The private sector activities of development finance institutions
The private sector activities of development finance institutions
This thesis focuses on the efforts by multilateral development banks (MDBs) and other development finance institutions (DFIs) to mobilise the private sector to fulfil the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement on climate change. Capital mobilisation matters because MDBs/DFIs do not have sufficient financial resources to complete the work alone. Consequently, there is an imperative to understand the mechanisms and forces at work that either enhance or inhibit mobilisation. The literature review draws together knowledge from a range of disciplines and frames it against the SDGs for the first time in the context of development of finance. This review highlighted several gaps in the research, some of which are filled in subsequent chapters using a mixed methods approach. An empirical study of competitive conditions using the Panzar-Rosse test reveals the market for development finance to be a competitive oligopoly. This implies that crowding in of private sector commercial banks will face some headwinds. The three qualitative studies were derived from a unique set of elite interviews conducted with 22 senior, front-line investment bankers from 18 banks with a total asset base of $25.6 trillion. A detailed study of Preferred Creditor Status shows that it appears to have no value as a financial asset for banks but does influence risk appetite leading to increased mobilisation. The second study explores the ‘bankability’ of a project or investment, finding that the market structure and practices of MDBs can conflict with the private sector, and that in complete reporting and taxonomies create mismatches between the goals of MDBs and private sector banks. Finally, an exploration of deal execution and structuring highlights various conflicts that could inhibit mobilisation. Complex financial structures to demonstrate additionality can reduce the pool of available financing, securitisation is likely to have limited scope, and MDB governance processes can be a limiting factor on mobilisation. This thesis has reframed the literature on development finance, resolved some research gaps and created a new research agenda. It provides a new perspective on the mechanics of capital mobilisation with value for practitioners engaged with implementing the SDGs, both in MDBs/DFIs and the private sector.
University of Southampton
McHugh, Christopher Andrew
20a2c756-a537-4eb4-a86d-443b01892385
September 2023
McHugh, Christopher Andrew
20a2c756-a537-4eb4-a86d-443b01892385
Kizys, Renatas
9d3a6c5f-075a-44f9-a1de-32315b821978
McHugh, Christopher Andrew
(2023)
The private sector activities of development finance institutions.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 244pp.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
This thesis focuses on the efforts by multilateral development banks (MDBs) and other development finance institutions (DFIs) to mobilise the private sector to fulfil the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement on climate change. Capital mobilisation matters because MDBs/DFIs do not have sufficient financial resources to complete the work alone. Consequently, there is an imperative to understand the mechanisms and forces at work that either enhance or inhibit mobilisation. The literature review draws together knowledge from a range of disciplines and frames it against the SDGs for the first time in the context of development of finance. This review highlighted several gaps in the research, some of which are filled in subsequent chapters using a mixed methods approach. An empirical study of competitive conditions using the Panzar-Rosse test reveals the market for development finance to be a competitive oligopoly. This implies that crowding in of private sector commercial banks will face some headwinds. The three qualitative studies were derived from a unique set of elite interviews conducted with 22 senior, front-line investment bankers from 18 banks with a total asset base of $25.6 trillion. A detailed study of Preferred Creditor Status shows that it appears to have no value as a financial asset for banks but does influence risk appetite leading to increased mobilisation. The second study explores the ‘bankability’ of a project or investment, finding that the market structure and practices of MDBs can conflict with the private sector, and that in complete reporting and taxonomies create mismatches between the goals of MDBs and private sector banks. Finally, an exploration of deal execution and structuring highlights various conflicts that could inhibit mobilisation. Complex financial structures to demonstrate additionality can reduce the pool of available financing, securitisation is likely to have limited scope, and MDB governance processes can be a limiting factor on mobilisation. This thesis has reframed the literature on development finance, resolved some research gaps and created a new research agenda. It provides a new perspective on the mechanics of capital mobilisation with value for practitioners engaged with implementing the SDGs, both in MDBs/DFIs and the private sector.
Text
Christopher_McHugh_Doctoral_Thesis_PDFA
- Version of Record
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mr-Christopher-McHugh
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Published date: September 2023
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 482211
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/482211
PURE UUID: fcb172aa-a915-40ed-864b-c1a67547c2d6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Sep 2023 16:42
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:55
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Christopher Andrew McHugh
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics