The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Using labor process theory to probe the “sharing” economy

Using labor process theory to probe the “sharing” economy
Using labor process theory to probe the “sharing” economy
The “sharing” economy bears this shorthand name to represent new ways in which providers of services and those seeking services can connect through technological applications. In our paper, we foreground labor to understand how work is allocated, performed, monitored, and remunerated in the “sharing” economy. To capture more than metaphors like “sharing” can convey, we argue that an analytical framework is needed to characterize more carefully the exchanges between capital and labor. We propose that labor process theory, though formed in the era of manufacturing work, offers a useful analytical framework, anchored in the concepts of “obscuring and securing” how owners/managers derive profit from the value created by labor. Labor process theory offers a broad systemic perspective. While it is an analytical not a normative framework, it can provide a foundation for normative analysis of what we position as “distributing” the gains produced by workers, where distributing is the more apt concern than sharing. We derive three elements of a labor process toolkit – technological control, invisibility of owners/managers, and possessive individualism – and apply them to Uber as our case. We draw contrasts but also surprising similarities to “old” ways of working and also uncover how conflicts of interest between capital and labor portend ongoing instabilities.
0065-0668
Chai, Sunyu
0fdd17d0-d13d-48b0-9c28-209e393f6bc6
Scully, Maureen
9c2023cd-41db-459c-a178-3f87caac903f
Chai, Sunyu
0fdd17d0-d13d-48b0-9c28-209e393f6bc6
Scully, Maureen
9c2023cd-41db-459c-a178-3f87caac903f

Chai, Sunyu and Scully, Maureen (2018) Using labor process theory to probe the “sharing” economy. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018 (1).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The “sharing” economy bears this shorthand name to represent new ways in which providers of services and those seeking services can connect through technological applications. In our paper, we foreground labor to understand how work is allocated, performed, monitored, and remunerated in the “sharing” economy. To capture more than metaphors like “sharing” can convey, we argue that an analytical framework is needed to characterize more carefully the exchanges between capital and labor. We propose that labor process theory, though formed in the era of manufacturing work, offers a useful analytical framework, anchored in the concepts of “obscuring and securing” how owners/managers derive profit from the value created by labor. Labor process theory offers a broad systemic perspective. While it is an analytical not a normative framework, it can provide a foundation for normative analysis of what we position as “distributing” the gains produced by workers, where distributing is the more apt concern than sharing. We derive three elements of a labor process toolkit – technological control, invisibility of owners/managers, and possessive individualism – and apply them to Uber as our case. We draw contrasts but also surprising similarities to “old” ways of working and also uncover how conflicts of interest between capital and labor portend ongoing instabilities.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 9 July 2018
Published date: 1 August 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 481407
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/481407
ISSN: 0065-0668
PURE UUID: 83e84a0e-9348-4345-b806-08af16c06fd8
ORCID for Sunyu Chai: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7817-7469

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Aug 2023 16:55
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:07

Export record

Contributors

Author: Sunyu Chai ORCID iD
Author: Maureen Scully

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×