The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The role of the human in future systems – considerations and concerns

The role of the human in future systems – considerations and concerns
The role of the human in future systems – considerations and concerns
Technological progress is an inexorable tide – the rise of ubiquitous computing purports to make our lives safer and more efficient. From automatic protection systems in aircraft to artificial intelligence in our washing machines, the aims of such developments are very much in line with those of ergonomics – to improve safety, efficiency, and satisfaction. Nevertheless, the ergonomics literature on automation holds a much more conservative view, and we have known for some time now that to simply try to automate the human out of the loop does not provide the solutions that engineers crave. In the best-selling book ‘Jurassic Park’ (Crichton, 1980), the mathematician character Ian Malcolm criticises scientists for focusing too much on whether they can do something without stopping to consider whether they should. The same criticism has been levelled at designers of automation by some of the most influential ergonomists working in this field (e.g., Parasuraman, 1987; Wiener and Curry, 1980). Whilst the principle of avoiding technology merely for its own sake remains valid, it is fair to say that the current view in ergonomics is somewhat more mature in trying to understand how humans and automation can work together safely and effectively. It would be foolish to think we could stem technological progress – nor would we want to, lest Ian Malcolm accuse us of the kind of narrow-minded thinking he refers to as ‘thintelligence’. Humans and technology can and indeed should work together, and technological progress should be exploited – but in the right way. This paper considers the future for the ‘ghost in the machine’, arguing for a philosophical approach to the design of automated systems which allows humans and technology to coexist in a truly dualist system.
199-207
Routledge
Young, Mark
3f79589e-2000-4cb0-832a-6eba54f50130
Bust, Philip D.
Young, Mark
3f79589e-2000-4cb0-832a-6eba54f50130
Bust, Philip D.

Young, Mark (2009) The role of the human in future systems – considerations and concerns. Bust, Philip D. (ed.) In Contemporary Ergonomics 2009: Proceedings of the International Conference on Contemporary Ergonomics 2009. Routledge. pp. 199-207 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Technological progress is an inexorable tide – the rise of ubiquitous computing purports to make our lives safer and more efficient. From automatic protection systems in aircraft to artificial intelligence in our washing machines, the aims of such developments are very much in line with those of ergonomics – to improve safety, efficiency, and satisfaction. Nevertheless, the ergonomics literature on automation holds a much more conservative view, and we have known for some time now that to simply try to automate the human out of the loop does not provide the solutions that engineers crave. In the best-selling book ‘Jurassic Park’ (Crichton, 1980), the mathematician character Ian Malcolm criticises scientists for focusing too much on whether they can do something without stopping to consider whether they should. The same criticism has been levelled at designers of automation by some of the most influential ergonomists working in this field (e.g., Parasuraman, 1987; Wiener and Curry, 1980). Whilst the principle of avoiding technology merely for its own sake remains valid, it is fair to say that the current view in ergonomics is somewhat more mature in trying to understand how humans and automation can work together safely and effectively. It would be foolish to think we could stem technological progress – nor would we want to, lest Ian Malcolm accuse us of the kind of narrow-minded thinking he refers to as ‘thintelligence’. Humans and technology can and indeed should work together, and technological progress should be exploited – but in the right way. This paper considers the future for the ‘ghost in the machine’, arguing for a philosophical approach to the design of automated systems which allows humans and technology to coexist in a truly dualist system.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 January 2009

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 481145
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/481145
PURE UUID: 75305069-850c-44a0-af9a-fd2ece3d5e05
ORCID for Mark Young: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0001-2594-453X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Aug 2023 16:45
Last modified: 09 Dec 2023 03:06

Export record

Contributors

Author: Mark Young ORCID iD
Editor: Philip D. Bust

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×