Multi-model, multi-sensor estimates of global evapotranspiration: climatology, uncertainties and trends
Multi-model, multi-sensor estimates of global evapotranspiration: climatology, uncertainties and trends
Estimating evapotranspiration (ET) at continental to global scales is central to understanding the partitioning of energy and water at the earth's surface and the feedbacks with the atmosphere and biosphere, especially in the context of climate change. Recent evaluations of global estimates from remote sensing, upscaled observations, land surface models and atmospheric reanalyses indicate large uncertainty across the datasets of the order of 50% of the global annual mean value. In this paper, we explore the uncertainties in global land ET estimates using three process-based ET models and a set of remote sensing and observational based radiation and meteorological forcing datasets. Input forcings were obtained from International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) and Surface Radiation Budget (SRB). The three process-based ET models are: a surface energy balance method (SEBS), a revised Penman-Monteith (PM) model, and a modified Priestley-Taylor model. Evaluations of the radiation products from ISCCP and SRB show large differences in the components of surface radiation, and temporal inconsistencies that relate to changes in satellite sensors and retrieval algorithms. In particular, step changes in the ISCCP surface temperature and humidity data lead to spurious increases in downward and upward longwave radiation that contributes to a step change in net radiation, and the ISCCP data are not used further. An ensemble of global estimates of land surface ET are generated at daily time scale and 0.5 degree spatial resolution for 1984-2007 using two SRB radiation products (SRB and SRBqc) and the three models. Uncertainty in ET from the models is much larger than the uncertainty from the radiation data. The largest uncertainties relative to the mean annual ET are in transition zones between dry and humid regions and monsoon regions. Comparisons with previous studies and an inferred estimate of ET from long-term inferred ET indicate that the ensemble mean value is reasonable, but generally biased high globally. Long-term changes over 1984-2007 indicate a slight increase over 1984-1998 and decline thereafter, although uncertainties in the forcing radiation data and lack of direct linkage with soil moisture limitations in the models prevents attribution of these changes.
Energy and water budget, Evapotranspiration, Landflux, Penman-Monteith, Priestly-Taylor, Surface energy balance
3993-4010
Vinukollu, Raghuveer K.
8ff428ba-17eb-4318-9a82-3ed70df6d013
Meynadier, Remi
b6c164bb-3a02-4f64-bb91-e3e8e30c41a7
Sheffield, Justin
dd66575b-a4dc-4190-ad95-df2d6aaaaa6b
Wood, Eric F.
8352c1b4-4fd3-42fe-bd23-46619024f1cf
30 December 2011
Vinukollu, Raghuveer K.
8ff428ba-17eb-4318-9a82-3ed70df6d013
Meynadier, Remi
b6c164bb-3a02-4f64-bb91-e3e8e30c41a7
Sheffield, Justin
dd66575b-a4dc-4190-ad95-df2d6aaaaa6b
Wood, Eric F.
8352c1b4-4fd3-42fe-bd23-46619024f1cf
Vinukollu, Raghuveer K., Meynadier, Remi, Sheffield, Justin and Wood, Eric F.
(2011)
Multi-model, multi-sensor estimates of global evapotranspiration: climatology, uncertainties and trends.
Hydrological Processes, 25 (26), .
(doi:10.1002/hyp.8393).
Abstract
Estimating evapotranspiration (ET) at continental to global scales is central to understanding the partitioning of energy and water at the earth's surface and the feedbacks with the atmosphere and biosphere, especially in the context of climate change. Recent evaluations of global estimates from remote sensing, upscaled observations, land surface models and atmospheric reanalyses indicate large uncertainty across the datasets of the order of 50% of the global annual mean value. In this paper, we explore the uncertainties in global land ET estimates using three process-based ET models and a set of remote sensing and observational based radiation and meteorological forcing datasets. Input forcings were obtained from International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) and Surface Radiation Budget (SRB). The three process-based ET models are: a surface energy balance method (SEBS), a revised Penman-Monteith (PM) model, and a modified Priestley-Taylor model. Evaluations of the radiation products from ISCCP and SRB show large differences in the components of surface radiation, and temporal inconsistencies that relate to changes in satellite sensors and retrieval algorithms. In particular, step changes in the ISCCP surface temperature and humidity data lead to spurious increases in downward and upward longwave radiation that contributes to a step change in net radiation, and the ISCCP data are not used further. An ensemble of global estimates of land surface ET are generated at daily time scale and 0.5 degree spatial resolution for 1984-2007 using two SRB radiation products (SRB and SRBqc) and the three models. Uncertainty in ET from the models is much larger than the uncertainty from the radiation data. The largest uncertainties relative to the mean annual ET are in transition zones between dry and humid regions and monsoon regions. Comparisons with previous studies and an inferred estimate of ET from long-term inferred ET indicate that the ensemble mean value is reasonable, but generally biased high globally. Long-term changes over 1984-2007 indicate a slight increase over 1984-1998 and decline thereafter, although uncertainties in the forcing radiation data and lack of direct linkage with soil moisture limitations in the models prevents attribution of these changes.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 30 December 2011
Keywords:
Energy and water budget, Evapotranspiration, Landflux, Penman-Monteith, Priestly-Taylor, Surface energy balance
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 480747
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480747
ISSN: 0885-6087
PURE UUID: e9e677ce-7c70-484c-931b-a4a503ab08e4
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Aug 2023 17:07
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:40
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Raghuveer K. Vinukollu
Author:
Remi Meynadier
Author:
Eric F. Wood
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics