The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparing care at walk-in centres and at accident and emergency departments: an exploration of patient choice, preference and satisfaction

Comparing care at walk-in centres and at accident and emergency departments: an exploration of patient choice, preference and satisfaction
Comparing care at walk-in centres and at accident and emergency departments: an exploration of patient choice, preference and satisfaction
Objectives: To explore the impact of establishing walk-in centres alongside emergency departments on patient choice, preference and satisfaction.
Methods: A controlled, mixed-method study comparing 8 emergency departments with co-located walk-in centres with the same number of "traditional" emergency departments. This paper focuses on the results of a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of users.
Results: Survey data demonstrated that patients were frequently unable to distinguish between being treated at a walk-in centre or at an accident and emergency (A&E) department and, even where this was the case, opportunities to exercise choice about their preferred care provider were often limited. Few made an active choice to attend a co-located walk-in centre. Patients attending walk-in centres were just as likely to be satisfied overall with the care they received as their counterparts who were treated in the co-located A&E facility, although walk-in centre users reported greater satisfaction with some specific aspects of their care and consultation.
Conclusions: Whereas one of the key policy goals underpinning the co-location of walk-in centres next to an A&E department was to provide patients with more options for accessing healthcare and greater choice, leading in turn to increased satisfaction, this evaluation was able to provide little evidence to support this. The high percentage of patients expressing a preference for care in an established emergency department compared with that in a new walk-in centre facility raises questions for future policy development. Further consideration should therefore be given to the role that A&E-focused walk-in centres play in the Department of Health’s current policy agenda, as far as patient choice is concerned.
walk-in centres, accident and emergency departments, patient choice, a controlled mixed-method study
1472-0205
260-264
Chalder, Melanie
e53b3e37-49c2-4019-b451-12f98710d9c0
Montgomery, Alan
6f6e4e9e-e78b-43b0-9334-05522cfd6cdf
Hollinghurst, Sandra
e0ec6e20-afca-437a-a2e1-4250ea157811
Cooke, Matthew
b28cc40d-9d09-4f1c-805c-a233e0d3d13c
Munro, James
bd980543-13fe-4044-b86a-98fc88e8dbe9
Lattimer, Val
5aa2c9a5-13cb-4776-9b0d-c618e6913f5b
Sharp, Deborah
5be021f2-ec75-4317-bf7d-f02328a50107
Salisbury, Chris
50e9a5a0-c074-4af8-9b1b-e1e8408aae3c
Chalder, Melanie
e53b3e37-49c2-4019-b451-12f98710d9c0
Montgomery, Alan
6f6e4e9e-e78b-43b0-9334-05522cfd6cdf
Hollinghurst, Sandra
e0ec6e20-afca-437a-a2e1-4250ea157811
Cooke, Matthew
b28cc40d-9d09-4f1c-805c-a233e0d3d13c
Munro, James
bd980543-13fe-4044-b86a-98fc88e8dbe9
Lattimer, Val
5aa2c9a5-13cb-4776-9b0d-c618e6913f5b
Sharp, Deborah
5be021f2-ec75-4317-bf7d-f02328a50107
Salisbury, Chris
50e9a5a0-c074-4af8-9b1b-e1e8408aae3c

Chalder, Melanie, Montgomery, Alan, Hollinghurst, Sandra, Cooke, Matthew, Munro, James, Lattimer, Val, Sharp, Deborah and Salisbury, Chris (2007) Comparing care at walk-in centres and at accident and emergency departments: an exploration of patient choice, preference and satisfaction. Emergency Medicine Journal, 24 (4), 260-264. (doi:10.1136/emj.2006.042499).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the impact of establishing walk-in centres alongside emergency departments on patient choice, preference and satisfaction.
Methods: A controlled, mixed-method study comparing 8 emergency departments with co-located walk-in centres with the same number of "traditional" emergency departments. This paper focuses on the results of a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of users.
Results: Survey data demonstrated that patients were frequently unable to distinguish between being treated at a walk-in centre or at an accident and emergency (A&E) department and, even where this was the case, opportunities to exercise choice about their preferred care provider were often limited. Few made an active choice to attend a co-located walk-in centre. Patients attending walk-in centres were just as likely to be satisfied overall with the care they received as their counterparts who were treated in the co-located A&E facility, although walk-in centre users reported greater satisfaction with some specific aspects of their care and consultation.
Conclusions: Whereas one of the key policy goals underpinning the co-location of walk-in centres next to an A&E department was to provide patients with more options for accessing healthcare and greater choice, leading in turn to increased satisfaction, this evaluation was able to provide little evidence to support this. The high percentage of patients expressing a preference for care in an established emergency department compared with that in a new walk-in centre facility raises questions for future policy development. Further consideration should therefore be given to the role that A&E-focused walk-in centres play in the Department of Health’s current policy agenda, as far as patient choice is concerned.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 April 2007
Keywords: walk-in centres, accident and emergency departments, patient choice, a controlled mixed-method study

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 48149
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/48149
ISSN: 1472-0205
PURE UUID: f88ef208-a78f-4c35-8f11-5b8e0b8b52d0

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Aug 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 09:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Melanie Chalder
Author: Alan Montgomery
Author: Sandra Hollinghurst
Author: Matthew Cooke
Author: James Munro
Author: Val Lattimer
Author: Deborah Sharp
Author: Chris Salisbury

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×