The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Differential effects of intra-modal and cross-modal reward value on perception: ERP evidence

Differential effects of intra-modal and cross-modal reward value on perception: ERP evidence
Differential effects of intra-modal and cross-modal reward value on perception: ERP evidence

In natural environments objects comprise multiple features from the same or different sensory modalities but it is not known how perception of an object is affected by the value associations of its constituent parts. The present study compares intra- and cross-modal valuedriven effects on behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of perception. Human participants first learned the reward associations of visual and auditory cues. Subsequently, they performed a visual discrimination task in the presence of previously rewarded, taskirrelevant visual or auditory cues (intra- and cross-modal cues, respectively). During the conditioning phase, when reward associations were learned and reward cues were the target of the task, high value stimuli of both modalities enhanced the electrophysiological correlates of sensory processing in posterior electrodes. During the post-conditioning phase, when reward delivery was halted and previously rewarded stimuli were task-irrelevant, cross-modal value significantly enhanced the behavioral measures of visual sensitivity, whereas intra-modal value produced only an insignificant decrement. Analysis of the simultaneously recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) of posterior electrodes revealed similar findings. We found an early (90-120 ms) suppression of ERPs evoked by high-value, intramodal stimuli. Cross-modal stimuli led to a later value-driven modulation, with an enhancement of response positivity for high- compared to low-value stimuli starting at the N1 window (180-250 ms) and extending to the P3 (300-600 ms) responses. These results indicate that sensory processing of a compound stimulus comprising a visual target and task-irrelevant visual or auditory cues is modulated by the reward value of both sensory modalities, but such modulations rely on distinct underlying mechanisms.

1932-6203
Vakhrushev, Roman
bf0a7642-b260-43ae-9141-e9cae652031f
Cheng, Felicia Pei-Hsin
182136f7-2bae-4baa-8766-a6a0fcc00bda
Schacht, Anne
f1c6c465-64db-4d02-be96-aa67deaca604
Pooresmaeili, Arezoo
319b6aed-8454-4ad2-b16e-8fadfdfd2e53
Megna, Nicola
55286962-7e00-470f-88ca-2bb7a4817f53
Vakhrushev, Roman
bf0a7642-b260-43ae-9141-e9cae652031f
Megna, Nicola
55286962-7e00-470f-88ca-2bb7a4817f53
Cheng, Felicia Pei-Hsin
182136f7-2bae-4baa-8766-a6a0fcc00bda
Schacht, Anne
f1c6c465-64db-4d02-be96-aa67deaca604
Pooresmaeili, Arezoo
319b6aed-8454-4ad2-b16e-8fadfdfd2e53

Vakhrushev, Roman, Cheng, Felicia Pei-Hsin, Schacht, Anne and Pooresmaeili, Arezoo , Megna, Nicola (ed.) (2023) Differential effects of intra-modal and cross-modal reward value on perception: ERP evidence. PLoS ONE, 18, [e0287900]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287900).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In natural environments objects comprise multiple features from the same or different sensory modalities but it is not known how perception of an object is affected by the value associations of its constituent parts. The present study compares intra- and cross-modal valuedriven effects on behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of perception. Human participants first learned the reward associations of visual and auditory cues. Subsequently, they performed a visual discrimination task in the presence of previously rewarded, taskirrelevant visual or auditory cues (intra- and cross-modal cues, respectively). During the conditioning phase, when reward associations were learned and reward cues were the target of the task, high value stimuli of both modalities enhanced the electrophysiological correlates of sensory processing in posterior electrodes. During the post-conditioning phase, when reward delivery was halted and previously rewarded stimuli were task-irrelevant, cross-modal value significantly enhanced the behavioral measures of visual sensitivity, whereas intra-modal value produced only an insignificant decrement. Analysis of the simultaneously recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) of posterior electrodes revealed similar findings. We found an early (90-120 ms) suppression of ERPs evoked by high-value, intramodal stimuli. Cross-modal stimuli led to a later value-driven modulation, with an enhancement of response positivity for high- compared to low-value stimuli starting at the N1 window (180-250 ms) and extending to the P3 (300-600 ms) responses. These results indicate that sensory processing of a compound stimulus comprising a visual target and task-irrelevant visual or auditory cues is modulated by the reward value of both sensory modalities, but such modulations rely on distinct underlying mechanisms.

Text
journal.pone.0287900 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 15 June 2023
Published date: 30 June 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 481624
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/481624
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 0a5f1430-1f8a-4fd9-acaa-d2818d481284
ORCID for Arezoo Pooresmaeili: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4369-8838

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Sep 2023 16:37
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Roman Vakhrushev
Editor: Nicola Megna
Author: Felicia Pei-Hsin Cheng
Author: Anne Schacht
Author: Arezoo Pooresmaeili ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×