The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Which way now? Applications of malleable attentional resources theory

Which way now? Applications of malleable attentional resources theory
Which way now? Applications of malleable attentional resources theory
Previous conference papers in this series by the current authors (Young & Stanton, 1997; 1998; 1999) have reviewed literature on attention and mental workload, to synthesise a theory which could explain why extremely low task demands can be detrimental to performance. Studies of automated systems provided an ideal domain within which to explore the theories, as there had been many previous examples comparing the performance of active controllers against passive monitors. The literature review extracted mental underload as a specific problem for task performance, as many researchers had commented on the possible detrimental effects of excessively low mental demands. Whilst there was plenty of concern for the effects of underload, only a few (e.g., Desmond et al., 1998) had offered explanations as to why low demands had an adverse effect on performance.
245-250
Routledge
Young, Mark
3f79589e-2000-4cb0-832a-6eba54f50130
Stanton, Neville
351a44ab-09a0-422a-a738-01df1fe0fadd
Hanson, M.A.
Young, Mark
3f79589e-2000-4cb0-832a-6eba54f50130
Stanton, Neville
351a44ab-09a0-422a-a738-01df1fe0fadd
Hanson, M.A.

Young, Mark and Stanton, Neville (2001) Which way now? Applications of malleable attentional resources theory. Hanson, M.A. (ed.) In Contemporary Ergonomics 2001: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society. Routledge. pp. 245-250 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Previous conference papers in this series by the current authors (Young & Stanton, 1997; 1998; 1999) have reviewed literature on attention and mental workload, to synthesise a theory which could explain why extremely low task demands can be detrimental to performance. Studies of automated systems provided an ideal domain within which to explore the theories, as there had been many previous examples comparing the performance of active controllers against passive monitors. The literature review extracted mental underload as a specific problem for task performance, as many researchers had commented on the possible detrimental effects of excessively low mental demands. Whilst there was plenty of concern for the effects of underload, only a few (e.g., Desmond et al., 1998) had offered explanations as to why low demands had an adverse effect on performance.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 10 April 2001

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 481120
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/481120
PURE UUID: b544ea0b-d1d0-4644-848b-227bd719caf7
ORCID for Mark Young: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0001-2594-453X
ORCID for Neville Stanton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8562-3279

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Aug 2023 16:32
Last modified: 09 Dec 2023 03:06

Export record

Contributors

Author: Mark Young ORCID iD
Author: Neville Stanton ORCID iD
Editor: M.A. Hanson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×