State intervention and vulnerable children: implementation revisited
State intervention and vulnerable children: implementation revisited
This article derives from a two year study of ‘Home Supervision’, conducted as part of a programme of research on the Children (Scotland) Act 1995. The focus is on children looked after by the local authority who are on a legal supervision order at home, primarily as a consequence of having been abused or neglected, having offended or having failed to attend school without reasonable excuse. Two assumptions, both arguably a legacy of Lipsky, are challenged: first, that non-implementation by street-level bureaucrats is in opposition to their managers; and, second, the passivity of clients in respect of policy making. It is argued that the street-level bureaucrats and managers in the Home Supervision study share assumptive worlds in respect of children on home supervision, and that clients, as agentic actors, reveal a capacity for shaping policy at the implementation stage. These issues are explored and their implications for implementation studies and child welfare are discussed.
211-227
Murray, Cathy
a7a1b99c-c260-4762-bdc2-123b74bdc2d3
Pahl, Jan
af8ebd10-771a-408b-94f2-00de4d910054
Wincup, Emma
1ba0f282-3fd5-44bd-9cce-43528d5b4b3f
April 2006
Murray, Cathy
a7a1b99c-c260-4762-bdc2-123b74bdc2d3
Pahl, Jan
af8ebd10-771a-408b-94f2-00de4d910054
Wincup, Emma
1ba0f282-3fd5-44bd-9cce-43528d5b4b3f
Murray, Cathy
,
Pahl, Jan and Wincup, Emma
(eds.)
(2006)
State intervention and vulnerable children: implementation revisited.
Journal of Social Policy, 35 (2), .
(doi:10.1017/S0047279405009499).
Abstract
This article derives from a two year study of ‘Home Supervision’, conducted as part of a programme of research on the Children (Scotland) Act 1995. The focus is on children looked after by the local authority who are on a legal supervision order at home, primarily as a consequence of having been abused or neglected, having offended or having failed to attend school without reasonable excuse. Two assumptions, both arguably a legacy of Lipsky, are challenged: first, that non-implementation by street-level bureaucrats is in opposition to their managers; and, second, the passivity of clients in respect of policy making. It is argued that the street-level bureaucrats and managers in the Home Supervision study share assumptive worlds in respect of children on home supervision, and that clients, as agentic actors, reveal a capacity for shaping policy at the implementation stage. These issues are explored and their implications for implementation studies and child welfare are discussed.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: April 2006
Organisations:
Social Work Studies
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 48082
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/48082
ISSN: 0047-2794
PURE UUID: aae526be-aa87-48b2-8320-e444c65ecdda
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Aug 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 09:42
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Cathy Murray
Editor:
Jan Pahl
Editor:
Emma Wincup
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics