The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A case of mistaken identity? Debating the dilemmas of street-level bureaucracy with Musil et al

A case of mistaken identity? Debating the dilemmas of street-level bureaucracy with Musil et al
A case of mistaken identity? Debating the dilemmas of street-level bureaucracy with Musil et al
Lipsky's Street-level Bureaucracy (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1980) has exerted a strong influence on the study of public service organisations. There has been a growing interest in using this perspective to understand the organisational context of social work and Musil et al.'s article in the EJSW (2004, 'Do social workers avoid the dilemmas of work with clients?', European Journal of Social Work, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 305-319) reflects this interest. Musil et al. argue that it is possible to identify two forms of practitioner response to the constraints of street-level bureaucracies: adapting working practices in ways that disadvantage service users or challenging working conditions in order to achieve more professionally acceptable practice. Their contribution to the debate is helpful, particularly with regard to their identification of responses by practitioners that seek to advance the interests of service users. However, we view their approach as constrained by lack of consideration of the construction of social work roles within particular street-level bureaucracies. We suggest that Lipsky's work should be approached as a tentative analytic framework, rather than as a fixed model and we argue that a productive approach to research on social workers as street-level bureaucrats is conjunctural analysis. Such analysis examines the contexts, circumstances and statuses of practitioners and how these factors shape the specific forms of street-level practice that operate in particular organisational settings. We illustrate this in our discussion of the factors that are likely to have had a bearing on the two practice settings used as case studies by Musil et al.
street-level bureaucracy, social workers, social work organisations
1369-1457
445-459
Evans, Tony
2dc99480-b1d1-4a24-b9c8-8521299b4f16
Harris, John
e59b2557-eac7-42c0-b511-0e3e0e02e556
Evans, Tony
2dc99480-b1d1-4a24-b9c8-8521299b4f16
Harris, John
e59b2557-eac7-42c0-b511-0e3e0e02e556

Evans, Tony and Harris, John (2006) A case of mistaken identity? Debating the dilemmas of street-level bureaucracy with Musil et al. European Journal of Social Work, 9 (4), 445-459. (doi:10.1080/13691450600958494).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Lipsky's Street-level Bureaucracy (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1980) has exerted a strong influence on the study of public service organisations. There has been a growing interest in using this perspective to understand the organisational context of social work and Musil et al.'s article in the EJSW (2004, 'Do social workers avoid the dilemmas of work with clients?', European Journal of Social Work, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 305-319) reflects this interest. Musil et al. argue that it is possible to identify two forms of practitioner response to the constraints of street-level bureaucracies: adapting working practices in ways that disadvantage service users or challenging working conditions in order to achieve more professionally acceptable practice. Their contribution to the debate is helpful, particularly with regard to their identification of responses by practitioners that seek to advance the interests of service users. However, we view their approach as constrained by lack of consideration of the construction of social work roles within particular street-level bureaucracies. We suggest that Lipsky's work should be approached as a tentative analytic framework, rather than as a fixed model and we argue that a productive approach to research on social workers as street-level bureaucrats is conjunctural analysis. Such analysis examines the contexts, circumstances and statuses of practitioners and how these factors shape the specific forms of street-level practice that operate in particular organisational settings. We illustrate this in our discussion of the factors that are likely to have had a bearing on the two practice settings used as case studies by Musil et al.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: December 2006
Keywords: street-level bureaucracy, social workers, social work organisations

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 48087
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/48087
ISSN: 1369-1457
PURE UUID: 7b9f4ca0-7437-4eba-a7cc-4e6c457083c1

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Aug 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 09:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Tony Evans
Author: John Harris

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×