Laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy after future liver remnant modulation: a single surgeon's experience
Laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy after future liver remnant modulation: a single surgeon's experience
Background: Laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy (L-RHH) is still considered a technically complex procedure, which should only be performed by experienced surgeons in specialized centers. Future liver remnant modulation (FLRM) strategies, including portal vein embolization (PVE), and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), might increase the surgical difficulty of L-RHH, due to the distortion of hepatic anatomy, periportal inflammation, and fibrosis. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of L-RHH after FLRM, when compared with ex novo L-RHH. Methods: All consecutive right hemihepatectomies performed by a single surgeon in the period between October 2007 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes of L-RHH after FLRM and ex novo L-RHH were compared. Results: A total of 59 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 33 underwent FLRM. Patients undergoing FLRM prior to L-RHH were most often male (93.9% vs. 42.3%, p < 0.001), had an ASA-score >2 (45.5% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.006), and underwent a two-stage hepatectomy (45.5% vs. 3.8% p < 0.001). L-RHH after FLRM was associated with longer operative time (median 360 vs. 300 min, p = 0.008) and Pringle duration (31 vs. 24 min, p = 0.011). Intraoperative blood loss, unfavorable intraoperative incidents, and conversion rates were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay and 30-day overall and severe morbidity rates. Radical resection margin (R0) and textbook outcome rates were equal. One patient who underwent an extended RHH in the FLRM group deceased within 90 days of surgery, due to post-hepatectomy liver failure. Conclusion: L-RHH after FLRM is more technically complex than L-RHH ex novo, as objectified by longer operative time and Pringle duration. Nevertheless, this procedure appears safe and feasible in experienced hands.
future liver remnant modulation, laparoscopic liver resection, liver neoplasms, right hemihepatectomy, treatment outcome
Hoogteijling, Tijs J.
4ef768f4-7686-43e7-abd7-1b4b95418250
Sijberden, Jasper P.
9d954519-5768-4cc9-a6c4-2cb3a051a212
Primrose, John N.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Morrison-Jones, Victoria
42607321-18d8-4e4f-b66f-7ab3f54697b7
Modi, Sachin
1507f4a2-9733-4441-823a-666bb852e0f3
Zimmitti, Giuseppe
58cb17a9-1aa4-40b0-b04c-6c8b8687f0e6
Garatti, Marco
c2a39b57-8a8d-496d-8b2e-3e931c78d0cb
Sallemi, Claudio
3c3cc143-03bc-40c1-a6e2-7464a68d3126
Morone, Mario
19e4f5b9-2a3d-4105-b7c6-23fe3a1155ce
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47
21 May 2023
Hoogteijling, Tijs J.
4ef768f4-7686-43e7-abd7-1b4b95418250
Sijberden, Jasper P.
9d954519-5768-4cc9-a6c4-2cb3a051a212
Primrose, John N.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
Morrison-Jones, Victoria
42607321-18d8-4e4f-b66f-7ab3f54697b7
Modi, Sachin
1507f4a2-9733-4441-823a-666bb852e0f3
Zimmitti, Giuseppe
58cb17a9-1aa4-40b0-b04c-6c8b8687f0e6
Garatti, Marco
c2a39b57-8a8d-496d-8b2e-3e931c78d0cb
Sallemi, Claudio
3c3cc143-03bc-40c1-a6e2-7464a68d3126
Morone, Mario
19e4f5b9-2a3d-4105-b7c6-23fe3a1155ce
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47
Hoogteijling, Tijs J., Sijberden, Jasper P., Primrose, John N., Morrison-Jones, Victoria, Modi, Sachin, Zimmitti, Giuseppe, Garatti, Marco, Sallemi, Claudio, Morone, Mario and Abu Hilal, Mohammad
(2023)
Laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy after future liver remnant modulation: a single surgeon's experience.
Cancers, 15 (10), [2851].
(doi:10.3390/cancers15102851).
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy (L-RHH) is still considered a technically complex procedure, which should only be performed by experienced surgeons in specialized centers. Future liver remnant modulation (FLRM) strategies, including portal vein embolization (PVE), and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), might increase the surgical difficulty of L-RHH, due to the distortion of hepatic anatomy, periportal inflammation, and fibrosis. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of L-RHH after FLRM, when compared with ex novo L-RHH. Methods: All consecutive right hemihepatectomies performed by a single surgeon in the period between October 2007 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes of L-RHH after FLRM and ex novo L-RHH were compared. Results: A total of 59 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 33 underwent FLRM. Patients undergoing FLRM prior to L-RHH were most often male (93.9% vs. 42.3%, p < 0.001), had an ASA-score >2 (45.5% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.006), and underwent a two-stage hepatectomy (45.5% vs. 3.8% p < 0.001). L-RHH after FLRM was associated with longer operative time (median 360 vs. 300 min, p = 0.008) and Pringle duration (31 vs. 24 min, p = 0.011). Intraoperative blood loss, unfavorable intraoperative incidents, and conversion rates were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay and 30-day overall and severe morbidity rates. Radical resection margin (R0) and textbook outcome rates were equal. One patient who underwent an extended RHH in the FLRM group deceased within 90 days of surgery, due to post-hepatectomy liver failure. Conclusion: L-RHH after FLRM is more technically complex than L-RHH ex novo, as objectified by longer operative time and Pringle duration. Nevertheless, this procedure appears safe and feasible in experienced hands.
Text
cancers-15-02851
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 19 May 2023
Published date: 21 May 2023
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
Keywords:
future liver remnant modulation, laparoscopic liver resection, liver neoplasms, right hemihepatectomy, treatment outcome
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 480738
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480738
ISSN: 2072-6694
PURE UUID: 5ed9a8b5-7afc-4021-8a3a-9aae2f5a23db
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Aug 2023 16:50
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:40
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Tijs J. Hoogteijling
Author:
Jasper P. Sijberden
Author:
Victoria Morrison-Jones
Author:
Sachin Modi
Author:
Giuseppe Zimmitti
Author:
Marco Garatti
Author:
Claudio Sallemi
Author:
Mario Morone
Author:
Mohammad Abu Hilal
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics