The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Impact of family networks on uptake of health interventions: evidence from a community-randomized control trial aimed at increasing HIV testing in South Africa

Impact of family networks on uptake of health interventions: evidence from a community-randomized control trial aimed at increasing HIV testing in South Africa
Impact of family networks on uptake of health interventions: evidence from a community-randomized control trial aimed at increasing HIV testing in South Africa
Introduction
While it is widely acknowledged that family relationships can influence health outcomes, their impact on the uptake of individual health interventions is unclear. In this study, we quantified how the efficacy of a randomized health intervention is shaped by its pattern of distribution in the family network.

Methods
The “Home-Based Intervention to Test and Start” (HITS) was a 2×2 factorial community-randomized controlled trial in Umkhanyakude, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, embedded in the Africa Health Research Institute's population-based demographic and HIV surveillance platform (ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT03757104).

The study investigated the impact of two interventions: a financial micro-incentive and a male-targeted HIV-specific decision support programme. The surveillance area was divided into 45 community clusters. Individuals aged ≥15 years in 16 randomly selected communities were offered a micro-incentive (R50 [$3] food voucher) for rapid HIV testing (intervention arm). Those living in the remaining 29 communities were offered testing only (control arm). Study data were collected between February and November 2018.

Using routinely collected data on parents, conjugal partners, and co-residents, a socio-centric family network was constructed among HITS-eligible individuals. Nodes in this network represent individuals and ties represent family relationships. We estimated the effect of offering the incentive to people with and without family members who also received the offer on the uptake of HIV testing. We fitted a linear probability model with robust standard errors, accounting for clustering at the community level.

Results
Overall, 15,675 people participated in the HITS trial. Among those with no family members who received the offer, the incentive's efficacy was a 6.5 percentage point increase (95% CI: 5.3−7.7). The efficacy was higher among those with at least one family member who received the offer (21.1 percentage point increase (95% CI: 19.9−22.3). The difference in efficacy was statistically significant (21.1–6.5 = 14.6%; 95% CI: 9.3−19.9).

Conclusions
Micro-incentives appear to have synergistic effects when distributed within family networks. These effects support family network-based approaches for the design of health interventions.
AHRI, HIV epidemiology, randomized controlled trial (RCT), social epidemiology, social networks, testing
1758-2652
Makofane, Keletso
251c0a6d-8c31-4b03-a723-1c9f6a4ba901
Kim, Hae-Young
b60ab067-300c-45b1-a317-9921b5b62fd2
Tchetgen Tchetgen, Eric
3199075a-1ede-45de-8144-7b0fb22c58a4
Bassett, Mary
68ce285a-28e6-4530-8fa2-8168fb52a4e3
Berkman, Lisa
c12d8640-65d2-4016-8dbe-2c486eae8768
Adeagbo, Olawufemi
03b88b2a-690d-4680-bf3e-946457086674
Mcgrath, Nuala
b75c0232-24ec-443f-93a9-69e9e12dc961
Seeley, Janet
d5de9ac7-b54d-4ea5-9098-0c4456974424
Shahmanesh, Maryam
d88581c9-0ef2-4506-b8d3-d72682936a09
Yapa, H.M.
b8b30d61-3eb3-4668-8460-fcdd8b3b99b1
Herbst, Kobus
fab67269-11ef-4c52-91bc-635b00065504
Tanser, Frank
a7112c48-809b-4f7c-8662-eaef445891f4
Barnighausen, Till Winfried
f99001d2-60f1-4447-b554-b01dca4b4c5e
Makofane, Keletso
251c0a6d-8c31-4b03-a723-1c9f6a4ba901
Kim, Hae-Young
b60ab067-300c-45b1-a317-9921b5b62fd2
Tchetgen Tchetgen, Eric
3199075a-1ede-45de-8144-7b0fb22c58a4
Bassett, Mary
68ce285a-28e6-4530-8fa2-8168fb52a4e3
Berkman, Lisa
c12d8640-65d2-4016-8dbe-2c486eae8768
Adeagbo, Olawufemi
03b88b2a-690d-4680-bf3e-946457086674
Mcgrath, Nuala
b75c0232-24ec-443f-93a9-69e9e12dc961
Seeley, Janet
d5de9ac7-b54d-4ea5-9098-0c4456974424
Shahmanesh, Maryam
d88581c9-0ef2-4506-b8d3-d72682936a09
Yapa, H.M.
b8b30d61-3eb3-4668-8460-fcdd8b3b99b1
Herbst, Kobus
fab67269-11ef-4c52-91bc-635b00065504
Tanser, Frank
a7112c48-809b-4f7c-8662-eaef445891f4
Barnighausen, Till Winfried
f99001d2-60f1-4447-b554-b01dca4b4c5e

