedded process evaluation will employ a mixed methods approach to explore ESSVR implementation, contextual factors linked to outcome variation, and factors affecting NHS roll-out.

DISCUSSION: This article describes the protocol for a multi-centre RCT evaluating the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of an early vocational rehabilitation intervention aimed at supporting adults to return to work following a stroke. Evidence favouring the ESSVR intervention would support its roll-out in NHS settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN12464275 . Registered on 26 February 2018.

Text
s13063-020-04883-1 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (812kB)

More information

Published date: 9 December 2020
Keywords: Adult, Caregivers, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Return to Work, Stroke/diagnosis, Stroke Rehabilitation, Survivors

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 480710
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480710
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: 473398ab-7b10-4ab9-b223-d5b705733b36
ORCID for Tracey H Sach: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-9220

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Aug 2023 16:53
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:20

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kathryn A Radford
Author: Kristelle Craven
Author: Vicki McLellan
Author: Tracey H Sach ORCID iD
Author: Richard Brindle
Author: Ivana Holloway
Author: Suzanne Hartley
Author: Audrey Bowen
Author: Rory O'Connor
Author: Judith Stevens
Author: Julie Philips
Author: Marion Walker
Author: Jain Holmes
Author: Christopher McKevitt
Author: John Murray
Author: Caroline Watkins
Author: Katie Powers
Author: Angela Shone
Author: Amanda Farrin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×