The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Economic evidence for nonpharmacological asthma management interventions: a systematic review

Economic evidence for nonpharmacological asthma management interventions: a systematic review
Economic evidence for nonpharmacological asthma management interventions: a systematic review

Asthma management, education and environmental interventions have been reported as cost-effective in a previous review (Pharm Pract (Granada), 2014;12:493), but methods used to estimate costs and outcomes were not discussed in detail. This review updates the previous review by providing economic evidence on the cost-effectiveness of studies identified after 2012, and a detailed assessment of the methods used in all identified studies. Twelve databases were searched from 1990 to January 2016, and studies included economic evaluations, asthma subjects and nonpharmacological interventions written in English. Sixty-four studies were included. Of these, 15 were found in addition to the earlier review; 53% were rated fair in quality and 47% high. Education and self-management interventions were the most cost-effective, in line with the earlier review. Self-reporting was the most common method used to gather resource-use data, accompanied by bottom-up approaches to estimate costs. Main outcome measures were asthma-related hospitalizations (69%), quality of life (41%) and utility (38%), with AQLQ and the EQ-5D being the most common questionnaires measured prospectively at fixed time points. More rigorous costing methods are needed with a more common quality of life tool to aid greater replicability and comparability amongst asthma studies.

Asthma/epidemiology, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Disease Management, Health Care Costs, Hospitalization, Humans, Public Health Surveillance, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires
0105-4538
1182-1195
Crossman-Barnes, C-J
1f73b284-25b3-4be2-b55b-99d9b44add39
Peel, A
b639cf47-4069-4ad6-922a-4117cd3f30d0
Fong-Soe-Khioe, R
9d6f88d4-407f-41e9-81d5-17b3355cc25d
Sach, T.
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Wilson, A
91a85e27-8876-498a-a543-114d6e993d94
Barton, G
d46579ef-f0f4-4650-badc-8f9fd10eeb01
Crossman-Barnes, C-J
1f73b284-25b3-4be2-b55b-99d9b44add39
Peel, A
b639cf47-4069-4ad6-922a-4117cd3f30d0
Fong-Soe-Khioe, R
9d6f88d4-407f-41e9-81d5-17b3355cc25d
Sach, T.
5c09256f-ebed-4d14-853a-181f6c92d6f2
Wilson, A
91a85e27-8876-498a-a543-114d6e993d94
Barton, G
d46579ef-f0f4-4650-badc-8f9fd10eeb01

Crossman-Barnes, C-J, Peel, A, Fong-Soe-Khioe, R, Sach, T., Wilson, A and Barton, G (2017) Economic evidence for nonpharmacological asthma management interventions: a systematic review. Allergy, 73 (6), 1182-1195. (doi:10.1111/all.13337).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Asthma management, education and environmental interventions have been reported as cost-effective in a previous review (Pharm Pract (Granada), 2014;12:493), but methods used to estimate costs and outcomes were not discussed in detail. This review updates the previous review by providing economic evidence on the cost-effectiveness of studies identified after 2012, and a detailed assessment of the methods used in all identified studies. Twelve databases were searched from 1990 to January 2016, and studies included economic evaluations, asthma subjects and nonpharmacological interventions written in English. Sixty-four studies were included. Of these, 15 were found in addition to the earlier review; 53% were rated fair in quality and 47% high. Education and self-management interventions were the most cost-effective, in line with the earlier review. Self-reporting was the most common method used to gather resource-use data, accompanied by bottom-up approaches to estimate costs. Main outcome measures were asthma-related hospitalizations (69%), quality of life (41%) and utility (38%), with AQLQ and the EQ-5D being the most common questionnaires measured prospectively at fixed time points. More rigorous costing methods are needed with a more common quality of life tool to aid greater replicability and comparability amongst asthma studies.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 6 November 2017
Additional Information: © 2017 The Authors. Allergy Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords: Asthma/epidemiology, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Disease Management, Health Care Costs, Hospitalization, Humans, Public Health Surveillance, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 480868
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480868
ISSN: 0105-4538
PURE UUID: 6b109f67-6130-468d-b300-2485636f4a31
ORCID for T. Sach: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-9220

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Aug 2023 16:40
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:20

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: C-J Crossman-Barnes
Author: A Peel
Author: R Fong-Soe-Khioe
Author: T. Sach ORCID iD
Author: A Wilson
Author: G Barton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×