Makofane, Keletso, Kim, Hae-Young, Tchetgen Tchetgen, Eric, Bassett, Mary, Berkman, Lisa, Adeagbo, Olawufemi, Mcgrath, Nuala, Seeley, Janet, Shahmanesh, Maryam, Yapa, H.M., Herbst, Kobus, Tanser, Frank and Barnighausen, Till Winfried (2023) Impact of family networks on uptake of health interventions: evidence from a community-randomized control trial aimed at increasing HIV testing in South Africa. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 26 (8), [e26142]. (doi:10.1002/jia2.26142).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction
While it is widely acknowledged that family relationships can influence health outcomes, their impact on the uptake of individual health interventions is unclear. In this study, we quantified how the efficacy of a randomized health intervention is shaped by its pattern of distribution in the family network.

Methods
The “Home-Based Intervention to Test and Start” (HITS) was a 2×2 factorial community-randomized controlled trial in Umkhanyakude, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, embedded in the Africa Health Research Institute's population-based demographic and HIV surveillance platform (ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT03757104).

The study investigated the impact of two interventions: a financial micro-incentive and a male-targeted HIV-specific decision support programme. The surveillance area was divided into 45 community clusters. Individuals aged ≥15 years in 16 randomly selected communities were offered a micro-incentive (R50 [$3] food voucher) for rapid HIV testing (intervention arm). Those living in the remaining 29 communities were offered testing only (control arm). Study data were collected between February and November 2018.

Using routinely collected data on parents, conjugal partners, and co-residents, a socio-centric family network was constructed among HITS-eligible individuals. Nodes in this network represent individuals and ties represent family relationships. We estimated the effect of offering the incentive to people with and without family members who also received the offer on the uptake of HIV testing. We fitted a linear probability model with robust standard errors, accounting for clustering at the community level.

Results
Overall, 15,675 people participated in the HITS trial. Among those with no family members who received the offer, the incentive's efficacy was a 6.5 percentage point increase (95% CI: 5.3−7.7). The efficacy was higher among those with at least one family member who received the offer (21.1 percentage point increase (95% CI: 19.9−22.3). The difference in efficacy was statistically significant (21.1–6.5 = 14.6%; 95% CI: 9.3−19.9).

Conclusions
Micro-incentives appear to have synergistic effects when distributed within family networks. These effects support family network-based approaches for the design of health interventions.

Text
JIAS-2022-09-0491.R1_Proof_hi - Accepted Manuscript
Download (956kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 June 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 August 2023
Published date: August 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: Our sincere thanks to the Africa Health Research Institute's population-based demographic and HIV surveillance platform. We are grateful, also, to peer reviewers and editors whose thoughtful criticism led to improvements in the manuscript. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society.
Keywords: AHRI, HIV epidemiology, randomized controlled trial (RCT), social epidemiology, social networks, testing

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 481150
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/481150
ISSN: 1758-2652
PURE UUID: ba8d9346-b187-443c-baa0-3b3b7d25e1c8
ORCID for Nuala Mcgrath: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1039-0159

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Aug 2023 16:48
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:25

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Keletso Makofane
Author: Hae-Young Kim
Author: Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen
Author: Mary Bassett
Author: Lisa Berkman
Author: Olawufemi Adeagbo
Author: Nuala Mcgrath ORCID iD
Author: Janet Seeley
Author: Maryam Shahmanesh
Author: H.M. Yapa
Author: Kobus Herbst
Author: Frank Tanser
Author: Till Winfried Barnighausen

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×