Which way now? Applications of malleable attentional resources theory
Which way now? Applications of malleable attentional resources theory
Previous conference papers in this series by the current authors (Young & Stanton, 1997; 1998; 1999) have reviewed literature on attention and mental workload, to synthesise a theory which could explain why extremely low task demands can be detrimental to performance. Studies of automated systems provided an ideal domain within which to explore the theories, as there had been many previous examples comparing the performance of active controllers against passive monitors. The literature review extracted mental underload as a specific problem for task performance, as many researchers had commented on the possible detrimental effects of excessively low mental demands. Whilst there was plenty of concern for the effects of underload, only a few (e.g., Desmond et al., 1998) had offered explanations as to why low demands had an adverse effect on performance.
245-250
Young, Mark
3f79589e-2000-4cb0-832a-6eba54f50130
Stanton, Neville
351a44ab-09a0-422a-a738-01df1fe0fadd
10 April 2001
Young, Mark
3f79589e-2000-4cb0-832a-6eba54f50130
Stanton, Neville
351a44ab-09a0-422a-a738-01df1fe0fadd
Young, Mark and Stanton, Neville
(2001)
Which way now? Applications of malleable attentional resources theory.
Hanson, M.A.
(ed.)
In Contemporary Ergonomics 2001: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society.
Routledge.
.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
Previous conference papers in this series by the current authors (Young & Stanton, 1997; 1998; 1999) have reviewed literature on attention and mental workload, to synthesise a theory which could explain why extremely low task demands can be detrimental to performance. Studies of automated systems provided an ideal domain within which to explore the theories, as there had been many previous examples comparing the performance of active controllers against passive monitors. The literature review extracted mental underload as a specific problem for task performance, as many researchers had commented on the possible detrimental effects of excessively low mental demands. Whilst there was plenty of concern for the effects of underload, only a few (e.g., Desmond et al., 1998) had offered explanations as to why low demands had an adverse effect on performance.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 10 April 2001
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 481120
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/481120
PURE UUID: b544ea0b-d1d0-4644-848b-227bd719caf7
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Aug 2023 16:32
Last modified: 10 Jan 2025 03:16
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Mark Young
Editor:
M.A. Hanson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics