Seismic surveys off the South African coastline
Seismic surveys off the South African coastline
In two recent South African cases, the applicants sought interim interdicts preventing the respondent companies – Shell and Searcher – from continuing with, or alternatively commencing, their seismic surveys along the eastern and the western/south-western coasts of South Africa respectively. In both matters, rights in relation to searching for mineral or petroleum resources had been granted in terms of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002. The High Courts paid special attention to the inadequate public consultation processes that had been followed and highlighted the duty of Shell and Searcher to meaningfully consult with the affected communities and individuals. In both cases, the Courts found that the requirements for an interim interdict had been met, and Shell and Searcher were accordingly prohibited from continuing with or commencing their seismic surveys of the respective portions of the South African coast, pending the outcomes of the main applications.
consultation, Precautionary principle, seismic surveys, socio-ecological impacts, South Africa
553-564
Glazewski, Jan
d1b7ee5c-1e42-450b-b046-752320ae1c92
Du Toit, Louise
e0fb7237-6c1f-4c3c-9568-71f47f068a06
Glazewski, Jan
d1b7ee5c-1e42-450b-b046-752320ae1c92
Du Toit, Louise
e0fb7237-6c1f-4c3c-9568-71f47f068a06
Glazewski, Jan and Du Toit, Louise
(2022)
Seismic surveys off the South African coastline.
The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 37 (3), .
(doi:10.1163/15718085-bja10103).
Abstract
In two recent South African cases, the applicants sought interim interdicts preventing the respondent companies – Shell and Searcher – from continuing with, or alternatively commencing, their seismic surveys along the eastern and the western/south-western coasts of South Africa respectively. In both matters, rights in relation to searching for mineral or petroleum resources had been granted in terms of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002. The High Courts paid special attention to the inadequate public consultation processes that had been followed and highlighted the duty of Shell and Searcher to meaningfully consult with the affected communities and individuals. In both cases, the Courts found that the requirements for an interim interdict had been met, and Shell and Searcher were accordingly prohibited from continuing with or commencing their seismic surveys of the respective portions of the South African coast, pending the outcomes of the main applications.
Text
Glazewski and Du Toit_Seismic surveys off the South African coastline_copy-edited
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 1 July 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 July 2022
Keywords:
consultation, Precautionary principle, seismic surveys, socio-ecological impacts, South Africa
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 482271
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/482271
ISSN: 0927-3522
PURE UUID: 41608293-f064-4dd0-8dc2-d0b362ddb703
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Sep 2023 16:37
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:09
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jan Glazewski
Author:
Louise Du Toit
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics