COVID-19 Oximetry @home: evaluation of patient outcomes
COVID-19 Oximetry @home: evaluation of patient outcomes
Background: COVID-19 has placed unprecedented demands on hospitals. A clinical service, COVID-19 Oximetry @home (CO@h) was launched in November 2020 to support remote monitoring of COVID-19 patients in the community. Remote monitoring through CO@h aims to identify early patient deterioration and provide timely escalation for cases of silent hypoxia, while reducing the burden on secondary care.
Methods: we conducted a retrospective service evaluation of COVID-19 patients onboarded to CO@h from November 2020 to March 2021 in the North Hampshire (UK) community led service (a collaboration of 15 General Practitioner (GP) practices covering 230 000 people). We have compared outcomes for patients admitted to Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital who were CO@h patients (COVID-19 patients with home monitoring of oxygen saturation (SpO2; n=115), with non-CO@h patients (those directly admitted without being monitored by CO@h (n=633)). Crude and adjusted OR analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of CO@h on patient outcomes of 30-day mortality, Intensive care unit (ICU) admission and hospital length of stay greater than 3, 7, 14 and 28 days.
Results: adjusted ORs for CO@h show an association with a reduction for several adverse patient outcome: 30-day hospital mortality (p<0.001, OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.47), hospital length of stay larger than 3 days (p<0.05, OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.00), 7 days (p<0.001, OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.54), 14 days (p<0.001, OR 0.22 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.41), and 28 days (p<0.05, OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.59). No significant reduction ICU admission was observed (p>0.05, OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.04). Within 30 days of hospital admission, there were no hospital readmissions for those on the CO@h service as opposed to 8.7% readmissions for those not on the service.
Conclusions: we have demonstrated a significant association between CO@h and better patient outcomes; most notably a reduction in the odds of hospital lengths of stays longer than 7, 14 and 28 days and 30-day hospital mortality.
Boniface, Michael
f30bfd7d-20ed-451b-b405-34e3e22fdfba
Burns, Daniel
40b9dc88-a54a-4365-b747-4456d9203146
Duckworth, Christopher
992c216c-8f66-48a8-8de6-2f04b4f736e6
Ahmed, Mazen
57d2689b-7420-4be5-974d-25d048c018dd
Duruiheoma, Franklin
bd050a22-85bc-49ae-8d39-b97e0f08453b
Armitage, Htwe
f20a9e2d-1b62-4f17-8e9c-bfd6a0e0589f
Ratcliffe, Naomi
f10be2f5-bcd9-49ab-9967-ae421f977b7d
Duffy, John
c0e4f8e0-72e4-4aa8-83d2-74cec233179c
O’Keeffe, Caroline
879cfd52-02e7-406e-b974-ca9bd5de07f2
Inada-Kim, Matt
eaac8cc7-16ef-4a25-a59f-335837a9f2c7
28 March 2022
Boniface, Michael
f30bfd7d-20ed-451b-b405-34e3e22fdfba
Burns, Daniel
40b9dc88-a54a-4365-b747-4456d9203146
Duckworth, Christopher
992c216c-8f66-48a8-8de6-2f04b4f736e6
Ahmed, Mazen
57d2689b-7420-4be5-974d-25d048c018dd
Duruiheoma, Franklin
bd050a22-85bc-49ae-8d39-b97e0f08453b
Armitage, Htwe
f20a9e2d-1b62-4f17-8e9c-bfd6a0e0589f
Ratcliffe, Naomi
f10be2f5-bcd9-49ab-9967-ae421f977b7d
Duffy, John
c0e4f8e0-72e4-4aa8-83d2-74cec233179c
O’Keeffe, Caroline
879cfd52-02e7-406e-b974-ca9bd5de07f2
Inada-Kim, Matt
eaac8cc7-16ef-4a25-a59f-335837a9f2c7
Boniface, Michael, Burns, Daniel, Duckworth, Christopher, Ahmed, Mazen, Duruiheoma, Franklin, Armitage, Htwe, Ratcliffe, Naomi, Duffy, John, O’Keeffe, Caroline and Inada-Kim, Matt
(2022)
COVID-19 Oximetry @home: evaluation of patient outcomes.
BMJ Open Quality, 11, [001584].
(doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001584).
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 has placed unprecedented demands on hospitals. A clinical service, COVID-19 Oximetry @home (CO@h) was launched in November 2020 to support remote monitoring of COVID-19 patients in the community. Remote monitoring through CO@h aims to identify early patient deterioration and provide timely escalation for cases of silent hypoxia, while reducing the burden on secondary care.
Methods: we conducted a retrospective service evaluation of COVID-19 patients onboarded to CO@h from November 2020 to March 2021 in the North Hampshire (UK) community led service (a collaboration of 15 General Practitioner (GP) practices covering 230 000 people). We have compared outcomes for patients admitted to Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital who were CO@h patients (COVID-19 patients with home monitoring of oxygen saturation (SpO2; n=115), with non-CO@h patients (those directly admitted without being monitored by CO@h (n=633)). Crude and adjusted OR analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of CO@h on patient outcomes of 30-day mortality, Intensive care unit (ICU) admission and hospital length of stay greater than 3, 7, 14 and 28 days.
Results: adjusted ORs for CO@h show an association with a reduction for several adverse patient outcome: 30-day hospital mortality (p<0.001, OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.47), hospital length of stay larger than 3 days (p<0.05, OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.00), 7 days (p<0.001, OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.54), 14 days (p<0.001, OR 0.22 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.41), and 28 days (p<0.05, OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.59). No significant reduction ICU admission was observed (p>0.05, OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.04). Within 30 days of hospital admission, there were no hospital readmissions for those on the CO@h service as opposed to 8.7% readmissions for those not on the service.
Conclusions: we have demonstrated a significant association between CO@h and better patient outcomes; most notably a reduction in the odds of hospital lengths of stays longer than 7, 14 and 28 days and 30-day hospital mortality.
Text
e001584.full
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 10 February 2022
Published date: 28 March 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 481230
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/481230
PURE UUID: b31ab4ad-9f09-42c8-b93f-439c43fdcf86
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Aug 2023 16:32
Last modified: 15 Jun 2024 02:01
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Daniel Burns
Author:
Christopher Duckworth
Author:
Mazen Ahmed
Author:
Franklin Duruiheoma
Author:
Htwe Armitage
Author:
Naomi Ratcliffe
Author:
John Duffy
Author:
Caroline O’Keeffe
Author:
Matt Inada-Kim
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics