Content of Health Economics Analysis Plans (HEAPs) for trial-based economic evaluations: expert Delphi consensus survey
Content of Health Economics Analysis Plans (HEAPs) for trial-based economic evaluations: expert Delphi consensus survey
OBJECTIVES: Health economics analysis plans (HEAPs) currently lack consistency, with uncertainty surrounding appropriate content. We aimed to develop a list of essential items that should be included in HEAPs for economic evaluations conducted alongside randomized trials.
METHODS: A list of potential items for inclusion was developed by examining existing HEAPs. An electronic Delphi survey was conducted among professional health economists. Respondents were asked to rate potential items from 1 (least important) to 9 (most important), suggest additional items, and comment on proposed items (round 1). A second survey (round 2) was emailed to participants, including the participant's own scores from round 1 along with summary results from the whole panel; participants were asked to rerate each item. Consensus criteria for inclusion in the final list were predefined as >70% of participants rating an item 7-9 and <15% rating it 1-3 after round 2. A final item selection meeting was held to scrutinize the results and adjudicate on items lacking consensus.
RESULTS: 62 participants completed round 1 of the survey. The initial list included 72 potential items; all 72 were carried forward to round 2, and no new items were added. 48 round 1 respondents (77.4%) completed round 2 and reached consensus on 53 items. At the final meeting, the expert panel (n = 9) agreed that 58 items should be included in the essential list, moved 9 items to an optional list, and dropped 5 items.
CONCLUSIONS: Via expert consensus opinion, this study identified 58 items that are considered essential in a HEAP.
Consensus, Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods, Delphi Technique, Economics, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires
539-547
Thorn, Joanna C
e09abbe6-3317-4966-9d95-865b5c95d469
Davies, Charlotte F
cbd29336-8648-4ddc-a9d5-479d185ae26b
Brookes, Sara T
ffd7dc65-ac9a-456e-bc9c-dfee06239835
Noble, Sian M
d795f66c-53ef-4f4d-9d35-d4fe2a4484a0
Dritsaki, Melina
85694ebb-89c1-4c1e-8107-26c3d7b96e4b
Gray, Ewan
640f76cd-997b-4a8d-8690-081ffdcd7d01
Hughes, Dyfrig A
2f167dac-52de-4dd8-ad9e-24688b09f629
Mihaylova, Borislava
aacfabe0-8ad6-4134-b9ed-fa90ba2f7fda
Petrou, Stavros
5ee930f5-99db-4fb8-b401-95584cff0e20
Ridyard, Colin
d7f38103-02ec-4034-b331-dd57bd36147a
Sach, Tracey
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Wilson, Edward C F
aa0c5c9e-1464-4be2-850c-17a51cc4bcd9
Wordsworth, Sarah
d061a0ab-fad7-4842-96af-26e9efe20fb1
Hollingworth, William
404d4c1e-3911-4e9f-8be1-1436b4b98713
28 November 2020
Thorn, Joanna C
e09abbe6-3317-4966-9d95-865b5c95d469
Davies, Charlotte F
cbd29336-8648-4ddc-a9d5-479d185ae26b
Brookes, Sara T
ffd7dc65-ac9a-456e-bc9c-dfee06239835
Noble, Sian M
d795f66c-53ef-4f4d-9d35-d4fe2a4484a0
Dritsaki, Melina
85694ebb-89c1-4c1e-8107-26c3d7b96e4b
Gray, Ewan
640f76cd-997b-4a8d-8690-081ffdcd7d01
Hughes, Dyfrig A
2f167dac-52de-4dd8-ad9e-24688b09f629
Mihaylova, Borislava
aacfabe0-8ad6-4134-b9ed-fa90ba2f7fda
Petrou, Stavros
5ee930f5-99db-4fb8-b401-95584cff0e20
Ridyard, Colin
d7f38103-02ec-4034-b331-dd57bd36147a
Sach, Tracey
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Wilson, Edward C F
aa0c5c9e-1464-4be2-850c-17a51cc4bcd9
Wordsworth, Sarah
d061a0ab-fad7-4842-96af-26e9efe20fb1
Hollingworth, William
404d4c1e-3911-4e9f-8be1-1436b4b98713
Thorn, Joanna C, Davies, Charlotte F, Brookes, Sara T, Noble, Sian M, Dritsaki, Melina, Gray, Ewan, Hughes, Dyfrig A, Mihaylova, Borislava, Petrou, Stavros, Ridyard, Colin, Sach, Tracey, Wilson, Edward C F, Wordsworth, Sarah and Hollingworth, William
(2020)
Content of Health Economics Analysis Plans (HEAPs) for trial-based economic evaluations: expert Delphi consensus survey.
Value in Health, 24 (4), .
(doi:10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.002).
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Health economics analysis plans (HEAPs) currently lack consistency, with uncertainty surrounding appropriate content. We aimed to develop a list of essential items that should be included in HEAPs for economic evaluations conducted alongside randomized trials.
METHODS: A list of potential items for inclusion was developed by examining existing HEAPs. An electronic Delphi survey was conducted among professional health economists. Respondents were asked to rate potential items from 1 (least important) to 9 (most important), suggest additional items, and comment on proposed items (round 1). A second survey (round 2) was emailed to participants, including the participant's own scores from round 1 along with summary results from the whole panel; participants were asked to rerate each item. Consensus criteria for inclusion in the final list were predefined as >70% of participants rating an item 7-9 and <15% rating it 1-3 after round 2. A final item selection meeting was held to scrutinize the results and adjudicate on items lacking consensus.
RESULTS: 62 participants completed round 1 of the survey. The initial list included 72 potential items; all 72 were carried forward to round 2, and no new items were added. 48 round 1 respondents (77.4%) completed round 2 and reached consensus on 53 items. At the final meeting, the expert panel (n = 9) agreed that 58 items should be included in the essential list, moved 9 items to an optional list, and dropped 5 items.
CONCLUSIONS: Via expert consensus opinion, this study identified 58 items that are considered essential in a HEAP.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 28 November 2020
Additional Information:
Copyright © 2020 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Consensus, Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods, Delphi Technique, Economics, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 480855
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480855
ISSN: 1098-3015
PURE UUID: 970f8957-0a7b-4efe-81ef-baabf95e81a8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Aug 2023 16:39
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:20
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Joanna C Thorn
Author:
Charlotte F Davies
Author:
Sara T Brookes
Author:
Sian M Noble
Author:
Melina Dritsaki
Author:
Ewan Gray
Author:
Dyfrig A Hughes
Author:
Borislava Mihaylova
Author:
Stavros Petrou
Author:
Colin Ridyard
Author:
Tracey Sach
Author:
Edward C F Wilson
Author:
Sarah Wordsworth
Author:
William Hollingworth
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics