The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Healthcare workers' perceptions of disaster risk management in Saudi Arabia hospitals

Healthcare workers' perceptions of disaster risk management in Saudi Arabia hospitals
Healthcare workers' perceptions of disaster risk management in Saudi Arabia hospitals
This study examines the effectiveness of Disaster Risk Management (DRM) strategies in public hospitals across Saudi Arabia, focusing on the perspectives of healthcare workers (HCWs), such as doctors, nurses, and administrators. Despite Saudi Arabia's significant DRM efforts, an empirical assessment of their effectiveness, particularly from the frontline workers, is still needed to identify potential areas of improvement. The inherent subjectivity and potential biases in risk perception notwithstanding, these findings could guide future policy improvements. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a descriptive, quantitative, non-probability sampling method among HCWs in 22 public hospitals across four regions of Saudi Arabia: Eastern, Western, Southern, and Central. These hospitals were selected based on their size, range of services, and geographical diversity. The HCWs were asked to evaluate the four DRM phases—Mitigation, Preparedness, Response, and Recovery—through questionnaires administered via Qualtrics and distributed via email and WhatsApp. Data analysis was performed using SPSS. The results indicated that the majority of HCWs perceive the DRM strategies as efficient, with disaster mitigation and response strategies being viewed as more effective than preparedness and recovery strategies. The study also revealed significant regional differences in perceived effectiveness of DRM strategies, with HCWs in the central region perceiving their strategies as more effective, particularly in disaster mitigation and preparedness, than their counterparts in the other regions. This study offers novel insights into HCWs' perspectives on DRM in Saudi public hospitals. Despite the overall positive perception of DRM strategies, the regional disparities underscore the need for harmonized and improved disaster risk management practices. Future research should focus on understanding the factors behind these regional differences to develop interventions that strengthen disaster preparedness and response strategies nationwide.
disaster management, healthcare, risk perception, resilience
Alshehri, Shahad Ali S.
0bdd3f22-db10-4f2b-9cef-7bdb74c832b8
Dawson, Ian
dff1b440-6c83-4354-92b6-04809460b01a
Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos
b97c23d9-8b24-4225-8da4-be7ac2a14fba
Alshehri, Norah
58a77e74-9c09-4e18-b004-e20d5fe5cb11
Alshehri, Shahad Ali S.
0bdd3f22-db10-4f2b-9cef-7bdb74c832b8
Dawson, Ian
dff1b440-6c83-4354-92b6-04809460b01a
Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos
b97c23d9-8b24-4225-8da4-be7ac2a14fba
Alshehri, Norah
58a77e74-9c09-4e18-b004-e20d5fe5cb11

Alshehri, Shahad Ali S., Dawson, Ian, Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos and Alshehri, Norah (2023) Healthcare workers' perceptions of disaster risk management in Saudi Arabia hospitals. European Safety and Reliability Conference 2023, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. 03 - 07 Sep 2023.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Other)

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of Disaster Risk Management (DRM) strategies in public hospitals across Saudi Arabia, focusing on the perspectives of healthcare workers (HCWs), such as doctors, nurses, and administrators. Despite Saudi Arabia's significant DRM efforts, an empirical assessment of their effectiveness, particularly from the frontline workers, is still needed to identify potential areas of improvement. The inherent subjectivity and potential biases in risk perception notwithstanding, these findings could guide future policy improvements. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a descriptive, quantitative, non-probability sampling method among HCWs in 22 public hospitals across four regions of Saudi Arabia: Eastern, Western, Southern, and Central. These hospitals were selected based on their size, range of services, and geographical diversity. The HCWs were asked to evaluate the four DRM phases—Mitigation, Preparedness, Response, and Recovery—through questionnaires administered via Qualtrics and distributed via email and WhatsApp. Data analysis was performed using SPSS. The results indicated that the majority of HCWs perceive the DRM strategies as efficient, with disaster mitigation and response strategies being viewed as more effective than preparedness and recovery strategies. The study also revealed significant regional differences in perceived effectiveness of DRM strategies, with HCWs in the central region perceiving their strategies as more effective, particularly in disaster mitigation and preparedness, than their counterparts in the other regions. This study offers novel insights into HCWs' perspectives on DRM in Saudi public hospitals. Despite the overall positive perception of DRM strategies, the regional disparities underscore the need for harmonized and improved disaster risk management practices. Future research should focus on understanding the factors behind these regional differences to develop interventions that strengthen disaster preparedness and response strategies nationwide.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 6 September 2023
Venue - Dates: European Safety and Reliability Conference 2023, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, 2023-09-03 - 2023-09-07
Keywords: disaster management, healthcare, risk perception, resilience

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 482286
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/482286
PURE UUID: 987d602e-b73e-41a7-b4f4-2695aa0bdc9f
ORCID for Ian Dawson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0555-9682
ORCID for Konstantinos Katsikopoulos: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9572-1980

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Sep 2023 16:34
Last modified: 01 Nov 2023 02:52

Export record

Contributors

Author: Shahad Ali S. Alshehri
Author: Ian Dawson ORCID iD
Author: Norah Alshehri

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×