The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparative study of hybrid multi-timescale and G-scheme methods for computational efficiency with detailed chemical kinetics

Comparative study of hybrid multi-timescale and G-scheme methods for computational efficiency with detailed chemical kinetics
Comparative study of hybrid multi-timescale and G-scheme methods for computational efficiency with detailed chemical kinetics

To develop a multiscale adaptive reduced chemistry solver (MARCS) for computationally efficient modeling of a reactive flow, the Hybrid Multi-Timescale (HMTS) method and G-Scheme have been evaluated and compared for both homogeneous auto-ignition and 1-D premixed spherical propagating flame calculations with detailed chemical kinetics of hydrogen, methane, dimethyl ether, and n-heptane. It is demonstrated that the CPU time of HMTS and G-Scheme methods depends on the number of species of the kinetic mechanisms, respectively, linearly and to the third power. For ignition, the results show that the G-Scheme method is faster than HMTS method when the species number of the chemical mechanism is below 40. The CPU Time of G-Scheme increases dramatically when the number of species of the detailed mechanisms is increased due to the huge computation cost of matrix inversion and reaction mode decomposition. Specifically, the G-Scheme method is faster at the induction stage of ignition and the near-equilibrium condition after ignition due to the large integration time step determined by the method adaptively. The HMTS method is faster at near the ignition point and for a large kinetic mechanism due to the fast convergence at a small base time step. Therefore, the present results suggest that it is possible an MARCS for computationally efficient modeling of combustion by adaptively taking the advantages of the computation efficiency of the HMTS method and the G-Scheme in different local combustion regimes and reduced mechanism sizes and integrating with the co-related dynamic adaptive chemistry and transport method (CO-DACT).

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Sun, Weiqi
6eb672f0-726a-4dde-9d04-a6db31774c74
Grenga, Temistocle
be0eba30-74b5-4134-87e7-3a2d6dd3836f
Ju, Yiguang
9fe7f327-5d4e-459a-b024-67ddbd57d9c1
Sun, Weiqi
6eb672f0-726a-4dde-9d04-a6db31774c74
Grenga, Temistocle
be0eba30-74b5-4134-87e7-3a2d6dd3836f
Ju, Yiguang
9fe7f327-5d4e-459a-b024-67ddbd57d9c1

Sun, Weiqi, Grenga, Temistocle and Ju, Yiguang (2017) Comparative study of hybrid multi-timescale and G-scheme methods for computational efficiency with detailed chemical kinetics. In AIAA SciTech Forum - 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.. (doi:10.2514/6.2017-0602).

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

To develop a multiscale adaptive reduced chemistry solver (MARCS) for computationally efficient modeling of a reactive flow, the Hybrid Multi-Timescale (HMTS) method and G-Scheme have been evaluated and compared for both homogeneous auto-ignition and 1-D premixed spherical propagating flame calculations with detailed chemical kinetics of hydrogen, methane, dimethyl ether, and n-heptane. It is demonstrated that the CPU time of HMTS and G-Scheme methods depends on the number of species of the kinetic mechanisms, respectively, linearly and to the third power. For ignition, the results show that the G-Scheme method is faster than HMTS method when the species number of the chemical mechanism is below 40. The CPU Time of G-Scheme increases dramatically when the number of species of the detailed mechanisms is increased due to the huge computation cost of matrix inversion and reaction mode decomposition. Specifically, the G-Scheme method is faster at the induction stage of ignition and the near-equilibrium condition after ignition due to the large integration time step determined by the method adaptively. The HMTS method is faster at near the ignition point and for a large kinetic mechanism due to the fast convergence at a small base time step. Therefore, the present results suggest that it is possible an MARCS for computationally efficient modeling of combustion by adaptively taking the advantages of the computation efficiency of the HMTS method and the G-Scheme in different local combustion regimes and reduced mechanism sizes and integrating with the co-related dynamic adaptive chemistry and transport method (CO-DACT).

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2017
Additional Information: Funding Information: The authors would like to thank the grant support from the Army Research Office with grant number W911NF-16-1-0076. Publisher Copyright: © 2017 by Weiqi Sun.
Venue - Dates: 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, , Grapevine, United States, 2017-01-09 - 2017-01-13

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 480916
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480916
PURE UUID: ccde53bd-5bb7-45be-a046-29ed34dc8954
ORCID for Temistocle Grenga: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9465-9505

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Aug 2023 16:56
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Weiqi Sun
Author: Temistocle Grenga ORCID iD
Author: Yiguang Ju

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×