The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Men and women: beliefs about cancer and about screening

Men and women: beliefs about cancer and about screening
Men and women: beliefs about cancer and about screening

BACKGROUND: Cancer screening programmes in England are publicly-funded. Professionals' beliefs in the public health benefits of screening can conflict with individuals' entitlements to exercise informed judgement over whether or not to participate. The recognition of the importance of individual autonomy in decision making requires greater understanding of the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs upon which people's screening choices are founded. Until recently, the technology available required that cancer screening be confined to women. This study aimed to discover whether male and female perceptions of cancer and of screening differed.

METHODS: Data on the public's cancer beliefs were collected by means of a postal survey (anonymous questionnaire). Two general practices based in Nottingham and in Mansfield, in east-central England, sent questionnaires to registered patients aged 30 to 70 years. 1,808 completed questionnaires were returned for analysis, 56.5 per cent from women.

RESULTS: Women were less likely to underestimate overall cancer incidence, although each sex was more likely to cite a sex-specific cancer as being amongst the most common cancer site. In terms of risk factors, men were most uncertain about the role of stress and sexually-transmitted diseases, whereas women were more likely to rate excessive alcohol and family history as major risk factors. The majority of respondents believed the public health care system should provide cancer screening, but significantly more women than men reported having benefiting from the nationally-provided screening services. Those who were older, in better health or had longer periods of formal education were less worried about cancer than those who had illness experiences, lower incomes, or who were smokers. Actual or potential participation in bowel screening was higher amongst those who believed bowel cancer to be common and amongst men, despite women having more substantial worries about cancer than men.

CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that men's and women's differential knowledge of cancer correlates with women's closer involvement with screening. Even so, men were neither less positive about screening nor less likely to express a willingness to participate in relevant screening in the future. It is important to understand gender-related differences in knowledge and perceptions of cancer, if health promotion resources are to be allocated efficiently.

Adult, Aged, England, Female, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Male, Mass Screening/psychology, Men/psychology, Middle Aged, Neoplasms/diagnosis, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, Women/psychology
1471-2458
431
Sach, Tracey H
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Whynes, David K
0f347f72-ed96-449b-8a76-40bc42dc283e
Sach, Tracey H
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Whynes, David K
0f347f72-ed96-449b-8a76-40bc42dc283e

Sach, Tracey H and Whynes, David K (2009) Men and women: beliefs about cancer and about screening. BMC Public Health, 9, 431. (doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-431).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer screening programmes in England are publicly-funded. Professionals' beliefs in the public health benefits of screening can conflict with individuals' entitlements to exercise informed judgement over whether or not to participate. The recognition of the importance of individual autonomy in decision making requires greater understanding of the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs upon which people's screening choices are founded. Until recently, the technology available required that cancer screening be confined to women. This study aimed to discover whether male and female perceptions of cancer and of screening differed.

METHODS: Data on the public's cancer beliefs were collected by means of a postal survey (anonymous questionnaire). Two general practices based in Nottingham and in Mansfield, in east-central England, sent questionnaires to registered patients aged 30 to 70 years. 1,808 completed questionnaires were returned for analysis, 56.5 per cent from women.

RESULTS: Women were less likely to underestimate overall cancer incidence, although each sex was more likely to cite a sex-specific cancer as being amongst the most common cancer site. In terms of risk factors, men were most uncertain about the role of stress and sexually-transmitted diseases, whereas women were more likely to rate excessive alcohol and family history as major risk factors. The majority of respondents believed the public health care system should provide cancer screening, but significantly more women than men reported having benefiting from the nationally-provided screening services. Those who were older, in better health or had longer periods of formal education were less worried about cancer than those who had illness experiences, lower incomes, or who were smokers. Actual or potential participation in bowel screening was higher amongst those who believed bowel cancer to be common and amongst men, despite women having more substantial worries about cancer than men.

CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that men's and women's differential knowledge of cancer correlates with women's closer involvement with screening. Even so, men were neither less positive about screening nor less likely to express a willingness to participate in relevant screening in the future. It is important to understand gender-related differences in knowledge and perceptions of cancer, if health promotion resources are to be allocated efficiently.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 24 November 2009
Keywords: Adult, Aged, England, Female, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Male, Mass Screening/psychology, Men/psychology, Middle Aged, Neoplasms/diagnosis, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, Women/psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 480804
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480804
ISSN: 1471-2458
PURE UUID: 40420d2a-2c84-4fe6-86aa-0c0610d4b961
ORCID for Tracey H Sach: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-9220

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Aug 2023 17:14
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:20

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Tracey H Sach ORCID iD
Author: David K Whynes

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×