Confidentiality in mental health services: a negotiated order?
Confidentiality in mental health services: a negotiated order?
The negotiated order perspective developed from the study of informal practices in mental health hospitals. It has subsequently become an influential perspective in the study of organizations. This article looks at its continuing relevance to understanding the way in which mental health services operate. Since the original study was published, mental health care has been transformed, with a move in the Western world to deinstitutionalized care and an increasingly managerial approach within human services organizations. The research reported here looks at confidentiality within mental health services in Britain in order to explore the continuing relevance and limitations of the negotiated order perspective. The study examines the confidentiality practices of mental health professionals from the point of view of service users. Seventeen service users were interviewed to ascertain their experience of confidentiality practices in their encounters with health and social services, and to identify their evaluation and response to these encounters. The study suggests the continuing relevance of the negotiated order perspective in terms of understanding professional practices, but also underlines the need to understand negotiation as an active set of practices involving service users as well as professionals.
confidentiality, discretion, managerialism, mental health, negotiated order, professionals, service users
213-229
Evans, Tony
2dc99480-b1d1-4a24-b9c8-8521299b4f16
June 2007
Evans, Tony
2dc99480-b1d1-4a24-b9c8-8521299b4f16
Evans, Tony
(2007)
Confidentiality in mental health services: a negotiated order?
Qualitative Social Work, 6 (2), .
(doi:10.1177/1473325007077254).
Abstract
The negotiated order perspective developed from the study of informal practices in mental health hospitals. It has subsequently become an influential perspective in the study of organizations. This article looks at its continuing relevance to understanding the way in which mental health services operate. Since the original study was published, mental health care has been transformed, with a move in the Western world to deinstitutionalized care and an increasingly managerial approach within human services organizations. The research reported here looks at confidentiality within mental health services in Britain in order to explore the continuing relevance and limitations of the negotiated order perspective. The study examines the confidentiality practices of mental health professionals from the point of view of service users. Seventeen service users were interviewed to ascertain their experience of confidentiality practices in their encounters with health and social services, and to identify their evaluation and response to these encounters. The study suggests the continuing relevance of the negotiated order perspective in terms of understanding professional practices, but also underlines the need to understand negotiation as an active set of practices involving service users as well as professionals.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: June 2007
Keywords:
confidentiality, discretion, managerialism, mental health, negotiated order, professionals, service users
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 48088
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/48088
ISSN: 1473-3250
PURE UUID: 363749f0-f39b-4c97-bd62-cdb2cd5eaceb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Aug 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 09:42
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Tony Evans
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics