Decomposing desert and tangibility effects in a charitable giving experiment
Decomposing desert and tangibility effects in a charitable giving experiment
Several papers have documented that when subjects play with standard laboratory "endowments" they make less self-interested choices than when they use money they have either earned through a laboratory task or brought from outside the lab. In the context of a charitable giving experiment we decompose this into two common artifacts of the laboratory: the intangibility of money (or experimental currency units) promised on a computer screen relative to cash in hand, and the distinct treatment of random "windfall" gains relative to earned money. While both effects are found to be significant in non-parametric tests, the former effect, which has been neglected in previous studies, has a stronger impact on total donations, while the latter effect has a greater impact on the probability of donating. These results have clear implications for experimental design, and also suggest that the availability of more abstract payment methods may increase other-regarding behavior in the field.
Altruism, Charitable giving, Experimental methodology, House money effect, Individual choice, Public goods, Tangibility
229-240
Reinstein, David
4a665c8b-3e21-418a-8cd7-9f9c3979b0bd
Riener, Gerhard
8e8e27a6-4931-4e70-b223-688f3fd616c1
March 2012
Reinstein, David
4a665c8b-3e21-418a-8cd7-9f9c3979b0bd
Riener, Gerhard
8e8e27a6-4931-4e70-b223-688f3fd616c1
Reinstein, David and Riener, Gerhard
(2012)
Decomposing desert and tangibility effects in a charitable giving experiment.
Experimental Economics, 15 (1), .
(doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9298-0).
Abstract
Several papers have documented that when subjects play with standard laboratory "endowments" they make less self-interested choices than when they use money they have either earned through a laboratory task or brought from outside the lab. In the context of a charitable giving experiment we decompose this into two common artifacts of the laboratory: the intangibility of money (or experimental currency units) promised on a computer screen relative to cash in hand, and the distinct treatment of random "windfall" gains relative to earned money. While both effects are found to be significant in non-parametric tests, the former effect, which has been neglected in previous studies, has a stronger impact on total donations, while the latter effect has a greater impact on the probability of donating. These results have clear implications for experimental design, and also suggest that the availability of more abstract payment methods may increase other-regarding behavior in the field.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: March 2012
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
Acknowledgements We would like to thank the British Academy and the Deutsche Forschungsgemein-schaft under the grant RTG 1411 for providing financial support for our research. We would also like to thank the many colleagues, seminar participants and participants at the 2009 TIBER symposium who have offered us valuable advice and comments. Liutauras Petrucionis provided excellent research assistance.
Keywords:
Altruism, Charitable giving, Experimental methodology, House money effect, Individual choice, Public goods, Tangibility
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 480840
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480840
ISSN: 1386-4157
PURE UUID: efff0aaa-36ab-4aed-9437-26ea3dad2d1a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Aug 2023 16:37
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:10
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
David Reinstein
Author:
Gerhard Riener
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics