The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Ways of (not) seeing: (in)visibility, equality, and the politics of recognition

Ways of (not) seeing: (in)visibility, equality, and the politics of recognition
Ways of (not) seeing: (in)visibility, equality, and the politics of recognition
This article explores the theorization of (in)visibility in Honneth, Ranciere, Cavell and Tully. It situates the work of Honneth and Ranciere against the background of Wittgenstein’s account of continuous aspect perception and aspect-change in order to draw out their accounts of invisibility and the aesthetic character of transitions to visibility. In order to develop a critical standpoint on these theoretical positions, it turns to Cavell’s concept of soul-blindness and investigates the form of invisibility through the example of racism as addressed by Gaita, Fanon and Memmi. This analysis provides the basis for a critical evaluation of the strengths and limitations of Ranciere’s and Honneth’s approaches, and leads to the proposal that Tully’s public philosophy provides a more adequate way of addressing the issues of struggle and uptake that are central to the transition from invisibility to visibility.
1440-9917
Owen, David
9fc71bca-07d1-44af-9248-1b9545265a58
Owen, David
9fc71bca-07d1-44af-9248-1b9545265a58

Owen, David (2023) Ways of (not) seeing: (in)visibility, equality, and the politics of recognition. Critical Horizons. (In Press)

Record type: Article

Abstract

This article explores the theorization of (in)visibility in Honneth, Ranciere, Cavell and Tully. It situates the work of Honneth and Ranciere against the background of Wittgenstein’s account of continuous aspect perception and aspect-change in order to draw out their accounts of invisibility and the aesthetic character of transitions to visibility. In order to develop a critical standpoint on these theoretical positions, it turns to Cavell’s concept of soul-blindness and investigates the form of invisibility through the example of racism as addressed by Gaita, Fanon and Memmi. This analysis provides the basis for a critical evaluation of the strengths and limitations of Ranciere’s and Honneth’s approaches, and leads to the proposal that Tully’s public philosophy provides a more adequate way of addressing the issues of struggle and uptake that are central to the transition from invisibility to visibility.

Text
Ways_of_not_Seeing_final_ - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 December 2024.
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 June 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 480744
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480744
ISSN: 1440-9917
PURE UUID: af3901b9-4413-4a89-bdea-d9a229a761c0
ORCID for David Owen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8865-6332

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Aug 2023 16:59
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:41

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×